Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

Erbil and Syrian federalism

By Paul Iddon 8/3/2016
Syrian flag flying over Damascus, the capital of Syria. Photo: AP
Syrian flag flying over Damascus, the capital of Syria. Photo: AP
As the future for a war-ravaged and fractured Syrian nation-state is once again under discussion, as a fragile week-old ceasefire continues to endure, federalism has once again been a suggested solution. Like Iraq the option makes sense, here is a country which has been mired in internal strife and where ethno-sectarian fissures have deepened to what might well be the point of no return.

 Federalism and a less powerful central authority seems to be the best way Syria can survive without breaking up into homogenous ethno-sectarian stateless or becoming destined to suffer eternal conflict and instability. 

And as was the case with the Kurdistan Region of Iraq in the post-2003 order federalism will likely see the Kurds of Syria given a significant amount of autonomy and self-governance. The leading party in Syrian Kurdistan, the Syrian Democratic Union Party (PYD), has long said they seek union with Damascus provided they get autonomy and provided their regional system of governance can remain in place. Additionally they have little time for the regime of President Bashar al-Assad and would doubtlessly welcome a political transition in Damascus. That being said they also feel, and have said, that if he were to fall tomorrow that would cause more harm than good since the increasing number of rampaging armed Islamist groups fighting him could very well benefit.  

Even the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) has forgone its former goal of achieving full-fledged Kurdish independence and has instead, in recent years, advocated the democratization and federalization of the countries with Kurdish populations reasoning that a federal democratic system would enshrine the cultural and political rights of Kurds as equal citizens and stimulate greater cooperation as opposed to antagonism. Which would be mutually beneficial for obvious reasons. 

The Iraqi Kurds have long sought autonomy over independence. President Masoud Barzani often stressed that he wanted for the Kurdistan Region what the Scots have in the United Kingdom. Autonomy and all the rights that entails. Even when Iraq as a state was, arguably, at its weakest militarily (in 2003-04 when the army was actually disbanded) Iraq’s Kurds didn’t seek to take up arms to declare an independent polity for themselves but instead sought to consolidate their autonomy and see if a new federal Iraq would work. Having given it a chance many Iraqi Kurds see no viable future for Iraq as a polity or a bright future for them within Iraq. Now Erbil is pursuing its right to hold an independence referendum before the end of this year. Given the historical record alluded to above this move could hardly be described as short-sighted, quixotic nor opportunistic. 

And while pursuing this referendum Erbil has stressed that it believes the federal option to be the best one for the Kurds of Syria and have urged them to pursue it. Such an open endorsement of the federal option for Syria as opposed to some “Plan B” which could see Syria partitioned, and possibly the creation of a de-facto Kurdish state in northern Syria as a direct result, is quite consistent with Erbil’s aim to reassure its neighbours that an independent Kurdish nation-state in the Kurdistan Region will not infringe upon their current borders. By endorsing the federal option in Syria Erbil is also demonstrating that it does not seek to stir-up separatist sentiments in the neighbouring Kurdish regions. This is key to placating Iran and Turkey whose acceptance will be of fundamental significance for them when it comes to achieving a secure and independent state. 

In other words if Erbil makes a full drive for independence after the referendum it will be independence for part of Kurdistan. They will not seek to create a Greater Kurdistan nation state. Advocating for federalism and greater minority rights for their brethren in the surrounding region will give those Kurds a stake in those countries and lessen the immediate desire to seek full-fledged statehood for themselves also. Something which is actually in the interest of those countries. 

This is also a clever way for Erbil to demonstrate to the world powers that this upcoming referendum merely pertains to the right of their people for self-determination and isn’t a move aimed at completely upending the entire Middle Eastern order. An order which has proven to be anything but stable or well designed. 

