Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Interview

Ex-Turkish Minister: Ankara May Not Get Better Chance for Kurdish Peace

By HEMIN KHOSHNAW 7/8/2013
Former Turkish Foreign Minister Yasar Yakis.
Former Turkish Foreign Minister Yasar Yakis.

  

Yasar Yakis, who became the first Turkish foreign minister in the Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) government after the 2000 election, says there is no better time for Turkey to make peace with its Kurds, and that if this opportunity is missed another one may not come for a very long time. He also told Rudaw that whether or not Syrian Kurds declare autonomy is up to them alone, and Ankara must not look at any option but to have good relations with the Kurds both in Iraq and Syria. Here is his interview:

Rudaw: As you know the Syrian Kurds are attempting to establish an independent administration in Syrian Kurdistan. Do you think such a step is a threat to the neighboring countries in the region?

Yasar Yakis: This would mainly depend on how they implement the process. The Syrian Kurds and the neighboring countries can use this opportunity to serve the peace process in the region. By doing so, both the Syrian Kurds and the neighboring countries would benefit from the process.

Rudaw: Why do you think the meetings between the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) co-leader Salih Muslim and the Turkish officials in Istanbul are underway secretly?

  The Turkish officials’ meeting with Mr. Muslim must be conducted according to the diplomatic measures.  

Yasar Yakis: The Turkish officials’ meeting with Mr. Muslim must be conducted according to the diplomatic measures. Discussing such sensitive issues should be revealed to the media. Otherwise it could restrict the freedom of all involved and eventually lead to abolishment of the whole process. Anyway, everything will be revealed to the public at the right time.

Rudaw: With the establishment of an administration in Syrian Kurdistan, Turkey will become the neighbor of two Kurdish regions instead of one. How do you think this will work out for Turkey?

Yasar Yakis: It is obvious to everyone that Turkey has improved its relations with Iraqi Kurdistan. I want to discuss something that I suggested 13 years ago. Before AKP came to power in 2000, the Turkish government officials were discussing how to oppose the establishment of an autonomous region in Iraqi Kurdistan. They were saying, the Iraqi Kurds were establishing an autonomous region. Their attitude was, “let them do it then we shall show them what we would about it.”

Right before the 2000 elections, one day I walked in to Abdullah Gul’s office with a newspaper in my hand with the headline, “We shall show them what we would do about it”. I told Mr. Gul that what happens in Iraq should be a decision for the Iraqis. The ability of Turkey to influence the future of Iraq is limited. If the Iraqis decide to create an autonomous region in northern Iraq or an independent state then it is their decision. If such a thing happened, the Kurds and Turkey will be legally neighbors forever. So we need to improve our relations with them.

I also told him we would win the election for sure we need to pursue this policy and make it public now. We, the AKP, cannot deny this truth. Mr. Gul supported the idea. After the election, Gul became the prime minister and I the foreign minister. One day, Gul and I were discussing northern Iraq. He told me that I made my case two years ago and as a foreign minister I could now pursue my idea. My response to Gul was that the US was about to invade Iraq and things were changing fast so it was not possible to pursue what I believed.  I believed whatever happened in Iraqi Kurdistan, Turkey must still work to improve its relations with the Kurdish people there.

  I told Mr. Gul that what happens in Iraq should be a decision for the Iraqis. 

Thirteen years have passed since my conversation with Mr. Gul and I am glad to see what I suggested a long time ago has come true today.  Turkey and the Kurdistan Region have strong relations today and both sides have benefited from this friendship.

It is too early to predict what the Syrian Kurds will achieve in the future. However, it is for the Syrians to decide that.  Turkey must aim for friendship with the Syrian Kurds no matter what administration they establish. Turkey must send a clear message to the Syrian Kurds that it has no problem with them. In the meantime, the Syrian Kurds shouldn’t implement a policy to create headaches for Turkey.

Rudaw: Are you saying the establishment of the second Kurdish region is equal to the establishment of the new Turkey?

Yasar Yakis: These two processes are the outcomes of two different dynamics. The process of openness toward the Kurds in Turkey is different from the one in northern Syria that aims to achieve an independent administration. Each one has its own background. The Syrian Kurds made demands for an autonomous Kurdish region back in 1930 during the French colonial rule,  but the French rejected their demands, while the process of openness is the result of an issue that had first emerged in 1830.

These two issues with two different dynamics, if wisely dealt with, can result in benefits for both Turkey and northern Syria.  

  It is too early to predict what the Syrian Kurds will achieve in the future.  

Rudaw: If the Kurdish National Conference succeeds in achieving its goal, which is a political unity for the Kurds throughout the Middle East, don’t you think it would be easier to deal with one voice when resolving Kurdish issue?

Yasar Yakis: It is still unclear whether the Kurds, who live in four different countries of the Middle East, would want to separate. The Kurdish regions in Syria and Iraq are still represented by the Arab nationalists and Ba’ath party, among whom there are some who believe that even some of the Kurdish region in Turkey is part of the Arab states. If these regions declared statehood, they face strong opposition from the Arab states. In addition, we don’t know if these independent regions can become united because, when words are put into practice, it is hard to predict where the competition and ambitions of the leaders will head. All the Arabs speak the same language, but are divided into many countries, so sharing same culture and language is not enough to create unity. Let’s say that the Kurds would overcome all of these obstacles and create a political unity. It still is unclear to say that it is easier to hold discussion with one side.

Rudaw: what are the differences between the current and past peace attempts to resolve the Kurdish issue in Turkey?

