Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

ISIS Removed Sykes-Picot Borders, Why Shouldn’t the Kurds?

By Yerevan Saeed 15/6/2014
opinion
opinion

Kurdish Peshmerga forces are in full control of what they call Kurdistani areas outside the Kurdistan Region. This provides a golden opportunity for them to once and for all to settle their land dispute with Iraq.

The Kurds hoped to regain those lands through the constitutional Article 140, but ten years passed and Baghdad showed no genuine intention to implement that article or settle that issue that means so much to the Kurds.

Now and with Peshmerga forces deployed across Kirkuk province and parts of Nineveh and Diyala, KRG officials have to act wisely. Coordinate with the local tribes, establish contact and effective communications and give assurance and a sense of belonging to some minorities who live in those areas and might be apprehensive of Kurdish control.

The current situation in Iraq is very similar to that of 2003, in term of the total collapse of the Iraqi army and the Kurdish takeover of exactly the same areas they took last week. However back then, they had to withdraw under US and Turkish pressure.

This time, Ankara and Erbil are on good terms. They have strong economic and diplomatic ties as well as longstanding energy agreements. Also unlike 2003, this time there are no US troops in Iraq to replace the Peshmerga in Kirkuk and fill the security vacuum left behind the Iraqi army.

Besides, the Kurds won Kirkuk in a landslide victory in Iraq’s provincial elections in April.

Kurds helped rebuild Iraq after Saddam Hussein, hoping that the new “democratic, pluralistic federal Iraq” would yield to their legitimate demands and respects them as equal partners. But the outcome was the same cycle of procrastination, denial of Kurdish rights and a centralized Iraq that was much too dependent on the iron fist of the army, which collapsed before our eyes in the matter of hours.

The Kurds patiently tested all kinds of regimes in Iraq—monarchy, socialism, nationalism, Baathism and finally the so-called post-Saddam democracy, but the story was always the same.

Unlike an unstable, unreliable Iraq, Turkey could be a more secure partner and gateway to the outside world, not only for the Kurdish oil, but also for Kirkuk that is believed to have 9 billion barrels of oil reserves. The Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline can be rerouted to Kurdistan, something that can be done under the 2013 energy agreement.

For this, its imperative that Ankara supports the KRG to remain a powerful force in Iraq and Kirkuk in particular. The 50-year energy agreement can be redrafted and include Kirkuk, too.

In the meantime, the KRG can give security and all the citizenship rights to the Turkmen, Assyrian, Arabs, Chaldeans and Yazidis and involve them in local and political affairs of the new areas. In turn, they will stand by the KRG and its bid for an easy control and possible independence.

Finally when the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) declares the end of the 1916 Sykes-Picot borders, why shouldn’t the Kurds be able to do the same?

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
joris diepstraten | 15/6/2014
good luck in creating a justicestate worth mentioning in the history books
Marco Pollo | 15/6/2014
This is not a smart question. Why? because the Kurds are not ISIS! but a nation that deserve a state, yes they do. Should they declare it regardless of Iraqi/US will, sure they should. Should we compare them to ISIS, definitely dumb to do so.
Lies | 15/6/2014
The KDP just forcibly removed the minority mayor of Alqosh which was chosen by the inhabitants and replaced him with a KDP man. Same thing happend in Ezidi villages. KRG is not much different from Al Malikis Iraq. Both want to rule areas that are not theirs.
noon | 15/6/2014
What does this have to do with the Sykes-Picot borders? The KRG/Iraq border, which is the only one that the recapture of Kirkuk would change, was not drawn as part of the Sykes-Picot agreement. Ending the Sykes-Picot borders for Kurdistan would mean incorporating territory from Syria, which is still a ways from happening.
FAUthman | 15/6/2014
Why do you need to "declare" anything, just change realities on the ground!
Tags :
8891 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Muraz Adzhoev | 11/21/2017 11:02:49 AM
It is clear that they want to restore unity and integrity of the Iraqi (pro-Iranian) arab federation in order to “preserve” (autonomous) sovereignty...
duroi | 11/22/2017 5:25:35 AM
There is really no point in shuffling the cabinet which will last few months, a new minister needs several months to get settled and this also...
Gorran in meeting with KRG reiterates dissolution of government
| yesterday at 12:45 | (2)
duroi | 11/22/2017 4:59:58 AM
UNAMI needs to stick to its time limited "advisory and assisting" mandate and advise Iraq to withdraw from disputed areas its Iran backed militias...
Enkiu | 11/22/2017 5:08:59 AM
UN is an irrelevant and corrupt organization. UN ignores crimes or is ineffective in preventing them. UN takes no account of the quality of the court...
UN says referendum issue is resolved, urges KRG to accept court ruling
| 16 hours ago | (10)
Outsider | 11/22/2017 12:24:07 AM
In the medium term, there are only 3 options: (a) accept the demands of Baghdad, (b) cooperate with Iran or (c) cooperate with Turkey. You are...
GUEST2002 | 11/22/2017 2:14:04 AM
what does that even mean?? why not fight the invaders instead?? why just give and give and give?? you gave the shiia jihadis 50 percent of your land...
PM Barzani: We agreed to Iraqi army territorial demands, but within limits
| 19 hours ago | (5)
FAUthman | 11/21/2017 4:26:36 PM
Abadi's statements on the referendum were more reasonable than the those of the federal court: the referendum, Abadi said was no more than a public...
K | 11/21/2017 9:44:00 PM
Kurds ca never be independent by being a pussy. You should have fought to death for a few weeks and the world opinion about how serious Kurds are,...
Masoud Barzani: No court can cancel 3 million votes for independence
| yesterday at 09:38 | (16)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Health of PUK's Kosrat Rasul 'excellent' 16 hours ago | (1)

Health of PUK's Kosrat Rasul 'excellent'

Kosrat Rasul will leave Germany to Kurdistan once more
PM Barzani: We agreed to Iraqi army territorial demands, but within limits 19 hours ago | (5)

PM Barzani: We agreed to Iraqi army territorial demands, but within limits

He says Peshmerga did not withdraw from Kirkuk more
0.203 seconds