Paul Iddon is a Rudaw reporter based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
K | 8/3/2016
I believe people either forgetting or fooling themselves that Syria, Iraq and Turkey are a made up states by the foreign powers. They are not nations. As much as I am in support of nations to be on good terms with each other, I don't believe it will work when a nation is divided by a false boundaries and asked to be ruled by another. If the Kurds have a federal state with the Arabs of Syria and another Kurdish state have a federal state with the Arabs of Iraq, what will happen between these to separate federal Kurdish states when war breaks out between Iraq and Syria? Why can't the the two Kurdish federal states cannot form a united Kurdish states and live united. Dividing a nation and force them to live in separate federal states have never worked and will never work. Remember the Berlin Wall?
Muraz Adzhoev | 8/3/2016
Exactly and certainly, "In other words if Erbil makes a full drive for independence after the referendum it will be independence for part of Kurdistan. They will not seek to create a Greater Kurdistan nation state". However "independence for part of Kurdistan" is a compromise and actually should and will anyway mean sooner integration of Southern Kurdistan and Western Kurdistan, because Syria obviously is as dead and failed as Iraq. Turkey and also Iran have to accept this absolutely reasonable and peaceful Kurdish compromise in order to protect and keep safe their own state integrity and sovereignty. That's the only mean to pave the way for peacefully coexisting longterm neighborhoods of mutually advantageous cooperation and partnership. Otherwise there inevitably will be a Greater War in the Middle East.
Allan | 8/3/2016
Why not hold a whole referendum in all artificially made countries in middle east to ask people in each village, town, city and province to see where do they desire to belong to peacefully under UN supervision?! it makes great sense for arabs to be happy to live together under one country, likewise Kurdish Nation , turks, farsi speaking people in part of Iran, Afghanistan, ... Balochi speaking people and so on. Then there won't be any war in this region any more . like the european style and system.
Hans Guderian | 8/3/2016
@K : Explain how Turkey is a made up state by a foreign power. Don't confuse your tribal existence and Arabs under boot with Turks. Remember whose Empire you were living under, before you BS.
Brzoo Kurdi
Brzoo Kurdi | 9/3/2016
If the Kurds were surrounded by civilized nations , independent would be as easy as drinking water ,but we are surrounded by savage and barbaric nations like Arabs and Turks who still believe women are born to be exploited by men ,what do you expect of nations like Arab who have not solved Sunni and Shiite problems for more than 1000 years ,what do you expect of the lunatics in Iran who believes classical music must be banned ? there is one solution for nations like that atomic bomb to eradicate the madness of Allah and Mohammad .
5474 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Guest | 10/16/2018 5:19:46 PM
I agree with you Mr. Romano. Except, I don't think Turkey is an emerging threat, it's conversion to a totalitarian style government along with its...
Masque du Furet | 10/17/2018 4:54:08 AM
Well, as hostage diplomacy seems efficient, it is time for Tutkey to find new hostages (mormons, popists might be interesting). OTOH, if US do not...
Time for US to reassess Turkey's support for extremists
| yesterday at 10:22 | (5)
Baban | 10/16/2018 8:47:00 PM
A cruical milestone in the history of our homelands, a beautiful insight in the work of uncovering important artifacts that i hope will take shape...
haluk | 10/17/2018 4:53:04 AM
Around 1200 BC, different factors such as climate change, volcano eruptions, earthquakes and large scale migrations (the mysterious "sea people")...
Ancient lost city of Mardaman slowly gives up its secrets
| yesterday at 07:13 | (2)
Kdp sold kirkuk | 10/17/2018 3:28:43 AM
Both sold kirkuk. Kurdistan will never be indipendent with kdp puk. Why kdp join iraq govermentare they not against iraq or are they just liars?
Shawn | 10/17/2018 4:21:31 AM
This PUK guy is blaming KDP for the mess the KirKuk in!!! Are you kidding. This PUK dude needs to get his head out his rear and shut the F****k...
KDP, PUK in row over Kirkuk governorship
| yesterday at 08:05 | (8)
Y. A. | 10/16/2018 11:28:54 PM
May Allah Khode help The Kurds and make their enemies taste occupation so they would feel it as they have made the Kurds feel it
Kawan | 10/17/2018 1:44:33 AM
A dark day in kurdish history
The fall of Kirkuk: Flashbacks of October 16
| yesterday at 12:00 | (10)
0.281 seconds