Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Peshmerga-Iraqi forces united over Mosul, but can this last?

By Paul Iddon 3/11/2016
Convoy of Peshmerga vehicles participating in the Mosul operation. Hejar Jawhar / Rudaw.
Convoy of Peshmerga vehicles participating in the Mosul operation. Hejar Jawhar / Rudaw.
Close cooperation between the Iraqi military and Kurdish Peshmerga in the Mosul operation may come to an end when the common goal of defeating ISIS is achieved, analysts have warned.

Yerevan Saeed, an analyst and Research Associate at the Arab Gulf Institute in Washington, believes that the cooperation is "unprecedented" but told Rudaw English that he worries more about the post-ISIS situation in Mosul, “where all the competing forces will seek to harvest the spoils of the battle.”

“Now ISIS has become a glue to keep all competing stakeholders together, but once the glue is gone, its hard see such cooperation would continue,” Saeed explained. “What you have there are forces divided by ethnic and sectarian lines in which each tries to get the biggest share of the cake. Despite their patriotism rhetoric, they are driven by their ethnic and sectarian interests.”

Michael Knights, the Lafer Fellow at the Washington Institute, is more optimistic. He believes that the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) leadership “has chosen a very pragmatic approach to this battle in Mosul.”

“Allowing Iraqi Army forces into the Nineveh Plains and Mosul Dam area was a big step,” he told Rudaw English. “This indicates that a strong set of guarantees has been negotiated by the Coalition regarding the demilitarization or shared control of both areas after the battle.”

While Knights dubs this “a promising start” he, like Saeed, is cautious about how long-lasting this cooperation is.

“We’ll have to see how both sides handle the demilitarization of both these areas when this battle is finished,” he cautioned.

A reminder of past tensions between Baghdad and Erbil resurfaced late last month when former Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki lashed out at the ruling Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), accusing it of harboring “Israeli sympathizers” in the Kurdistan Region. The KDP responded by saying the “crimes he (Maliki) has committed against the Kurdish nation are no lesser than the crimes of Ali Hasan al-Majid (Chemical Ali).”

While this exchange isn’t overly significant today since Maliki is no longer prime minister it could be a warning of things to come if he ever does manage to reclaim power. There are already serious fears Maliki is maneuvering his way back to power in Baghdad and was behind the respective votes of no-confidence against former Iraqi defense minister Khaled al-Obeidi and finance minister Hoshyar Zebari, done simply in order to weaken Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi and create a power vacuum.

During his time as prime minister Maliki even once hinted at sending the Iraqi Army to Erbil, but said he would only do so when he received F-16 jet fighter bombers from the United States. Since that time Iraq has started taking delivery of a fleet of these jets and is currently using them in the war against ISIS.

“Now Iraq has F-16s, but they’re dropping bombs in support of the Peshmerga advance in Mosul, not on the Peshmerga,” Knights noted, adding that he hopes it stays this way.

However, the worrisome prospect for future conflict with Baghdad after Mosul’s liberation remains. Saeed predicts several scenarios in which conflict may break out between the forces whose guns are all currently arrayed against ISIS.

“Once ISIS is gone, we have forces such as those led by former Nineveh governor Atheel al-Nujaifi. who will come face to face with Iraqi forces and Shia militias,” he said. “In addition, we will have different Sunni forces from Mosul who are led by different leaders.”

Saeed also identifies the so-called disputed territories between the KRG and Baghdad in Nineveh as a potential flashpoint. The vast majority of these territories have been secured by ISIS from the Peshmerga. The status of these territories was supposed to have been conclusively resolved years ago under the terms of Article 140 of the Iraqi Constitution, which the government in Baghdad has never implemented.

“It’s hard to see how Kurds will leave parts of Nineveh province that are predominantly Kurdish. For Kurds, their Peshmerga forces are drawing the borders of Kurdistan with their own blood,” Saeed explained.

“Thus, we will have range of very contentious issues that will pop up as soon as ISIS is gone,” he concluded.

For now, Baghdad and Erbil are cooperating and fighting against the same enemy. However, given the recent tensions and historic conflict between them this current cooperation could prove to be a rare exception to a much more general rule.


adam | 3/11/2016
Tal Afar must be part of Kurdistan otherwise Syrian Kurdistan wont be part of Kurdistan.
Ben | 3/11/2016
They need a new common enemy, the invading Turkish troops inside Iraqi/Kurdish territory would be a good place to start, this will build more momentum and make the increase solidarity between the two sides.
Peace | 4/11/2016
Now that Isis is a dying force they need to start a bigger war. Sunni vs Shiite and Kurdish vs Arabs vs Turkmens. Lets see how this all turns out but know this that there are no winners everybody loses.
Peter | 5/11/2016
Peace is not peace when you give up your freedom you must be from the west and have forgotten freedom isnt free we just have allowed our yound to think so such a shame

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Yassir Fekaiki
Yassir Fekaiki | 10/16/2018 10:13:15 PM
Thank Bafel talabany and his henchmen, how come no kurd is holding the traitors accountable?
mark bishop | 10/18/2018 7:27:40 AM
We have great respect for Masoud Barzani. But his statement on October 16 only gives us half of a message. He says that the events leading up to...
Kurds want justice a year after Iraq's takeover of Kirkuk
| 16/10/2018 | (6)
Jiyan | 10/18/2018 7:15:41 AM
Bahman Ghoubadi's films have had no good use for Kurds, they only belittle Kurds as premimitive and useless. I hope other filmmakers will be more...
Kurdish filmmakers need to be better storytellers: Amir Gholami
| 20 hours ago | (1)
haluk | 10/17/2018 4:53:04 AM
Around 1200 BC, different factors such as climate change, volcano eruptions, earthquakes and large scale migrations (the mysterious "sea people")...
Orxan | 10/17/2018 11:44:08 PM
This Is Assyria and mesopotamian history Kurds are Iranians, they do not belong in this land
Ancient lost city of Mardaman slowly gives up its secrets
| 16/10/2018 | (3)
Ian Birmingham | 10/17/2018 7:41:56 PM
As clearly demonstrated on 25 September 2017, 93% of KRG voters favor independence from Iraq. PUK lied to and betrayed KRG on 16 October 2017,...
Burkan | 10/17/2018 9:57:41 PM
Where’s the sources for the conversations and meetongs that took place? Any third party or just what youclaim?
The fight for Iraq’s presidency: What happened on October 2?
| yesterday at 01:45 | (7)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Pipe connects Duhok with Mosul Dam to help dwindling supply in Kurdistan 6 hours ago |

Pipe connects Duhok with Mosul Dam to help dwindling supply in Kurdistan

It is clean water and we are connecting it to more
Rights group: Insulting the Turkish president shouldn't be a crime 7 hours ago |

Rights group: Insulting the Turkish president shouldn't be a crime

Four graduates of the Middle East Technical more
1.218 seconds