Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

Joint operation against ISIS underscores importance of securing Mosul periphery

By Paul Iddon 26/3/2016
Iraqi soldiers in their push to recapture villages around Mosul on Saturday. Photo from Rudaw video.
Iraqi soldiers in their push to recapture villages around Mosul on Saturday. Photo from Rudaw video.
US-led coalition forces on Thursday gave close air support to an offensive by the Iraqi Army, Kurdish Peshmerga and Sunni Arab militiamen against the Islamic State (ISIS) in the Makhmour region southeast of Mosul. Despite the operation having a number of shortcomings it is nevertheless a very important dress rehearsal for the future liberation of Mosul itself.

While seemingly limited on the surface, the operation achieved one important overall strategic goal: limiting ISIS’s power to project force and hurl projectiles at Iraqi soldiers, the Peshmerga, Sunni militiamen and US Marines, as they stage forces and logistics in preparation for the long-anticipated battle for Mosul.

The presence of the US Marines on the ground near Makhmour was revealed when Staff Sgt. Louis F. Cardin was killed by an ISIS-launched Katyusha projectile earlier in the week. That was the same type of weaponry used by ISIS when it bombed Turkey’s Bashiqa forward-operating base last December.

With howitzer artillery guns positioned at the Marine firebase, its purpose is to defend the staging area being established by these various forces, which are united around the singular goal of forcing ISIS from Nineveh province and to cover the initial advances of these forces.

This, coupled with denying ISIS the ability to set up any offensive weaponry in that area, is key to creating a secure staging area near Mosul for these forces to mass the various logistics they will need to liberate that city.

When Saddam Hussein infamously invaded and annexed Kuwait back in August 1990, the United States initiated Operation Desert Shield and began to amass military forces in Saudi Arabia. In the early days of that enormous logistical operation there were fears that the build-up would be compromised in its early stage by another Iraqi advance into the Saudi kingdom. While that did not happen, it is notable how crucial it was to secure a position from which to gather the various forces needed to confront the Iraqi military and how important it is to completely destroy the enemy’s ability to project any force outside of its territory.

This appears to be what the various forces amassed to liberate Mosul are doing. Liberating villages on the periphery, using sizable forces that have close air support, is gradually and incrementally forcing ISIS further back into its most fortified and defensive position, Mosul itself.

Exploiting the difficulty that group faces in defending outlying positions – which is what the Peshmerga did in Shingal city last November and what the Syrian Democratic Forces did in Shaddadi in Syria’s Hasakah Province in February – and denying it the ability to use those outposts to fire at coalition staging areas is a smart strategy and much more prudent than launching an immediate mass assault to try and retake Mosul in one fell scoop.

Also, not unlike Ramadi, it’s a less risky trial run in a real combat situation to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the various forces.

On Thursday, Iraqi military forces attempted to retake the village of Nasser from ISIS southeast of Mosul. Their initial assault saw their vehicles getting stuck in mud and exposed to ISIS fire. Their fellow troops had to lay down suppressing fire so they could evacuate before another offensive was launched. One Iraqi soldier was killed and 12 others wounded in that failed assault. Had that assault been going into Mosul the casualties would likely be much higher.

Choking further supply lines into Mosul and securing footholds for staging areas and building them up with the variety of equipment they will need is essential. Mosul is no doubt laden with booby traps and improvised explosive devices which will need advanced equipment to both detect and disarm. While air power will play an important role in the assault, the forces on the ground will nevertheless need ample fire power, protection and mobility to engage ISIS in the inevitable close quarters street-to-street fighting.

While Mosul is far from liberated these recent events are an important first step to successfully amassing the necessary forces and ensuring that they are trained and ready to undertake the unenviable task which lies ahead – the successful liberation of that key city.

Paul Iddon is a Rudaw reporter based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

Comments

 
FAUthman | 26/3/2016
You are wrong, Iraqi army has not taken Nasr village and is still on the east side of the Tigris. In fact it turned around and ran when mortars started coming down near Nasr. Here is the latest report: "But the combat around Nasr did not go well. ISIS “left the village, and came back after a few hours,” said one tired Shia Arab fighter named Mohammed who is part of the Shia-led Hashid Shaabi militia forces"
Tags :
3947 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Adstar | 7/25/2017 3:38:26 AM
She made her own bed.. Now she can sleep in it.. You can be assured most Germans will not want her back.. They do not support the death penalty but...
green activist defector | 7/25/2017 12:22:14 PM
joshcka fischer the "green activist" and turkish lobbyist in berlin maybe can talk to his boss in ankara to solve this girls situation.
German girl who joined ISIS wants to leave Iraq, return to family
| yesterday at 11:45 | (10)
Gorran is betrayal | 7/25/2017 11:31:12 AM
Russia recognizes the right of the Kurds on indpendence , but Gorran denies the Kurds the right to hold the referendeum on independence.
kurd | 7/25/2017 11:33:27 AM
when he talks to turkish and iranian newspapers, he condemns kurdish independence. some of these comments show how many are naive
Sergey Lavrov to Rudaw: Referendum is expression of Kurdish people’s aspirations
| yesterday at 08:55 | (8)
Gorran is betrayal | 7/25/2017 11:22:49 AM
Gorran is treason , is anti-kurdish .
alan | 7/25/2017 11:29:41 AM
A new leader who is not family member of the former leader? If KDP or PUK gets a new leader he will be from the same family. Thanks we have Gorran...
New Gorran leader: We can achieve party’s objectives through dialogue
| 10 hours ago | (2)
Dana | 7/25/2017 10:47:59 AM
All that useless repetition of obvious information made the article horrible to read, not to mention that it missed the most important detail, which...
Al-Qaida in Syria close to snuffing out competition in north
| 16 hours ago | (1)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

NRT TV owner announces vote-no campaign for referendum 5 hours ago |

NRT TV owner announces vote-no campaign for referendum

He called referendum a “dangerous gamble with more
Kurdish official says US role essential in post-IS Syria 6 hours ago |

Kurdish official says US role essential in post-IS Syria

Americans " must continue until a democratic more
PM Abadi: I won’t deploy tanks to Kurdistan in response to referendum 7 hours ago |

PM Abadi: I won’t deploy tanks to Kurdistan in response to referendum

PM Abadi: “I mean, what I will do? Will I deploy more
0.36 seconds