Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

Kurds should strengthen hand in Baghdad through parliament, not presidency

By REBWAR KARIM WALI 12/4/2018
.
.
Irrespective of the result of Iraq’s next elections and the parties’ gloomy slogans, the aim behind all of them is to secure key positions in Baghdad. 

Iran’s policy from the beginning of the liberation of Iraq up to now has been unchanged. That policy has been to ensure that the position of prime minister is occupied by a Shiite who has absolute allegiance to Iran and that the ceremonial position of the country’s president be held by a Kurd rather than a Sunni Arab in order to undermine the Arab identity of the country. 

After Jalal Talabani was elected president of the country for his second term, it became apparent that the Kurds have no executive or legislative power in Baghdad. The Kurds have been distracted with a ceremonial position.

The insistence of a Kurd occupying this position has not been based on a strategic goal, but rather on appeasing the desire of Talabani who wanted to fill this position right from the beginning of writing the constitution. 

The intent was for Barzani and Talabani to play a role in the governance of Iraq. However, the Talabani family inherited the presidency position and it was taken more as a source of income rather than a political position. 

That is why over the past four years, despite all the constitutional violations by Baghdad, the president of the republic has not had the courage even once to prove himself as the guardian of the constitution. 

The president of the republic didn’t play any decisive roles with respect to problems between Erbil and Baghdad, even when the constitutional court convened to discuss the question of Kurdistan Region’s budget and finally ruled in favor of Erbil. 

He was either neutral or merely hopeful. He only spoke up and filed a lawsuit against the speaker of the parliament over the issue of the country’s 2018 budget when he knows that he will leave his position in a few months. 

This is mere acting on his part and he knows that it is futile because what has been done with respect to the constitution cannot now be undone. 

Had the president of the republic taken a stance on the referendum question of the Kurdistan Region, many of these bad things wouldn’t have happened.
 
Who will be the next president of the republic? 

Because the position of the Kurdistan Region president has now been dissolved, disputes over positions of power in Erbil and Baghdad have ended. 

The position of the KDP on this is clear. It’s said that the position of the president of the republic is the share of the Kurds, although this is not enshrined in law or the constitution.

This is only according to political agreements and was desired by Iran. But the KDP will no longer be prepared to support the PUK taking this position as well as that of Kirkuk governor. 

That is why Barham Salih declined to accept the position of the president of the republic when the Talabani family offered it to him, because Salih knew that it was no longer in their power to give the position to him. 

This time, the Arab world and Turkey want this position to be filled by a Sunni Arab in order to change the appearance of Iraq from Shiite and influenced by Iran to an Arabic identity. 

This way, they want to further strengthen their relations with Baghdad and dedicate more resources to the reconstruction of ruined Sunni places. That is why many Sunni Arabs want this position to be held by them. 

The Kurds have not benefited much from this position or their other honorary powers. That is why it is a big mistake to insist that this position is the share of the Kurds. 

Instead, taking the position of parliament speaker is the best option for Kurds. There, they can influence events in Baghdad. Having the position of the speaker of the Iraqi parliament, which works on the basis of majority vis-à-vis minority, is important so that the legislative body doesn’t turn into a place where conspiracies are made against the Kurdistan Region. 

Over the past four years, tens of laws were passed against the Kurds to punish and deter the people of Kurdistan. Having the speaker role will strengthen the position of the Kurds for any future negotiation on their fate in Iraq and will cement the influence of Erbil over decisions made in Baghdad. 

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


Comments

 
our american allieeeezzzzz | 12/4/2018
kind sir, no matter how kurds vote or for who, if you are not with iranians you have to stand aside and watch while hezbollah rules the country. simple as that not buts and ifs and whats about it. maybe our american allieeeeeezzzzzz can pull out something out of the magic hat. until than we have to turn to mecca and pray to mojo for guidence and companionship.
duroi | 13/4/2018
Because president Ma'sum did not exercise all his powers, it does not mean that the presidency has no power. Besides if a Sunni Arab takes the presidency and the prime minister dies or is killed, the president will take over the duties of the prime minister and Iraq could slide back to the Saddam era. One single bullet or a bomb to Saddam era is too risky for majority in Iraq.
Rebwar | 14/4/2018
In the past (post-Saddam; 2003-2005) the Kurds were strong because they had united their line; therefore, gained constitutional recognition and exactly stated what they want (articles 57, 111, 112, 115, and 140). However, the current situation is different because political parties are divided and only care for personal gains and posts rather than the constitutional rights of the KRG. Eventually lost their strength. The enemies of our nation united, I hope that threat waken up and unites the Kurdish parties to meet the coming challenges.
Azad Azadi | 16/4/2018
This article is waste of time for Rudaw to publish it. It is Waste of time for readers. This article sounds like teashop discussion. No points for discussion, no analysis. The writer is naive to think Iraqi Arabs will give meaningful post to Kurds. The presidency position is ceremonial and symbolic. I am surprised Rudaw lowered its standard by publishing this meaningless article.
1809 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

FAUthman | 11/25/2018 5:41:14 PM
US will not just pack up and leave after ISIS final defeat and let chaos ensue with Turks, Persians and everyone else rushing in to take over. As...
Freddy | 12/13/2018 3:37:56 AM
The US can not abandon the North eastern Kurds to a 2 front war w Turkey in the North and SAA to the south.I think some kind of deal w Damuscus is...
To fight ISIS the US has to placate Turkey and protect Syria's Kurds
| 23/11/2018 | (6)
tim | 12/12/2018 8:38:13 PM
erdoganTurkey - is all what the world don´t needs.: radical islamists, fascists, jihadis, hamas friends, muslim brotherhood,supporter of almost all...
guest2002 | 12/13/2018 3:24:42 AM
Turks are jihadi savages. They want to kill all Kurds in anyway possible. Is anyone surprised??? But this time things are different. Those Turkish...
Turkey sends tanks, howitzers to Syrian border: report
| yesterday at 07:26 | (12)
traitors | 11/17/2018 12:53:43 AM
Who the fuck gives a shit about Khashoggi execution I can’t believe that this moron didn’t recognize he was missused by the Turks and now being...
SickOfTheSameRant | 12/13/2018 12:03:25 AM
Ahh the ISIS rant again.. A group that is actually left in limbo for that it provides excuses for anyone involved. YPG had the chance to break up...
Balancing Kurdish, Turkish allies ‘comes at a cost on battlefield’: Jeffrey
| 16/11/2018 | (7)
guest | 12/12/2018 10:12:18 PM
Imagine being a sunni and nominating a shia after all the death and suffering that shias inflicted on the sunni population. These are not "sunnis"...
Sunni rift over Ministry of Defence widens
| yesterday at 11:45 | (1)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

0.297 seconds