Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





From One Iraq to One Syria

By Paul Iddon 27/12/2015
President Barack Obama shakes hands with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in a bilateral meeting. AP File Photo.
President Barack Obama shakes hands with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin in a bilateral meeting. AP File Photo.
When Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently said that Russia is ready to support the Syrian Kurds in their fight against Islamic State (ISIS) he reportedly made a point of saying the weapons and funds they would give that group would go through the central government in Damascus. Meaning that Russia would, in essence, be pursuing a ‘One Syria’ policy as the Americans do with Iraq. 

There has been much speculation since the Russian deployment in Syria and the subsequent tensions with Turkey over whether or not the Russians will begin directly backing the Syrian Kurdish Peoples Protection Units (YPG) forces in their fight against the Islamic State (ISIS) and other Islamist groups. The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) victory against ISIS at Tishreen Dam on the Euphrates this weekend may prove to be the beginning of a YPG offensive against ISIS and other Islamist groups in that direction. Which would benefit some of Damascus and Moscow’s short-term tactical, perhaps even strategic, goals since it would help sever supply lines to groups the Russians have been bombing in that area. 

The YPG officially denies that any such coordination is taking place or in the works. The political wing of the YPG, the Democratic Union Party (PYD), also says there is no future for Assad in Syria. They do not seek outright independence for Syrian Kurdistan (Rojava) but seek a form of autonomy within a democratic, federal and secular Syrian state. It’s doubtful they would willingly acquiesce to being under Assad’s rule again. Since the onset of this conflict Syria’s Kurds have wisely stuck to themselves, defended their territory and avoided starting a fight with the regime, instead gradually waiting while the Syrian military’s foothold in their parts of the country decreased over time. Since ISIS was kicked out of the city of Hasakah earlier this year, for example, the YPG has gradually taken control over three-quarters of the city, while Syrian soldiers only have a foothold in the remaining quarter. While there have been clashes between the two they have taken steps to ensure they do not escalate. 

Assad has boasted of supplying arms to the YPG to help them against a common adversary and threat. However this is likely just because of the nature of the threat and because he wants to be perceived as an earnest supporter of counter-ISIS efforts in Syria. There is little indication that neither Russia nor the Syrian regime will accept nor tolerate, in the long term, an autonomous Kurdish military force in Rojava, like the Peshmerga in neighboring Iraqi Kurdistan, or even a quasi-autonomous Kurdish polity. Even the United States, which is opposed to the current regime in Damascus, has issued statements insisting that it supports a unified Syria and that its arming of the SDF, of which the YPG is the primary component and driving force, is purely ad-hoc given the few forces on the ground in Syria they have to work with and the pressing nature of the threat posed by ISIS.  

It’s also no secret that the U.S. has been seen supporting a group which is a political offshoot of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). But even in neighboring Iraqi Kurdistan, where the powers that have been long-time allies of the U.S., Washington is still wary about circumventing Baghdad’s central authority and has been rigorously adhering to a One Iraq policy. The same will likely prove to be the case with the Russians in regard to Damascus. The Russians however, may go further and actively either back diplomatically and/or assist militarily a future attempt by Damascus to once again subjugate Rojava under its complete control. While the U.S. would likely condemn such a Syrian move to forcibly disarm the YPG after the ISIS threat is removed it’s extremely doubtful they would fight in defense of Rojava’s hard-won autonomy.

In both Iraq and Syria the Kurds are doing more than their fair share of heavy lifting in the fight against ISIS. In Syria the U.S. is counting on the SDF to march south and free Raqqa. Russia and Syria would likely welcome a protracted SDF war against ISIS to keep the major factions in the northeast preoccupied while they take care of armed groups fighting them closer to home. Remember, neither of them has even managed to pry Palmyra back from ISIS’s grip yet while the SDF has been actively clearing ISIS from villages in Hasakah province. Meaning that any major ISIS defeat in Syria will likely be afflicted by the SDF, not the Syrian army or any other ground force under Assad’s command. Yet the Kurdish force which form the real battle-hardened muscle of the SDF aren’t even being given promises of basic autonomy by neither Damascus nor Moscow for potentially overstretching their forces in a potentially costly offensive to rid Syria of ISIS. 

Similarly in Iraq the Kurdistan Region has expressed its willingness to spare forces for the long anticipated offensive against ISIS in Mosul despite the continued restrictions placed upon them by One Iraq. A policy which hasn’t been challenged by any incumbent Washington administration. 

