Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Jarablus: Is there any precedent to Turkey's incursion?

By Paul Iddon 31/8/2016
Turkish tank en route to the Syrian border-town of Jarablus. AFP photo.
Turkish tank en route to the Syrian border-town of Jarablus. AFP photo.
Turkey’s military intervention in Syria one week ago, aimed at hitting Syrian Kurdish affiliates of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), is not the first time that Turkish forces have crossed an international border to strike Kurdish rebels.

In 1995, Turkey launched a large-scale incursion (Operation Steel), involving 35,000 soldiers into the Qandil Mountains, but ultimately that failed to uproot the PKK there. Ankara followed that up with Operation Hammer two years later, with at least 30,000 troops. That operation did not end in a decisive victory for the Turkish Army either.  

A similar but much smaller operation commenced in February 2008, and intermittent airstrikes against PKK positions in those mountains continue to the present day.

Also, in 1998 the Turkish military threatened to attack Syria if the regime in Damascus continued to give sanctuary to the leader of the PKK, Abdullah Ocalan. Turkish armor rolled up to the border, compelling then Syrian President Hafez al-Assad to send Ocalan into exile. Ocalan was captured in Kenya less than six months later and has remained in prison in Turkey ever since.

Analysts contacted by Rudaw English noted similarities and differences between Turkey’s previous efforts to reach across international borders to strike at the PKK and its current operations in Syria.

The current operation “is more similar to the 1995 Turkish incursion into Iraq to push out the PKK, which ended up in failure for Turkey, insofar as the PKK stayed and Turkey withdrew,” said Aliza Marcus, author of ‘Blood and Belief: The P.K.K. and the Kurdish Fight for Independence.’

“But overall, I don’t see any parallels with any other Turkish military operation. This one stands on its own,” she added.

Aaron Stein, a Turkish affairs specialist at the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington DC, believes the fact that the Turks never held onto the territory they captured during those past ground operations against the PKK in Qandil is a precedent they should be wary of repeating in northwestern Syria.

“Syria is obviously a unique situation, but Turkey has sent troops over the border into Iraq on numerous occasions to fight the PKK. Those previous incursions, however, failed to hold territory taken, something that Turkish planners must now be mindful of, now that they have committed troops to Syria,” Stein told Rudaw English.

This implies that in order not to repeat the shortcomings of these past Qandil operations, Turkey must seek to establish a more permanent presence in the Jarablus area, where its tanks and soldiers struck to get at the Syrian Kurdish Peoples Protection Units (YPG), the PKK’s affiliate in Syria.

“If this is phase one of a larger operation, perhaps for Al-Bab, then I could see Turkey needing to have a larger presence inside Syria to sustain operations,” Stein said. “If, however, Turkey intends to only hug the border and to push much beyond 20 kilometers, I think they can still run logistics from Soylu, the village near Karkamis where they are currently supporting the operation from.”  

Barin Kayaoglu, a Middle East analyst and assistant professor of history at the American University of Iraq, Sulaimani, believes that a mild comparison at best can be made between the present operations in Syria and Turkey’s past efforts to get at the PKK.

“On the face of it one can look at the Turkish incursion into Syria in the same light as successive Turkish military operations into northern Iraq in the 1990s and 2000s. Neither Baghdad nor Erbil could control or block the PKK’s bases in the Qandil mountains, so the Turks regularly conducted operations there,” Kayaoglu told Rudaw English.

“But at another level,” he added, “there is no precedent for the Turkish operation in Syria, mostly because the Syrian civil war, with the partial exception of the Lebanese civil war, is quite unprecedented. Too many in-country factions, too many outside players, and both U.S. and Russia have assumed direct roles.”

Kayaoglu says Turkey is part of this broader “game”. And while Ankara’s primary aim in Syria is to marginalize the Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) Kayaoglu views Turkey’s present operation as part of “the bigger Turkish interest to be an actor in the Syrian conflict.”

“Ankara wants to have a big say over Syria’s fate, and judging from the US and Russian experiences, bombing this or that target in the country seems to accomplish that goal,” Kayaoglu reasoned.

“Of course, actually ending the bloodshed in Syria is a different matter,” he added.

Paul Iddon is a Rudaw reporter based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.


