Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

Did America’s 2003 Invasion of Iraq Create ISIS?

By DAVID ROMANO 2/1/2015
-
-

On his personal website, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer offers us “Seven impressions of a difficult journey” from his week spend with the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Shams.  He finishes his reflection with a statement that has become a truism in many circles: “We are now paying the price for George W. Bush’s act of near-unparalleled folly; the invasion of Iraq.”  

Let us leave aside for a moment how American and British officials lied to justify and sell the war to their publics (although we should remember that they deceived the public about their evidence for WMD – they really did believe Saddam possessed such weapons). The Todenhofer discourse relies on the very problematic, implicit assumption that Saddam’s regime would have been preferable to the current situation. Although the likes of Todenhofer might have enjoyed being a guest of the Ba’athists when he visited Mosul in 2002 or Damascus more recently, the Ba’athist Republic of Fear hardly seems better than the Islamic State of Terror.  

Going by the gruesome numbers, the Iraqi Ba’athists (and now the Syrian Ba’athists as well) killed far more people. In 1987-88, almost 200,000 Iraqi Kurdish civilians died in the regime’s genocidal anfal campaigns. In 1991, similar numbers of Shiites perished as Baghdad crushed a rebellion in the south. Iraq’s 1980 invasion of Iran led to the deaths of more than a million people, and the invasion of Kuwait scarred yet another neighbor. Throughout the 1990s, Christians, Kurds and Turkmen were ethnically cleansed from places like Kirkuk. Under the sanctions and “oil for food” program of the 1990s, Saddam’s regime systematically prevented the distribution of food to southern Shiite parts of the country, leading to the deaths of some 500,000 children while Baghdad suffered from an obesity problem during the same years (and also while the Kurdish-administered north, under the same international sanctions plus additional sanctions from Baghdad, enjoyed a significant decrease in child mortality).  

In 2003 Saddam seemed poised to emerge victorious from a crumbling, untenable sanctions regime. If he had done so, would he have refrained from resuming his various weapons programs and adventures in the region? This is a better counterfactual hypothesis than a false one juxtaposing the Islamic State’s rampage with a happy, stable Iraq under Saddam. When the Arab Spring rolled around, we might also have seen a Shiite uprising against Saddam, supported by Teheran and Damascus, that would have competed well with the present carnage in Syria. Instead of the Islamic State, we might be writing about the “State of Ali in Mesopotamia and its Environs,” which we could dub “the SAME.” At the same time that Saddam did his best to crush the revolt, he would no doubt have supported Sunni rebels in Syria the way he did during the 1982 Muslim Brotherhood uprising there.

But surely the power vacuum that the United States created in Iraq led to the emergence of al Qaeda in Iraq, which later metastyzed into ISIS? Yes and no. Paul Bremer’s overnight disbanding of the regular Iraqi Army (rather than just the Republican Guard) and too deep de-Ba’athification did create quite the vacuum.  By 2011, however, the insurgency in Iraq was tamed and the Iraqi Army was better equipped than in 2003. It was Nuri al-Maliki’s government that completely alienated Iraq’s Sunnis, eviscerated Iraq’s Constitution and turned Iraq’s new military into his own sectarian and corrupt force. This allowed ISIS forces thriving in the Syrian civil war to return to Iraq.  The Americans cannot be absolved of all blame in the matter, of course, especially since they enabled Maliki even after he turned authoritarian. 

One might just as easily blame the British and French for creating Iraq and Syria in the first place, however. The whole blame discourse does not appear particularly useful in any case. It sounds like a broken record played by those more interested in grinding their political axes back home than looking at the problems in the region. Foreign jihadis going to join ISIS today are not doing so because America invaded Iraq in 2003. Nor does this have that much to do with why Boko Haram, al Shabab, Abu Sayaf, the Taliban and others are massacring their way across other parts of the Muslim world. Although Western imperialism and colonialism are part of the world’s history, these scourges were not limited to Muslim lands.

David Romano has been a Rudaw columnist since 2010. He is the Thomas G. Strong Professor of Middle East Politics at Missouri State University and author of The Kurdish Nationalist Movement (2006, Cambridge University Press) and co-editor (with Mehmet Gurses) of Conflict, Democratization and the Kurds in the Middle East (2014, Palgrave Macmillan).

