Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Kurdistan

PUK won’t strike deal with Iraqi parties without KDP: official

By Nawzad Mahmoud 9/7/2018
Supporters of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) wave banners of their parties during the 2013 legislative election. Photo: Rudaw
Supporters of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) wave banners of their parties during the 2013 legislative election. Photo: Rudaw
SULAIMANI, Kurdistan Region – Farid Asasar, a leading member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), says neither his party nor the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) will unilaterally enter into alliance with Iraqi parties to form a new government in Baghdad. 

“The agreement is mostly intended to ensure that neither the KDP nor the PUK enters into alliance with Iraqi parties without each other, and to form a joint agenda to deal with the alliance forming the next Iraqi government,” Asasar told Rudaw. 

The PUK and KDP delegations met in Erbil last Wednesday. Asasar was one of the delegates in the meeting.

“The KDP and PUK need to form an agenda before commencing formal talks with Iraqi parties. The agenda has been prepared and will be sent to other parties of the Kurdistan Region in order for them to join the agenda,” he said. 

Relations between the KDP and PUK turned sour after the events of October 16, 2017. The KDP has accused some PUK officials of secret coordination with the Iraqi Army and Hashd al-Shaabi forces to attack Kirkuk.

However, Iraq’s parliamentary election has created a new situation that has made the formation of the next Iraqi government very difficult.

This has pushed the KDP and PUK, as regional winners of the election, to sit together and discuss the common ground that still exists between them.

“We have to finally be closer to one party, but shouldn’t discuss our agenda first. We have to discuss the details of the agenda with the person tasked with the formation of the government,” Asasar added.

Iraqi parties have been attempting to create alliances, but none has lasted more than a week. Asasar attributes the reason to “the Shiites house being in disorder.” 

“These parties want to gain the most in forming the government, but they should first reach an agreement among themselves and then try to reach an agreement with other parties,” he said.

The disorderly state of the Shiite parties is bad for them, he said, arguing that if they remain divided as they are now, “the situation will remain in stalemate. Then there will be no parties in Baghdad which we can talk to. In these situations, the Kurds will remain without forming an alliance with other parties. If we form an alliance with [Muqtada al-Sadr], Hadi Amri will surely oppose us, and Sadr will oppose us if we do otherwise. That is why unanimity among them will save us a number of problems.”

There are claims the alliance between Amri and Nouri al-Maliki is eager to win the hearts of the Kurds by promising to return to the pre-2014 situation – before Maliki’s government cut the Kurdistan Region’s budget. Asasar said this is “very good for Kurds.”

But by forming an alliance with them, “we will be viewed as being in Iran’s sphere. Then we will have many problems with the US,” Asasar explained.

He said much depends on the outcome of the manual recount of ballots cast in the disputed May 12 election and what the Kurdish opposition parties choose to do next.

“We and the KDP should wait for Gorran, CDJ, Komal and KIU to go to Baghdad. We will wait for these four parties until the time the final election results are approved. We will then be talking to them, but will go to Baghdad with the KDP if they don’t come with us,” he said.

“The thing we have called an alliance with the KDP is only for a specific phase. It might dissolve with the formation of the new Iraqi cabinet. Then we will need another form of relations. We will either form a joint bloc or be there as different factions,” he said.

Some Gorran officials recently slammed CDJ leader Barham Salih, accusing him of trying to secure position for himself – even the presidency of the republic. The KDP recently said the PUK is not entitled to the position.

But Asasar believes the PUK will hold onto the presidency.

“The KDP will finally consent to the PUK assuming the position. The assumption of this position by the PUK will determine the kind of relations between the KDP and PUK. If the PUK assumes this position and the KDP doesn’t cause problems for this to be the case, we might then determine a new foundation for relations between the KDP and PUK. However, a roadmap for relations with the KDP will not be designed if this is not going to be the case,” he warned.

“We will nominate one of our officials to assume the position of the president of the republic. We will not give this position to Dr Barham,” he said. “Under these conditions, we cannot nominate someone outside the PUK for the position of the president of the republic.”

