Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Kurdistan

Will Kirkuk finally break away from Iraq? “Unacceptable” says Baghdad

By Ali Kurdistani 15/6/2016
A man walking in the local market of downtown Kirkuk. Photo: Farzin Hassan/Rudaw
A man walking in the local market of downtown Kirkuk. Photo: Farzin Hassan/Rudaw

Kirkuk is a longstanding unresolved issue between the Kurds and Baghdad. It has been described as the Jerusalem of Iraq and sometimes as a powder keg that will remain a threat to the country even if all other political issues are solved.

After the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime in 2003 there was hope that this issue would be resolved, especially after the Kurds and American added Article 140 to the Iraqi constitution that said the province’s transformed demographics be reversed to its old reality before giving the people the chance to decide their future in a referendum.

By 2007 Article 140 was supposed to have been fully implemented and Kirkuk was expected to be either part of Iraq or the Kurdistan Region, officially. That did not happen.

Now the governor, Najmaldin Karim, talks of breaking with Baghdad and forming an independent region for Kirkuk. He is disappointed with the central government for not paying the province any of its petrodollars for a year and a half, practicing discrimination against the local Kurdish, Arab and Turkmen population in employment opportunities and meddling too much in local administrational affairs.

 All of Kirkuk’s revenue goes to Baghdad but they do not share any of it with us,  

Karim says he would pursue this project relying on the inhabitants of the province and that he has spoken about it with Kurdish leaders in Erbil, with Iran, Turkey, US, EU and the UN.

Ahmad Askari, a member of the provincial council shares the governor’s frustrations, saying, “Baghdad trades on Kirkuk’s oil and we do not see the revenue,”

Askari hints at breaking away from Baghdad by saying that with its oil resources Kirkuk can live happily on its own.

“All of Kirkuk’s revenue goes to Baghdad but they do not share any of it with us,” he told Rudaw. “If they let us we can afford our life with our internal income and oil sales that can provide enough for a living and salaries.”

At this point however, an independent Kirkuk region is only an idea and nothing near a formal proposal.

“The idea of Kirkuk independence has not been officially discussed or proposed anywhere,” says Rebwar Talabani, acting head of the provincial council. “The governor of Kirkuk has spoken about the options and alternatives for the future of Kirkuk, including independence of Kirkuk.”

 After the eight years people can decide on whether to stay with Baghdad or join Kurdistan,  

Talabani said that they believe Baghdad is practicing a bad policy towards Kirkuk “and using the province as a trump card against KRG [Kurdish government],”

The Kurds fought Iraq militarily and constitutionally for decades over Kirkuk which they want to be part of the Kurdistan Region that has been autonomous for a quarter century.

Others believe that turning Kirkuk into an independent region would make it almost impossible in the future to become part of Kurdistan.

“A Kirkuk region will have its own parliament, government, presidency and judicial system, just like the KRG once these institutions are well established, the two regions will diverge and evolve independently. Thereafter, a reunion with KRG become irrelevant, if not impossible” Professor Dalawer Ala’Adeen, President of Erbil-based the Middle East Research Institute (MERI) told Rudaw.

Yet some argue that an independent Kirkuk would put the Kurds in a stronger position vis-à-vis Baghdad.

“From the Kurds perspective, interestingly, if there is to be a confederal Iraq, with several sovereign regions coming together, then it may be in the Kurds' interests to have Kirkuk exist as another separate, Kurdish-associated, region, which would then give the Kurds heightened power in any confederal assembly in Baghdad,” said Gareth Stansfield, Professor of Middle East Politics at the Exeter University. 

The Turkmen population who a decade ago strongly opposed any such project and remained committed to Baghdad, also appear to be for an independent region which they see as a solution or at least a good transition.