Yasar Yakis: Here are the differences: the AKP government is the strongest government in the history of Turkey; it enjoys three seats out of every five parliamentary seats. If AKP and Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) reached an agreement with BDP, they can decide the referendum on the constitution.  Also, the prime minister has a very strong personality. He is willing to take risks if necessary. (Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip) Erdogan has invested all of his energy to make sure the process would succeed. Erdogan is the right leader to resolve the Kurdish issue.

  the AKP government is the strongest government in the history of Turkey; it enjoys three seats out of every five parliamentary seats. 

Another important factor is that the society has come to believe in the process. Negotiation with the PKK (Kurdistan Workers Party) jailed leader (Abdullah Ocalan) is a right step. Ocalan also supports the process. The PKK’s armed wing in the Qandil mountain supports Ccalan’s decisions, and decided to implement them.

Today is the day that the Kurdish issue must be resolved in Turkey. If this process fails, then Turkey must wait a long time for another opportunity to come about.

 

 

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
MedaiKurds | 7/8/2013
Turkey do all they can to avoid any Kurdish autonomy or independence in any place in the world. They accept kurdish reality when they don't have choice anymore. The reason is they are friendly with KRG is because they are making billions of dollars in Kurdistan. But stil we don't get the same favor as so called Palestinian victim! Turkey is definitly a state with two faces. Kurds will paye high price for their naivety regarding Arabs and Turks!
MedaiKurds | 7/8/2013
Turkey do all they can to avoid any Kurdish autonomy or independence in any place in the world. They accept kurdish reality when they don't have choice anymore. The reason is they are friendly with KRG is because they are making billions of dollars in Kurdistan. But stil we don't get the same favor as so called Palestinian victim! Turkey is definitly a state with two faces. Kurds will paye high price for their naivety regarding Arabs and Turks!
Ihsan Köl
Ihsan Köl | 7/8/2013
Turkey is massacring in Rojava right now with his Al Nusra. All those terrorists come from Turkey armed rested and trained. We Kurds know who we are and who our enemies are.
Shinger I
Shinger I | 8/8/2013
@Ihsan Kol, i don't completely agree with you. Yes, we know who we are, but who are enemy is, is just part of the illusion. I mean yes Turkey isn't our friend either in this.. not after the fall of the last Islamic khilafat. If turkey could do whatever they wanted, they would have conquered all Kurdistan this instance. Paying for oil is one thing, but getting it for free is even more rewarding. I don't trust this pokerface of "peace". I mean come on.. use your brains. HE KNOWS that if Rojava gets autonomy or independence, then soon all eyes will be on Bakur and Rojhelat. But showing his pokerface of "peace", will give them to oppertunity to come closer to stab us in the back. How?? Well for once.. they give us money for oil and don't count out, that there IS A CHANCE that they would say to us.. we will stop our friendship if Bakur gets autonomy. Look at the history.. what is our weakest character traits? We fight our own people. We have to be careful and DONT put all of our money on turkey for transporting our oil, but instead use different countrys. It would be awesome if Bakur OR Rojhelat would also be free, so we can use Azerbeidzjan and Armenia to transport our goods. We have been screwed by the 4 country's these 90 years, so it's time to look for friends that haven't screwed us over. History is the treature that lies in the future. Learn from your mistakes, because if they once screwed you over, what will stop them from doing it the second or third time?
IC | 8/8/2013
As a Turk, I believe that the Kurds deserve to be atleast better recognized in the region ( more rights, right to speak their language), or an autonomous region...It is hard to say where it will head but Why oppress? If autonomy is reached why make another enemy? They have been our brothers and sisters for centuries and have stayed by our side in WW1 when even our own Armenian and Arab neighbours back stabbed us.. We can see how being united can achieve anything. Why not united even larger? us Turks and Kurds working together. Instead all I see is even more Polarized Turks within the country and even more, kurds fighting with Turks over irrelevant ideologies when the greater picture for everyone is PEACE. Overall, the region that they would take are 100% Kurd occupied, so in reality we are not losing any land. If we are good terms with Kurds, both governments will have cooperation with each other which will change nothing besides a recognized Kurdish state.
Tags :
4063 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Leon | 3/24/2019 8:03:06 AM
Sistani is not the governemnt, so get fucked. Iraq should use force to remove him.
Iraqi PM proposes parliament sacks Nineveh governor
| yesterday at 11:47 | (1)
Adam | 3/23/2019 2:49:50 PM
I wander what the Saudi royal family would say.
Gunrash | 3/24/2019 3:10:11 AM
Golan is Israeli just like Kirkuk, Amed, Mehabad and Afrin are Kurdish! Enough with the hypocrisy and selective indignation. UN is a joke.
Trump’s Golan statement draws strong regional condemnation
| yesterday at 08:49 | (4)
Adam | 3/23/2019 2:40:05 PM
Now the west especially America have the duty to reward the Kurds with real protection.
Kurde Canada | 3/24/2019 1:41:08 AM
God is no more with ISIS. They were just being used by him. They were betrayed.
SDF declare ‘total elimination’ of ISIS caliphate
| yesterday at 09:32 | (4)
TerraNova | 3/23/2019 10:02:06 PM
And now you show the world that The United States of America stands by it's allies and dose NOT abandon an ally that sacrificed thousands of brave...
Dutchman | 3/23/2019 11:18:00 PM
Trump is right when he sais that the US together with it's allies defeated ISIS. And it is also good that he wants to continue to work with his...
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’
| 16 hours ago | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Mosul mourns victims of the ferry disaster 5 hours ago |

Mosul mourns victims of the ferry disaster

Grieving Mosul is not celebrating victory over more
Iraqi fishermen flounder on the Shatt al-Arab 15 hours ago |

Iraqi fishermen flounder on the Shatt al-Arab

Iran and Kuwait prevent them from fishing further more
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’ 16 hours ago | (3)

Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’

"We will remain vigilant" more
0.391 seconds