Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

Washington’s bunker buster diplomacy

By Paul Iddon 3/3/2016
US President Barack Obama with his Defense Chief Ashton Carter. Photo: AFP
US President Barack Obama with his Defense Chief Ashton Carter. Photo: AFP

In recent months the Turkish government’s alarm at US policy in the region, especially towards the Syrian Kurds, has begun to echo that of Israel’s alarm over the Iran nuclear deal in the months leading to the July 2015 agreement. While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to, in January 2015, circumvent the incumbent Obama administration by addressing his political opponents in Congress directly, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan more recently questioned America’s long established friendship with his country and went so far as to say last month that it had to make a choice between Turkey and the Syrian Kurdish Peoples Protection Units (YPG).

In both cases Washington has sought to placate these traditional regional allies and reassure them they were sensitive to their concerns. One way they have tried to do this is to allow those allies to purchase advanced American weaponry to give them a technological edge over their enemies. Israel was offered the most powerful bunker buster in the US arsenal to give it the means to decisively cripple Iran’s nuclear program, parts of which are in reinforced underground sites, if it feels circumstances necessitate taking such an action.

The Israeli case is a little different from the Turkish case, obviously in the former the US hasn’t established any alliance with Tehran. Instead it sought to solve the nuclear issue through negotiation as opposed to risking going to war. Regarding Turkey and the YPG however Washington found that the best ally they had to work with on the ground in Syria in the war against Islamic State (ISIS) was in fact the YPG (Ankara didn’t join the multinational American-led coalition or even allow the US to use its Incirlik airbase until July 2015, nearly an entire year after the US-led campaign against ISIS begun). Turkey is against the YPG and views it as little more than the Syrian offshoot of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and treats it as such. While the US seeks to focus on the distinctions between the two, largely to legally justify supporting that indispensable ground ally in the anti-ISIS war, it agrees with Ankara in regard to the PKK and has even voiced support to Turkey’s ongoing conflict against the group.  

And amid Turkey’s continued airstrikes against the PKK in the Qandil Mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan the US has just announced it will deliver sophisticated bunker buster bombs to Turkey. This may well be Washington’s way of seeking to dissuade Ankara from trying to crush the YPG. After all it doubtlessly recognizes that the Turkish military establishment is very hesitant about launching a protracted ground campaign to destroy the YPG in northern Syria and that the Turkish political establishment is wary of looking weak at a time when it feels it is being pushed into a corner in the region by Iran and Russia. Therefore providing the Turks with such a weapon which would help them afflict more devastatingly lethal blows against the PKK in Qandil is a potentially shrewd move on the part of Washington which is maintaining an extremely delicate balancing act.

Turkey has tried for years to clear the PKK from that mountain. A major 1997 ground offensive of some 30,000 Turkish troops failed to decisively uproot the group from there and airstrikes over the subsequent two decades have also had diminishing returns. However bunker busters could potentially hurt the PKK who have spent years using caves to shield themselves from airstrikes. Turkey likely knows where many of these cave complexes are and such advanced munitions could do some real damage to the PKK there. Something Ankara needs and something which would allow it not to act upon its frequent threats to destroy the YPG while also saving face.

Paul Iddon is a Rudaw reporter based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
Torkish | 3/3/2016
As a Turk I wanna say this. Thanks Obama. Suck it PKK shills.
kurt basar | 3/3/2016
It is wrong & sad to see that the greatest democracy of the world selling those deadly bunker buster bombs to the Turkish terorist state, who are openly supporting the international ISIL criminals, Muslim brotherhood & Al Nusra (Qaeda) terorists. And in the meantime killing their Kurdish citizens by burning them alive, because Kurds are asking for their cultural rights, which Turkish state been denying to them last hundred years. Kurds in Turkey who are 25 millions & native of the cradle of the civilization, simply seeking their freedom, which are to be able to teach, read, write & sing from their own language & practice their culture, and because of these reasons the Kurdish uprisings has nothing to do with the terorists or terrorism. I think the USA & NATO countries should ask from the Turks to stop their unjust & immoral war against the Kurds & let the Kurds to teach and write their language for the peaceful solution & justice before selling them those deadly bombs.
K | 3/3/2016
Really, nothing has changed here. No surprises. It is the same old story. USA telling his old friend Turkey we give you what you want to bomb the hell out of whoever you want in Turkey and Iraq part of Kurdistan. The Kurdish leaders in Iraq won't and can't say anything because we have silenced them. Leave the Syrian problem for us and let us use the Kurdish forces in Syria for for now and we promise you that we will put fingers up them too. It should't take too much to brush the crimes under the carpet and it should't take too long for the Kurd to be forgotten. We have done that may times and we can do it again. If only our brave Kurdish fighters realize what they are wasting their blood for? If only......
Haval | 3/3/2016
There are 5000 pkk in mt, how about 32 million Kurds in land on med ( turkey occupied) As a Kurd served in us military All American loves Kurds and support Kurds And feel sorry for these flat face mongul Turks Soon or later there will be a Kurdistan and Turks need to pack their belonging and head back to Mongolia and peace will be back to Land of med
ian | 3/3/2016
bloody septic tanks. just have to butt in where they are not wanted again.war is the only thing that keeps the usa going. what a pack of morons!

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Yassir Fekaiki
Yassir Fekaiki | 10/16/2018 10:13:15 PM
Thank Bafel talabany and his henchmen, how come no kurd is holding the traitors accountable?
mark bishop | 10/18/2018 7:27:40 AM
We have great respect for Masoud Barzani. But his statement on October 16 only gives us half of a message. He says that the events leading up to...
Kurds want justice a year after Iraq's takeover of Kirkuk
| 16/10/2018 | (6)
Jiyan | 10/18/2018 7:15:41 AM
Bahman Ghoubadi's films have had no good use for Kurds, they only belittle Kurds as premimitive and useless. I hope other filmmakers will be more...
Kurdish filmmakers need to be better storytellers: Amir Gholami
| 20 hours ago | (1)
haluk | 10/17/2018 4:53:04 AM
Around 1200 BC, different factors such as climate change, volcano eruptions, earthquakes and large scale migrations (the mysterious "sea people")...
Orxan | 10/17/2018 11:44:08 PM
This Is Assyria and mesopotamian history Kurds are Iranians, they do not belong in this land
Ancient lost city of Mardaman slowly gives up its secrets
| 16/10/2018 | (3)
Ian Birmingham | 10/17/2018 7:41:56 PM
As clearly demonstrated on 25 September 2017, 93% of KRG voters favor independence from Iraq. PUK lied to and betrayed KRG on 16 October 2017,...
Burkan | 10/17/2018 9:57:41 PM
Where’s the sources for the conversations and meetongs that took place? Any third party or just what youclaim?
The fight for Iraq’s presidency: What happened on October 2?
| yesterday at 01:45 | (7)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Pipe connects Duhok with Mosul Dam to help dwindling supply in Kurdistan 6 hours ago |

Pipe connects Duhok with Mosul Dam to help dwindling supply in Kurdistan

It is clean water and we are connecting it to more
Rights group: Insulting the Turkish president shouldn't be a crime 7 hours ago |

Rights group: Insulting the Turkish president shouldn't be a crime

Four graduates of the Middle East Technical more
0.5 seconds