Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Mosul and the Failure of American Policy Towards Iraq

By DAVID ROMANO 12/6/2014

On the night of June 9th, jihadis of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) overran Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city. Other majority Sunni-Arab parts of Iraq such as Ramadi and Faluja have fallen in and out of Baghdad’s control since last year, of course, but Mosul represents a watershed moment in the crisis. Decision makers in Washington will probably conclude from these events that the government in Baghdad is too weak. They will agree with Prime Minister Maliki that he needs “emergency powers” to deal with the crisis.

As usual with American policy on Iraq these past several years, this will only make the problem worse. For years, Washington promoted a “united Iraq” and stronger central government over all other considerations. While occasionally paying lip-service to the need for Prime Minister Maliki to “share power more,” the Americans effectively gave Mr. Maliki carte blanche to do as he likes. They delivered huge sums of money, weapons, training and other aid to Baghdad, including this month’s delivery of the first of thirty-six F-16 fighter planes. While American diplomats appeared resolute in siding with the Maliki government in its disputes with the Kurds and others wanting more decentralization of power, they showed no such commitment to Iraq’s constitution and the clear limits it places on Baghdad’s authority.

When during the past several years Maliki blocked the legal formation of more regions in Iraq, even going so far as to send his security forces to arrest Sunni Arab politicians trying to exercise their constitutional rights on the matter, the United States had nothing to say. When Baghdad failed to incorporate Sunni Awakening Councils into the armed forces or allow Sunni Arab regions to look after their own security (something which is also constitutionally permitted), no more than a few murmurs of concern were heard from Washington. When Baghdad cut off the Iraqi Kurds’ share of the budget, spokespersons in Washington remained mum.

Now the Americans are shocked, and asking themselves how some rag-tag ISIS Jihadis, outgunned and outnumbered by Iraqi military forces in Mosul by around 15 to 1, managed to overrun the city. “We gave them so many weapons, training and money,” they exclaim, “and now they won’t even step up to the plate.” Policy makers in Washington should also ask themselves how the Iraqi Kurds, who received next to nothing in military or financial assistance, manage to hold out against the Jihadis and keep their region secure.

The answer, I think, has to do with governance. Kurdish fighters feel that their regional government represents them and are willing to fight for it and their land. In contrast, Shiite Iraqi Army recruits do not know Sunni areas like Mosul and do not want to be there, much less die there. Sunni soldiers, meanwhile, do not feel that the government they serve is theirs. They have seen their communities shut out by Maliki and his disconnected politicians in Baghdad. The Sunni Arabs faced serious persecution in the last couple of years, seeing their peaceful protests violently put down by Maliki and their elected leaders sidelined and hunted down one by one.

Allowing constitutionally-envisioned decentralization of power and the formation of other regions could have stopped this and put locals in charge of their own security and finances. This never happened except for in Iraqi Kurdistan, and even there local governance has come under threat by Maliki’s pressure (although Washington could not care less, of course). In the rest of Iraq, promised money and governing authority from Baghdad hardly filters down to the regions, and security forces take all their orders from far-away politicians of the central government.

Given how badly the Americans continue to misread Iraq, whoever in Washington has been making U.S. policy there should be transferred to the Fiji, Mauritius or similarly important desks as quickly as possible. The real threat in Iraq was never Kurdish secession, but rather renewed authoritarianism in Baghdad and the resistance this would spark in excluded communities. Instead of being so overbearingly “respectful of Iraq’s territorial unity,” the Americans should have been a bit more concerned with Iraq’s constitutional integrity and the decentralization it promised.

In the meantime, the Kurdistan Regional Government will continue to secure its region and help refugees from Mosul and other places. If the Kurds are wise, they will also refuse to lift a finger for the Americans and Baghdad unless their demands are met. These demands will probably relate to ending the budget embargo on the Kurdish region, financial aid to care for the refugees, payments and weapons for peshmerga forces, recognition of Kurdistan’s hydrocarbons rights and a new government without Mr. Maliki. While the Americans and Baghdad mull over these demands, they might also consider promises regarding disputed territories they both made to the Kurds some ten years ago – before the Kurds use current events to take matters into their own hands.

David Romano has been a Rudaw columnist since 2010. He is the Thomas G. Strong Professor of Middle East Politics at Missouri State University and author of The Kurdish Nationalist Movement (2006, Cambridge University Press) and co-editor (with Mehmet Gurses) of the forthcoming Conflict, Democratization and the Kurds in the Middle East (2014, Palgrave Macmillan).


