Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

The Price of Selling Out the Kurds

By 9/11/2017
-
-

By Amb. Dennis Ross

I often take part in what's known as "track II diplomacy" — brainstorming discussions with former officials and academics that explore options for breaking major international impasses or ending conflicts. In one that just concluded, two of my longtime acquaintances from the Middle East greeted me with, "Well, once again America's word is no good. How could you abandon the Kurds?"

My Middle Eastern colleagues were calling attention to what has recently taken place in northern Iraq. There, the Iraqi military, with the clear involvement of Iranians and the Shia militias, pushed Kurdish forces out of Kirkuk, including the oil fields, and back to the positions they held prior to ISIS having taken Mosul in 2014. Crossing points to Syria have also been taken from the Kurds.

My argument to the group — that the Kurdish leader, Masoud Barzani, strategically blundered in holding an ill-advised referendum on independence and was responsible for what had happened — fell on deaf ears. In the eyes of my Arab colleagues, even if the Trump administration tried and failed to dissuade Barzani from taking this step, the U.S. could not afford to allow the Kurds to be defeated in such a manner, particularly with the Iranians playing a direct role in the reestablishment of the central government's position in Kirkuk.

For them, the Kurds were an American partner — one we had protected since 1991 with the creation of a "no-fly" zone shortly after the end of the Gulf War. One we rushed to support in the fight with ISIS when the Iraqi military had simply collapsed in 2014 and only the peshmerga was prepared to resist it.

Now we stood on the sidelines. My friends noted the contrast with the Russians, who had stood by the Assad regime, and secured it. Small wonder, I was told, that for the first time in the history of Saudi Arabia, the king had just visited Moscow. No doubt, they said, he had gone "to hedge his bets and to take account of the new Russian role in the region."

Everyone in the region now knew that if their security was threatened, Moscow was the place to look for help. Even the Israelis get this. "Look," I was told, "how many times Netanyahu has gone to Moscow."

Over two days of discussion, I repeatedly heard about the gap between American rhetoric and actions in the region. One of the participants even said, "At least Obama told us he was not going to do anything."

We need not accept these arguments. But we cannot ignore or dismiss this growing perception in the region.

President Trump's words are certainly tough, threatening to pull out of the nuclear deal and declaring that we will counter Iran's destabilizing activities in the region. CIA Director Mike Pompeo echoed his boss' words, citing "the threats from Iran...and the Shia militias, including what we see in northern Iraq...We need to push back against QF (the Quds Force), the IRGC (Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps) more broadly, and the Iranian regime itself."

But our actions belie that posture. Speaking recently, national security adviser H.R. McMaster said that 80% of the forces fighting for Syrian President Bashar Assad are sponsored by Iran. Yet Defense Secretary James Mattis, while acknowledging the Iranian threat and role in Syria, said that we have "an anti-ISIS strategy in Syria, not an anti-Iranian strategy."

In reality, at a time when the Iranians are creating facts on the ground in Iraq and Syria, we remain riveted on defeating ISIS. The Iranians are preparing for the day after — and we are not.

The lesson: Rhetorical hostility toward Iran must be guided by intelligent policy. If we want the Europeans to join us in addressing the vulnerabilities of the Iranian nuclear deal, they have to see a clear diplomatic plan — one that doesn't just make threats but that recognizes their concerns about not renegotiating the deal.

Similarly, if we want the Saudis, Emirates and others to work with us in the region and help carry the burden of filling the vacuum after the defeat of ISIS, they must see we are taking steps to, at a minimum, contain the Iranians in Syria and in the region. If the Russians could transform the balance of power in Syria with just a fraction of the air power we have in the region, is it impossible for us to convey that we won't tolerate the further spread of Iranian and Shia militia presence there?

Standing by as the Kurds were forced to retreat has sent a message far more powerful than the administration's words on Iran. After two days of hearing Middle Easterners lament the gap between the rhetoric and the reality of the Trump administration policies, I left feeling that it is time for the administration either to scale back what it claims it will do or actually begin to marry actions to our words.