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
Muraz Adzhoev | 9/7/2018
All are “divided” and the political process in Iraq is in chaotic “disorder”, because artificial Iraqi federation is deadly failed and divided already, and this is exactly what should be stated in Kurdistan’s “agenda before commencing formal talks with Iraqi parties”. PUK must stop its shameful double-dealing political “game”, bring order and cleanliness in its party ranks and leadership. Enough. The first issue in the Kurdish agenda should be territorial integrity and independence of Southern Kurdistan in accordance with the political, national and patriotic will of the self-determined People. Formal talks with Iraqi parties on the formation of a “magical Government” are absolutely useless, but will prove that Iraq is dead.
KRG | 10/7/2018
United in corruption and dividig Kurdistan
Majd | 10/7/2018
Muraz the only thing that’s dead is your dirty mind . Iraq is alive and people like you will be kissinbhanda soon and begging for positions. So talk none sense as much as you want . Iraq will Stay and we proved it to you recently in October . Do you want a reminder ?
Brutus | 11/7/2018
The Kurds were some the first who thought about the idea of a nation not only in the 16th centuries but also 2600 years ago. But while knowing what to do for some reason they did not do it. From what I am told it’s locals fault mostly those big landowners that feared to lose their land to their state and taxation. But now they face losing it to terrorists and sneaky criminals. But guess what the Kurds actually managed to outmaneuver themselves from participating in the oil age which is obviously is over now. It’s almost over approximately 10 years and instead of hoping to make some gains in that area they should pay back as much as possible and burn their oppressors states down that funded terrorism against the Kurds with the stolen oil of the Kurds.
Jay | 11/7/2018
It did already, it gave away Kirkuk without the approval of KDP.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Kam | 9/25/2018 10:26:39 AM
Failure . Simple . No other explanation . Don’t try and hide it . It’s too late . FYI . No one cares what you really want . Wake up .
Fellow Kurds, why blame yourself for wanting independence?
| 17 hours ago | (1)
Fret | 9/25/2018 7:22:41 AM
yeah yeah yeah, and in a few months Trump will announce "a summit" with Khamanee, and throw all their allies under the bus. Khamanee will of course...
Hiwa | 9/25/2018 8:04:25 AM
Kurdish price for this should be full return of every inch of "disputed" territory. Finel status that all those Kurdish areas are offically part of...
Pompeo: US seeking 'Iraqi national government' to counter Iran's influence
| 21 hours ago | (3)
Michael | 9/25/2018 7:42:55 AM
Extremely good summery, many of us feel the same, thank you
Peleng | 9/25/2018 7:58:30 AM
In my opinion the real mistake was for all Peshmerga retreating when the Iraqi/Iranian forces moved in. We know that the PUK ordered their forces to...
Critics of Kurdistan’s historic independence vote remain misguided
| 21 hours ago | (2)
pete | 9/25/2018 6:16:38 AM
I had to give up reading as soon as I got to the ENKS propaganda against PYD. ENKS are traitors who work for Turkey against Rojava, and are a...
Pete | 9/25/2018 7:38:20 AM
Rojava is a direct democracy. It is not “ruled” by PYD. ENKS is allied with Turkey and has no relationship to Rojava in any way. ENKS is not a “rival...
PYD turns 15: What next for Rojava?
| yesterday at 08:43 | (5)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

A week on, refugee agency trying to repatriate bodies of Kurds from Turkey 12 hours ago |

A week on, refugee agency trying to repatriate bodies of Kurds from Turkey

Turkish police have arrested six smugglers in more
Kurdistan independence referendum: Was it worth it? 15 hours ago |

Kurdistan independence referendum: Was it worth it?

Did its consequences merit holding the referendum more
Parliament speaker stresses national consensus on presidency in talks with PUK 16 hours ago |

Parliament speaker stresses national consensus on presidency in talks with PUK

Halbousi “insisted on the importance of getting more
0.562 seconds