 For the sake of its diverse population Kirkuk should be the shared responsibility of the Iraqi federal government and the Kurdish regional government,  

“We find it necessary to have an independent region for Kirkuk, but only for eight years, and then it is going to be possible to hold a referendum in this city,” Riyaz Sari Kahiya, a Turkmen lawmaker in Kirkuk, told Rudaw. “After the eight years, the people can decide their future on whether to stay with Baghdad or join Kurdistan, or stay as an independent region forever.”

Hassan Toran, a Turkmen MP in the Iraqi parliament also believes that “proposing a federal region for Kirkuk is constitutional,”

Talabani explains that what brought the Arabs and Turkmen to the side of an independent region was the arrival of the Islamic State (ISIS) and the threat it poses to Kirkuk.

For its part, the International Crisis Group (ICG) which has been researching and writing on Kirkuk for a decade and its potential for conflict due to its multiethnic structure believes that a good option would be a joint Erbil-Baghdad responsibility for Kirkuk.

“We at the International Crisis Group have long held the position that for the sake of its diverse population Kirkuk should be the shared responsibility of the Iraqi federal government and the Kurdish regional government,” Joost Hiltermann, head of the Middle East and North Africa at ICG told Rudaw. “Various models are possible, but that's the basic principle. The zero-sum game mentality nurtured by both sides can only lead to perpetual conflict,”

Whether it the idea of an independent region comes to fruition or not, observers believe deciding the future of the province is not an easy task. “Kirkuk Province is complex and hard to govern,” warns Dr. Ala’Adeen of MERI. “There are many stakeholders who need to be engaged before its future is determined. Any hasty decision without careful planning may lead to disastrous consequences.”

Stansfield who had served as a Senior Political Adviser to the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) in 2009 believes the situation has been too politicized. “Regarding all sides working together, it is a nice idea, and Kirkuk has a long history of fairly decent inter communal relations (although with some appalling moments of violence too). But the situation is now so politicized that I fear notions of cross communal governance coming together in Kirkuk may be difficult to implement.” 

As governor Karim hopes to sell his idea for an independent region to the local population and regional powers, as he put it in a Rudaw interview this week, the Iraqi side remains as opposed to any such plan as has ever been.

  An autonomous Kirkuk is the single largest threat against the long-term strategy of Kurdish nationhood in the Middle East,  

“This is unacceptable and unconstitutional,” Iraq’s former Iraqi national security advisor Moffak Al-Rubaiyee told Rudaw. “Kirkuk should enjoy its unique status as a federal unit within Iraq and according to the constitution.”

“Kirkuk is part of Iraq and does not have any special relations with KRG,” Al-Rubaiyee said. 

Even Iraq’s Sunnis who briefly appeared to advocate a federal region of their own, oppose the idea. “I do not accept nor like the idea of making Kirkuk an independent region and do not like this for other Iraqi provinces including Basra,” says Anbar governor Suhaib al-Rawi.

Some Kurds too are against the idea of an independent Kirkuk region, not for the sake of Iraq’s unity, but journalist and analyst from Kirkuk argues, anything other than its outright attachment to Kurdistan will undo what the Kurds have been fighting for over the years.

“It should be quite clear for both the Kurdish public and also those who favor an autonomous region for Kirkuk that this option is the single largest threat against the long-term strategy of the Kurdish nationhood in the Middle East,” Qurbani wrote in a column on Rudaw this week. “It also poses immediate threats to the geography of Kurdistan and the Kurdish population in Kirkuk.”

 