Data pager
Page size:
KIM | 12/6/2014
Obamas FP is a catastrophe. Iraq is heading toward partition. Support our Peshmarga Forces to the fullest extent possible. We should not withdraw from Kirkuk and all disputed Kurdish areas any more. We must hold a quick referendum to annex them back to South constitutionally. 80% of KIrkuk belongs to us. Turkmen, Kurds and Christians can coexist in an independent Kurdistan peacefully. Next is declaration of independence, install a full democratic state, and peace with all nations and states in the world, including Israel.
Michael | 12/6/2014
Possession is nine tenths of the law as the saying goes. Now is the time for the KRG to make the move to secure the Kurdish areas and then negotiate from a position of power. Given the way things are, even non-Kurds in those areas might not be unhappy about someone taking charge who can actually govern and maintain security.
FAUthman | 12/6/2014
Withdrawal by the Kurdish forces from the Kurdish areas will not happen. Read the statement of today by Jabar Yawar of the Ministry of Peshmerga. It is a great and wise statement. He is almost telling us where the new border for the KRG will be set up. The Kurds have already taken matters in their own hands without seeming uncooperative. They have welcomed all civilians and Iraqi military to safety in Kurdistan including helping some high ranking Iraqi military escape to Kurdistan and be tranferred to Baghdad through Arbil.
Las | 12/6/2014
Dr. Romano what do you expect when the foremost 'experts' on Iraq and Kurds in Washington are the likes of Denise Natali rather than people who actually know what they're talking about. Kurdish experts went to great length to explain to the Americans that only a federal de-centralized structure in Iraq had a chance of any success, if that's what they were interested in. Kurds thought that they had made the Americans and other Iraqis convinced what was the best path forward was and if you remember worked very hard the first years to secure a constitution which was fair, federal and most importantly realistic. It's now clear that the constitution was just a trap to get the Kurds help Iraq back on it's feet with a strong central government contrary to everything agreed upon, and of course it lead to the disaster Kurds warned of, if the Americans and Iraqis themselves are not interested in a functioning Iraqi state why should Kurds bother?
Benson | 12/6/2014
The idiot KIM wrote: "Obamas FP is a catastrophe." Yes, we need to immediately get Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc...back into office. Since they are the true experts on managing Iraq.
Tags :

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

FAUthman | 1/14/2018 5:30:34 PM
The US has revealed a new Syria policy. Very significant, Trump has shifted from the Obama cautious policy, to a new very bold policy, and will...
Brian Ghilliotti | 1/16/2018 10:10:53 AM
Does Turkey believe it can carry out another Srebrenica with Afrin? I think it may be a much more painful experience for the besiegers. Who knows? It...
Erdogan threatens military operation in Afrin within a week
| 13/1/2018 | (7)
kurt basar | 1/15/2018 7:55:49 PM
Unfortunately the naive & proud Kurd's love to serve their Turkish, Arab & Iranian masters but not Kurdish one, because of that they couldn't create...
Richard | 1/16/2018 8:53:36 AM
The airports have always been under ICAA jurisdiction so I don't see why they needed 4 months of a ban and 2 meetings to come to that agreement!!
Baghdad, Erbil agree to lift flight ban, pending PM Abadi's approval
| yesterday at 06:57 | (8)
Non kurd | 1/16/2018 7:24:57 AM
This seemed to be avoidable. I'm surprised they didn't Abandon Ship and board the nearby rescue ships.
Iran oil tanker explodes, sinks off China with no survivors
| yesterday at 02:52 | (1)
Azad | 1/16/2018 4:00:03 AM
And finally KRG took off the last piece of clothes they are wearing . Now we can go back to work and live normally . Thank you for a great adventure...
Saman | 1/16/2018 4:10:41 AM
Muraz . Hot much does the kdp pay you so you can write garbage all day . Everything you say is useless and a lie . I suggest you go read some history...
Oil-for-budget proposal agreed on in Erbil-Baghdad talks
| yesterday at 11:59 | (5)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Deloitte found no ‘misstatements’ in KRG oil sales in first audit report 5 hours ago |

Deloitte found no ‘misstatements’ in KRG oil sales in first audit report

KRG earned more than $3 billion from oil sales in more
Kurdistan Islamic Union withdraws from KRG coalition government 6 hours ago |

Kurdistan Islamic Union withdraws from KRG coalition government

KDP and PUK still enjoy the majority n the more
European Parliament expresses solidarity for dismissed Kurdish MP in Turkey 6 hours ago |

European Parliament expresses solidarity for dismissed Kurdish MP in Turkey

It's not acceptable that 'someone elected by the more
0.391 seconds