Data pager
Page size:
M Gonzales
M Gonzales | 31/8/2016
Turkey's Syrian policy is a disaster and currently Turkey's say in Syria's fate has little weight. At the same time Turkey is paranoid and schizophrenic with it's PKK hatred, seeing boogymen behind every tree. Seizing Jarablus for the FSA and then giving the YPG a bloody nose has put the YPG on notice and despite what's bravely said in public, the YPG will tread more carefully. Now if Turkey has any brain's they will then move too sweep all the Isis territory between Manbij and Afrin. This would serve Turkey fourfold. First it would stop the Kurd's dreams of uniting all the canton's and the YPG would be reluctant to reengage the FSA and Turkey if their is a ceasefire holding. Secondly the FSA and Turkey would open up a new front on the SAA in the north and create a "safe zone". Thirdly this would be a huge nationalistic victory for Erdogan and Turkey after the failed coup. It would be a welcome distraction and propaganda for Erdogan. Lastly it would give Turkey more clout and possibly say in Syria's future with Turkey in control of part of northern Syria and it's safezone. All in all, while I can't stand Erdogan because he's a nutjob I can see the tactics in this move.
HAE TURKEY | 31/8/2016
Business | 31/8/2016
Turkey has no business intervening in Syria affair. The Syrian Kurd has every right to fight for independence from Syrian regime and turkey has no business there. They can fight against their own Kurd in turkey but has no right to insist that Syrian Kurd must not have independence in Syria just because they are affiliated with PKK.
Arzi | 31/8/2016
Shame Rudaw you are becoming piece mouth for terrorist state of Turkey and weak journalism. How about you mention the name of Turkish military bases in Southern Kurdistan, Bamarni, Batifa, Kanimasi, Amedya, Deralok and the recent one close to Musal. Those are the bases of Turkish military that I know of and I'm sure there are more . They were invited there by KDP.
Guest | 31/8/2016
The analyst comments in the article make the assumption that the YPG would always be on the defensive but due to the YPG's performance recently this probably wouldn't be the case. A more likely scenario is that if the Turks get aggressive against the YPG then the Syrian/Turkey border will be irrelevant and the YPG will develop a strategy that could encompass southern Turkey's strategic routes, terrain features, major bridges/dams, and facilities critical to Turkey's efforts against the YPG. Coordination with the PKK would also be probable and Turkey would probably find themselves dealing with a major Kurdish uprising causing serious devastation in Turkey similar to what's going on in Syria. Turkey needs to be smart about this and defend their borders, work with the anti-ISIS forces operating in Syria, and continue their efforts to reach an agreement with the PKK in Turkey.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Jay | 3/24/2019 9:20:08 PM
Iraq asks other countries to invest while Iraqi corrupt officials steal all the money, never heard such stupid notion before. Put Maliki on trial,...
Jarush | 3/25/2019 5:30:59 AM
Sure Mahdi can bring investment money from Egypt while Iraqi officials embezzle Iraqi money. What does Egypt has to offer, perhaps Sisi should feed...
Iraq PM courts Egyptian investment at Cairo summit
| yesterday at 10:03 | (2)
Tg | 3/25/2019 4:57:16 AM
Teach the children how to be builders, they learned how to be destroyers through ISIS ideology, to combat evil, you use good, provide them ...
Jihadists emerge from tunnels to surrender after ‘caliphate’ falls
| yesterday at 07:50 | (1)
kurdo | 3/24/2019 9:26:09 PM
Korek has made billions in a few years, charging hefty fees, cheating, stealing credit and all the rest of tricks. It gets more and more users...
Tarek | 3/25/2019 4:49:55 AM
Phone network chaos as regulator orders block on Korek calls
| yesterday at 11:09 | (2)
Leon | 3/24/2019 10:36:12 PM
We all know there are three possibilities: 1) they are dead, 2) they are sold to Turkey, 3) They are sold to Saudi Arabi, 4) some dead and some sold....
SDF try to piece together what happened to ISIS captives
| yesterday at 12:16 | (1)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Bridge linking Iraq to Kurdistan Region ‘may collapse at any moment’ 6 hours ago |

Bridge linking Iraq to Kurdistan Region ‘may collapse at any moment’

"This may bring a catastrophe for us" more
‘No YPG forces’ in Syria safe zone with Turkey: US 7 hours ago |

‘No YPG forces’ in Syria safe zone with Turkey: US

"Turkey feels very nervous about the YPG and more
Syrian group wants international tribunal for ISIS detainees 8 hours ago |

Syrian group wants international tribunal for ISIS detainees

"We can’t put up with this burden alone" more
0.234 seconds