In conclusion the Kurds should remember that while the great powers have a use for them today they may well view them as disposable tomorrow. Something which wouldn’t, sadly, be unprecedented. 

Paul Iddon is a Rudaw reporter based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


Data pager
Page size:
Ian Birmingham | 27/12/2015
Sad but true, and as a practical matter what this means is that now is the time for the Kurdistan Region to declare its independence. May it happen soon - VERY soon!!
M Gonzales
M Gonzales | 27/12/2015
I see the authors point's I just don't agree. While the Iraqi Kurds have had autonomy for many year's they also have vast resource's to help fund a independent state. The Syrian Kurds have done great things with what little they have but they do not have vast resources or year's of self autonomy behind them. I believe the Iraqi Kurds should be independent but Rojava should seek a autonomous deal with Assad since it's becoming more evident he's not going too be leaving power (Saddam didn't leave power the first war, but the Kurds got autonomy). The YPG should strive for a autonomous deal with the YPG being the security force for the region. Right now the YPG is only small arm's militia and no pay, a U.N. recognized autonomy within Syria would provide protection from a hostile Turkey and with Russian aid better equipment, training and maybe pay. Assad only cares at the moment if the Syrian Kurds want to break away (Would be Turkish sucide), Oppose him and support his enemy's (YPG has been neutral going after only Isis and al-nursa.) And if they can help him cling too power (cutting off the Turkish border helps both Assad and the YPG). When the dust settles after this war ends Assad's going too have decades of rebuilding and hostile Sunnis too deal with, he's not going too care about Rojava autonomy so long as they don't make waves. If Rojava can peacefully exist in Syria it would go along way toward Iran and maybe Turkey giving there Kurds autonomy.
dutchnational | 27/12/2015
It is sad but correct. There is one thing though. The big weapon stashes in the two remaining military bases in Hasakah province. They can easily be overrun in case the SAA turns on them. This will give the kurds the much needed heavy weapons. In my estimation, once Afrin is connected to Kobane, the kurds will not agressively attack IS anymore as there will be no incentive for them. That is, unless either Russia or the US gives it to them.
Remo K
Remo K | 27/12/2015
If the Kurds of Iraq, Syria and Turkey are denied autonomy/independence, then stability will be an alien concept in this part of the world. We highly value SUSTAINABLE development but rarely seek conditions for sustainable coexistence. Neither of superpower could morally justify denying our rights nor impose their will by force anymore.
View | 28/12/2015
Totally agree! Urgent: kurds to unite all their forces for a common stratagy would be welcome.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Leon | 3/24/2019 8:03:06 AM
Sistani is not the governemnt, so get fucked. Iraq should use force to remove him.
Iraqi PM proposes parliament sacks Nineveh governor
| yesterday at 11:47 | (1)
Adam | 3/23/2019 2:49:50 PM
I wander what the Saudi royal family would say.
Gunrash | 3/24/2019 3:10:11 AM
Golan is Israeli just like Kirkuk, Amed, Mehabad and Afrin are Kurdish! Enough with the hypocrisy and selective indignation. UN is a joke.
Trump’s Golan statement draws strong regional condemnation
| yesterday at 08:49 | (4)
Adam | 3/23/2019 2:40:05 PM
Now the west especially America have the duty to reward the Kurds with real protection.
Kurde Canada | 3/24/2019 1:41:08 AM
God is no more with ISIS. They were just being used by him. They were betrayed.
SDF declare ‘total elimination’ of ISIS caliphate
| yesterday at 09:32 | (4)
TerraNova | 3/23/2019 10:02:06 PM
And now you show the world that The United States of America stands by it's allies and dose NOT abandon an ally that sacrificed thousands of brave...
Dutchman | 3/23/2019 11:18:00 PM
Trump is right when he sais that the US together with it's allies defeated ISIS. And it is also good that he wants to continue to work with his...
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’
| 16 hours ago | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Mosul mourns victims of the ferry disaster 4 hours ago |

Mosul mourns victims of the ferry disaster

Grieving Mosul is not celebrating victory over more
Iraqi fishermen flounder on the Shatt al-Arab 15 hours ago |

Iraqi fishermen flounder on the Shatt al-Arab

Iran and Kuwait prevent them from fishing further more
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’ 16 hours ago | (3)

Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’

"We will remain vigilant" more
0.563 seconds