Dennis Ross is the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at The Washington Institute. He previously served as a special assistant to President Obama and was an ambassador who guided policy under the George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton administrations.

Published with the permission of ©2017 The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. First published by New York Daily News.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
ehh | 10/11/2017
We have to do the sword dance for trump and shower him with compliments. The referendum was not ill timed. They were going to do this in any case. Was just a matter of time before they were done enough with isis. Like many already stated. But very much agree with the article.
COMMUNIST | 10/11/2017
this was a american sellout more than anything else. whoever was in on this with the shiaa jihadists betrayed america, democratic values, and everything west is built on. (west = classic west)
BismarkPA | 10/11/2017
To my fellow Americans I completely agree with the author of this article. Please write your elected officials and demand that we stand by the Kurds against the Iranian threat to them. We look like fools in the eyes of our allies since we talk big but will not support our allies. This insane policy of supporting Tehran's puppet Baghdad needs to stop now. To the Kurds many of us are demanding our government support your bid for independence.
Enkiu | 10/11/2017
Let me put this bluntly: America's word has turned to s h i t and not just in Kurdistan. People from OUTSIDE the region are also looking at what is happening in Kurdistan and REASSESSING how much they can rely an alliances with the USA. Personally, I am waiting to see what the USA does in Rojava to make a final conclusion.
Harland | 10/11/2017
LOL as if Trump is in control of American foreign policy. The unelected government is in charge and they have a proven track record of blunders and betrayals.
4454 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Anthony | 2/23/2018 2:24:40 AM
As far as the USA is concerned they have lost a huge amount of trust in the eyes of the YPG/J Syrian Kurd's due to it's very tame almost silent...
Anthony | 2/23/2018 2:46:03 AM
@FAUthman I have seen you comment on many sites and I know you are a Turkish bot!To fix your lies and hopefully folk will understand that Afrin has...
Assad in Afrin: Possible ramifications of Damascus' deployment
| yesterday at 08:15 | (8)
Beltor | 2/22/2018 12:06:35 PM
There goes more Kurdish land. I thought turkish intervention would lose kurds soil in only Afrin. Looks like everythings gone in sheik maqsood. Talk...
kurd | 2/23/2018 2:21:27 AM
hooora, Rojawa kurds got their independence, these trolls of PKK who are happy for teh arrival of syrian and irani forces in afrin, are...
Syrian-regime loyalists enter Kurdish-held areas of Aleppo city
| yesterday at 01:54 | (2)
Outsider | 2/22/2018 9:13:42 PM
There may have arrived 100, max 200 shia militias in Afrin. And they will not really assist the YPG at the front but try to defend 2 Shia dominated...
Turan | 2/23/2018 12:16:00 AM
Everyone knows that the convoy was carrying terrorists and weapons hostile to Turkey. Since when 30 busses carry civilians middle of the night? they...
YPG deployed to Afrin, leaving Aleppo for Damascus
| 20 hours ago | (5)
Muraz Adzhoev | 2/22/2018 9:13:06 PM
What does “the administration of border crossings” mean in accordance with the Constitution? What about the border security and defense matters? How...
dilan | 2/22/2018 9:43:31 PM
customs falls under KRG control, otherwise anyone can smuggle out anything out of south kurdistan and KRG gets the blame.
Initial agreement exists for federal authority at Kurdistan borders
| 18 hours ago | (2)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

UN to vote on amended draft 'demanding' ceasefire in Syria 4 hours ago |

UN to vote on amended draft 'demanding' ceasefire in Syria

'demands' a ceasefire, instead of 'decides' more
In pictures: People raise Assad, Ocalan portraits side by side 5 hours ago |

In pictures: People raise Assad, Ocalan portraits side by side

Pro-Assad forces have arrived in waves more
McGurk in or out as special envoy to the anti-ISIS coalition? 6 hours ago |

McGurk in or out as special envoy to the anti-ISIS coalition?

“Brett McGurk isn't going anywhere more
0.39 seconds