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
Kurdistan | 2/1/2015
Excellent described. What for sure led Isis (another subsitute for Al qaida) in Iraq, was Al maliki as first cause and the American leaving Iraq in 2011. American soldiers should have stayed in Iraq just like they stayed in Germany after WW2. Obama administration failed here. If it was Bush administration, we would not have ended with Isis here. I hope the Americans will always stay in Kurdistan.
KH (American) | 2/1/2015
The more I hear about this Todenhöfer, the more it sounds like he's a demagogue who lives to validate his own world view. I can't fault his bravery, going into ISIS-held territory, but they had to know before letting him in that he would weave exactly the kind of narrative they want him to, because it serves his own political ends to do so. It's the only reason they'd allow it.
Hersh | 2/1/2015
Excellent piece, couldn't agree more, some leftist individuals try to fit any conflict into their agenda of anti Americanism, if you notice the same people that make the claim that this IS problem is because of US intervention in Iraq also claim that the problem in Syria is dew to the US NOT intervening. These conspiracy nuts have a huge audience here in Middle East, in fact conspiracy theories are the favorite sport of both governments and the people here, mostly because it's a great way to wash our hands of any responsibility, everything is blamed on Israel or the US or... who ever is convenient.
Marcopolo | 2/1/2015
as long as saddam was in power, no islamic organizations would have dared to challenge the Iraqi state. furthermore, even Islamic tregime in iran had been contained by the saddam regime.. yes, based on what we klnow about saddam regime, invasion of iraq in fact contributed to and facilitated the emrgence of islamic gangs such as ISIS, ALQaede, eshabol hagh, mehdi army and iraqi based hezbolah.
ARGUSHI (USA) | 2/1/2015
NO WAY. DOES ANYONE THINK THAT DICTATOR SADAAM WAS ANY BETTER THAN THESE EVIL ISIS. HE WAS DOING THE SAME THINGS. THE ONLY DIFFERENT HE DID NOT SHOW THE WORLD HOW EVIL HE WAS. WE THANK US FOR GETTING RID OF HIM.
Tags :
8056 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

America First | 2/21/2018 1:03:11 PM
Why should US pay money for Iraq or Peshmerga wzy they dont pay their own armies? Begging to get paied and feeded line babies is the only thing...
pre-Boomer Marine brat | 2/21/2018 1:09:23 PM
America doesn't have a President. It has a Twitter account.
US excludes Peshmerga salaries from 2019 budget proposal
| 5 hours ago | (2)
help the kurds | 2/21/2018 10:51:34 AM
Get out of Syria terrorist Turkey. You did not like the Kurds beating your partner ISIS. Only reason u r attacking innocent Kurds.
Jarush | 2/21/2018 11:11:16 AM
This man has made whole Turkey like hell for all who oppose him, why is he talking about providing safety in another country, never heard a man full...
Erdogan to lay siege to Afrin city center 'to ensure safety'
| yesterday at 01:25 | (6)
franzmaximilian | 2/21/2018 8:58:33 AM
Now it is fully clear. What Iraq does not accept is the "free admission" of westerners in Kurdistan without visa. What they cannot see is that this...
ScrewAbadi | 2/21/2018 8:59:06 AM
At this point with Iraq elections only two or three months away. The kurds should just hold out and wait for a new PM and Abadi to lose. They should...
Baghdad will lift flight ban only when ‘conditions are met’
| 20 hours ago | (9)
Richard | 2/21/2018 8:03:08 AM
Abadi isn't negotiating, he is demanding. Negotiations include compromise and there is not of that evident. He has been bolstered by the In...
ISIS, elections, women, Erbil-Baghdad talks top Kubis briefing to Guterres
| 10 hours ago | (1)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Security forces detain suspect after offices shot up in Chamchamal 4 hours ago |

Security forces detain suspect after offices shot up in Chamchamal

unknown gunmen opened fire on the directorate more
US excludes Peshmerga salaries from 2019 budget proposal 5 hours ago | (2)

US excludes Peshmerga salaries from 2019 budget proposal

2019 budget seeks $850 million to train and equip more
Battle to free Mosul of ISIS 'intellectual terrorism' 5 hours ago |

Battle to free Mosul of ISIS 'intellectual terrorism'

The ulema aim to set up 'brigades' more
0.203 seconds