Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

After Paris: How NATO should retaliate against ISIS

By Paul Iddon 18/11/2015
A French Rafale fighter jet taking off from the United Arab Emirates to bomb Raqa. Photo: AFP
A French Rafale fighter jet taking off from the United Arab Emirates to bomb Raqa. Photo: AFP
 

There has been much speculation over whether or not France will invoke Article 5 of NATO's charter in light of the horrific terrorist attack in Paris this month. Invoking Article 5 may well pit the whole NATO military alliance against the Islamic State (ISIS).

Given the fact that a sizable U.S.-led coalition – France has arguably been the most active of the European powers in this campaign, even before this latest attack – has been targeting that group from the air in both Iraq and Syria for over a year now, it's worth questioning what a NATO alliance would do differently.

France has already hit the so-called “capital-city” of the Islamic State, Raqqa, with at least twenty air strikes in the aftermath of the Paris attacks. The coalition has been hitting ISIS-related targets in that city from the air for well over a year now. Additionally in recent days France, and now the U.S., have begun bombing targets related to ISIS's black market oil trade to further hurt that group's ability to generate revenue.

There is something a French-led NATO effort could do differently which could deliver a more decisive and damaging blow to the group. That would be the establishment of a buffer-zone along a 68-mile stretch of Syria's border with Turkey.

Turkish premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan has recently reignited his idea of setting up such a zone in Northern Syria. Many accuse and suspect him, quite rightfully, of wanting to intervene and ensure that Syria's Kurds do not link up their three cantons– something that would give them effective control over Syria's entire frontier with Turkey stretching from the east by the Iraqi border to the northwest of the major Syrian city of Aleppo.

Ankara was particularly incensed when Syrian Kurdish Peoples Protection Units (YPG) fighters kicked ISIS out of the border-town of Gire Spi (Tal Abyad) and linked up their two biggest cantons of Jazira and Kobani over the summer. That move gave the YPG effective control over a contiguous piece of border territory that is roughly two-thirds of Syria's northern frontier. West of the Euphrates is a 68-mile stretch of terrain which divides Kobani from the remaining westernmost, and smallest, of Syria Kurdistan's three cantons: Afrin.

ISIS and other Islamist groups are presently in that area. In fact it's the only part of the Syrian border with Turkey they still have some control over. France and Turkey's interests could well converge on this issue. But for different reasons: France wants to deliver a decisive blow to ISIS and Turkey wants to ensure that the YPG does not cross the Euphrates from Kobani. On the west bank of that iconic river sits the town of Jarablus. It is occupied by ISIS and ISIS has recently been firing mortars at Kurdish villages near Kobani. Turkey hasn't fired on ISIS there but has fired on YPG fighters in Kobani and said they will intervene to stop them from crossing that river to push ISIS out of Jarablus.

Having a NATO force intervene in that 68-mile stretch of territory and kick out ISIS, and other similar Islamist's like the al-Nusra Front, the pressure on Syria's Kurds would be relieved in both Kobani and Afrin and the Kurds might prefer a buffer zone under NATO than Turkey if there is ever going to be one. And ISIS would be completely cut off and all of Syria's frontier with Turkey would effectively be in control of that group’s enemies.

Also any NATO ground forces deployed in that part of Syria would be operating along the Turkish frontier with Syria, the “southern flank” of that alliance. ISIS would have to stretch its resources to retain a presence there, something they are likely unable, and unwilling, to do. When the YPG pushed ISIS out of Gire Spi over the summer they came from Kobani to the towns west and Jazira from east ISIS stood no chance and were unable to retain hold or send in reinforces to try and defend it.

Jarablus would likely be a similar case. Routing ISIS out of there would not only be the symbolic victory President Hollande and the coalition need but it would also constitute, in the long-term, a strategic victory since it would further cut-off ISIS from the outside world, further increase the pressure on it and speed up its long overdue demise.


Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
123
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
kurt basar | 18/11/2015
Very simple, close their gate of the hell which is go through Turkey, who are their patron saint, suppliers, supporters & trade partners by buying their oil & goods. And letting those ISIL savage criminals & new recruiters in & out the Syria with the Turkish passport, and treating those criminals & cutthroats at their hospitals. The USA should warn Turks who are NATO member for thir these illegal trades with them, for to make the AKP cult & Mr. Talip Erdogan one of the richest man, who is openly support the Muslim brotherhood org, Al Nusra, ISIL, Hamas & all other Muslim terrorist groups. The USA should support & arm the Kurds & let them to cross the Euphrates river all to the Afrin region for to clean that area from those savages for good regardless of the Turkish objection.
Ian Birmingham | 18/11/2015
Great idea, but finding the troops will be the hard part. Russia might be the only country willing to send troops there, but Russia isn't a NATO member. Most NATO countries would happily drop bombs & missiles as needed, but they rely on Kurds to do the ground work. NATO member Turkey could send its troops in, but is Turkey really willing to do the ground work in this scenario?
Brzoo Kurdi
Brzoo Kurdi | 18/11/2015
After reading this article, I am a bit more optimistic about the fate of the Kurd in Rojava.. hopefully NATo will interfere and as the author of the article says "Syria's Kurds would be relieved in both Kobani and Afrin "we all know NATO without Turkey is more moral and more human , with Turkey they look very unprofessional,i have a feeling the leaders of NATo do talk to each other in private and do express their discontent about the behavior of the current government in Turkey...lets not regard Turkey as important a member of NaTo as France or Germany.
| 18/11/2015
Excellent article!
Williams | 18/11/2015
NATO should be assigned with responsibility to cope with terrorism threat. US Intel Agencies: Out. No more torture.
Tags :
4070 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Rojhelati Kurmanc | 4/28/2017 6:04:24 AM
NATO and Israel should attack Iran, you will also get support from Kurds, Baloch, Arabs, Majority Iranians and Gilaki in Iran. Entire arab sunni...
Iran’s Kurdish opposition call for boycott of May elections
| 4 hours ago | (1)
michel.kinnis | 4/27/2017 3:21:49 PM
POTUS Trump is not Housein Obama !! He will help the Kurds in both Syria and Iraq to Prevent Iran to come through to Syria and Lebanon. Israel says...
Rojhelati Kurmanc | 4/28/2017 5:48:43 AM
Turkish trolls working hard, how are you doing "Berivan".
After Turkey struck YPG positions, US says it's asked Ankara to stop
| yesterday at 12:07 | (11)
Dutchman | 4/27/2017 1:27:18 PM
Israel has a right to defend itsself against terrorist groups like Hezbollah and its parners in crime: the Assad regime, Iran and Russia. Putin knows...
Rojhelati Kurmanc | 4/28/2017 5:45:05 AM
The kurds in Libanon have no rights in Libanon. Israel should remove the arabs in Israel and put in the kurds instead. Arabs never took the deal to...
Israeli warplanes strike Lebanese Hezbollah weapons cache near Damascus, reports
| yesterday at 12:52 | (3)
T.I. | 4/27/2017 11:18:15 PM
Merkel knows that the EU can't influence or contain Turkey (Erdogan) through "engagement", what she's really saying here is no matter how bad Turkey...
Mohamedzzz | 4/28/2017 5:12:34 AM
Angela Merkel is right, all Muslim countries look guidance from Turkey and an upset Turkey can bring a lot of trouble, with or without adhering to EU.
Merkel calls it a mistake for the EU to turn its back on Turkey
| 13 hours ago | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Kurdish MPs ask European parliament to support reactivation of their parliament 14 hours ago |

Kurdish MPs ask European parliament to support reactivation of their parliament

Kurdish parliament has been blocked since October more
Kurdish referendum needs parliamentary mandate, PUK and Gorran 22/4/2017 | (5)

Kurdish referendum needs parliamentary mandate, PUK and Gorran

KDP insists the referendum doesn't need a more
Surviving two genocides: Families escaped Halabja attack only to face Anfal 21/4/2017 | (2)

Surviving two genocides: Families escaped Halabja attack only to face Anfal

“How can I not be worried? My heart burns in pain more
0.187 seconds