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
M Gonzales
M Gonzales | 15/6/2016
The Governor of Kirkuk in his lust for power is willing sacrifice the Kurds dream of independence just so long as he can have his mini Kirkuk kingdom. Traitor
Help the Ezidis | 15/6/2016
Of course tries Baghdad to hinder the unity from Kirkuk with the KRG: is there one point in which Baghdad helps the KRG? No! It is the pressure of the US and the EU that Baghdad give some military equipment too late and too less to the KRG for instance. The KRG has his own agenda and it would be wise to follow that and you can have excellent relations as an independent state with Baghdad, but what will happen with the remain of Iraq: will it stay independent or are there other states which have interest in a part: Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, Syria? But that is not the problem of the KRG: so go on with your referendum and make no doubt that the arabization of Kirkuk by Saddam is not a guideline for the future of Kirkuk!
Remo K
Remo K | 15/6/2016
After plundering Kurdish oil for 90 years (BP and others), Saddam's Arabisation of Kirkuk and Al-Anfal genocide we the Kurds are still acting fairly and with compassion against our oppressors!! What about retribution, pay back, compensation for the material and human lives lost and justice in general? By letting Sunni Arabs off the hook, we ourselves create a moral hazard, we encourage further atrocity to occur in future. Kirkuk is Jerusalem of KRG and should never be allowed to secede from Kurdistan.
KPatriot | 15/6/2016
The Arabs won't ever give us Kirkuk peacefully. I know some of you will say it's too harsh, but we should deport every Arab who can not prove they lived in Kirkuk prior to the Arabization of it, South of Kirkuk. How many places can the Arabs take over, then claim they've lived there since dawn of history? They have done it in all of North Africa and Middle East. Typical natioanlist Arabs, coming to a land 100 years ago and claming its theirs and then even claiming the true inbahitabnts are occupiars etc. To laugh of... There's a thing called stupidly nice, we Kurds are stupidly nice to our enemies. We need to re-Kurdify Kirkuk and all other Kurdish regions ASAP, while we have the chance.
KPatriot | 15/6/2016
Why has the fight between Kurds and our occupiars been so hard for us and easy for them? Because we're honest and fair, we don't like to use dirty methods, but when should we learn we are dealing only with dirty people who only use dirty methods? We need to meet them with the same stick. I fully agree with Remo K.
10341 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Kanee ayoub | 12/17/2018 11:49:14 PM
Thank you
pre-Boomer Marine brat | 12/18/2018 1:00:13 AM
According to Reuters late Monday, Erdogan is saying Trump "gave a positive response" to Turkish plans to move east of the Euphrates.
Turkey offensive in Syria ‘a bad idea’ warns US rep Jeffrey
| 23 hours ago | (4)
guest2002 | 12/17/2018 8:11:42 PM
Why apologize?? For telling the truth???
Coalition spokesman apologizes for sharing tweet ‘insulting’ Turkey
| yesterday at 10:56 | (1)
FAUthman | 12/17/2018 4:55:36 PM
Erdogan hints at possible "room for negotiation with the US", according to VOA!.....hmmmmm!"Although Erdogan said that Turkey could start an...
FAUthman | 12/17/2018 7:16:25 PM
Erdogan says US should "fulfill its promises" to Turkey. But he leaves us guessing at what these promises could be by not telling us what they are....
How feasible is a no-fly zone for Rojava?
| 15/12/2018 | (12)
Unite | 12/17/2018 11:56:57 AM
I beg you unite put down your pride and unite put down your differences and unite this is the chance dont forget kobane we standed with you and will...
alfred | 12/17/2018 3:49:20 PM
kurds should not be stupid to have wrong pride. and for sure - all fractions ,parties of the kurds from all regions must stand together for their...
UPDATE: SDF rejects Peshmerga offer to bolster Syria-Turkey border: monitor
| 16/12/2018 | (13)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

German FM Heiko Maas arrives for talks in Erbil 7 hours ago |

German FM Heiko Maas arrives for talks in Erbil

He earlier met with Iraqi President Barham Salih more
Why doesn’t Iraq do more to prevent Turkish airstrikes? 8 hours ago |

Why doesn’t Iraq do more to prevent Turkish airstrikes?

Iraq’s foreign ministry summoned the Turkish more
Iraq’s political deadlock grinds on as ministerial posts remain unfilled 9 hours ago |

Iraq’s political deadlock grinds on as ministerial posts remain unfilled

All the while, the problems of Iraqis are going more
0.625 seconds