Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

The state of Kurdistan and fates of minorities

By Bakhtyar Karim 20/4/2017
-
-

 

How can we be free without violating freedoms of others? This is an important question which every Kurd should ask themselves. It is an intrinsic question to any cause of statehood as a philosophical concept. 


The history of building a state goes parallel to the history in legitimizing the practice of inclusion or exclusion of different social components in the state apparatus. A state shouldn’t comprise framework within which power is monopolized solely by a legal establishment. 

Rather, it is a framework within which distinctions are made between citizens and noncitizens, us and others. Some kind of nationalism is inherent in every state. And nationalism dictates the principles of inclusion and marginalization, which differ according to the type of nationalism at play. 

Ethnic nationalism marginalizes those outside the ruling ethnicity in some way or form. The Kurds have been the greatest victims of this kind of nationalism since the beginning of the 20th century. 

However, civic nationalism strives to broaden the framework of inclusion and narrow that of marginalization. Kurdish politicians and intellectuals pride themselves on the existence of an unparalleled coexistence of different social and religious components in the Kurdistan Region. This, to a large extent, is the case. 

It is this coexistence that accounts for some minorities showing support for independence for the Kurdistan Region, though doing so cautiously. But this kind of peaceful coexistence in the region is not only attributable to the kindness of the Kurdish leadership.

The real reason behind this, is that many of these different components are apolitical. And they themselves, in their own ghettos, have marginalized themselves. This kind of self-marginalization or distancing from broader political and greater social life is ascribable to a historical fear of the Kurdish and Muslim majority in the region. 

The participation of these different social and religious components in the region’s political process has been conditioned to some prerequisites set by the Kurdish leadership. However, this participation hasn’t yet been fixed within a strategic framework. 

The participation of minorities in the political process is different from creating equal opportunities for such participation. The notion of ‘participation’ involves some kind of ‘giving’ from a linguistic perspective. 

It appears there is consensus among politicians and intellectuals in the Kurdistan Region to delay the question of equal rights of citizenship for minorities and protecting their distinct identity, until after a state is built. 

Deferring this, and other important questions until after a state is built, is a big problem. Doing so implies that current mentality is that of delaying these matters, and hasn’t been able to demarcate between its intellectual parameters and those of its past oppressors. It is also a reference that the Kurdistan state enterprise based on this mentality will lead to the constitution of a state that deepens ethnic and religious nationalism. 

Kurdish nationalism could be employed differently in this regard. The history of coexistence in the Kurdistan Region might be used as evidence for a tolerant Kurdish nationalism in the region. However, its history in governance places its nationalism in a difficult position, between being unlimitedly tolerant and completely closed in its definition of citizenship. 

In their endeavors to build a state, all Kurdish political parties in the Kurdistan Region are trying to replace the very monster they are fighting against (with something similar), instead of attempting to build something different to what they have been suffering from. 

Kurdish nationalism has, since its emergence, been under the influence of the experience and nationalism of the countries which have split the Kurdish territory. The survival of state as an end justifies all kinds of means for Turks, Persians and Arabs. Similarly, the Kurds are doing everything they can to build a state of this character. 

The Kurds’ legendary love affair and endeavors for statehood should benefit from Friedrich Nietzsche’s advice that people fighting a monster shouldn’t themselves become monsters in the end. 

Thus, the task of the Kurds shouldn’t only be the building of a state. Rather, it should aim at constituting a state that is different from the ones which the Kurds have fought against. The model of state which the Kurds are striving to build shouldn’t be like the monster models which committed genocide against the Kurds. It shouldn’t be a state that perpetrates genocide against its minorities. 

Last year, Rand Corporation, an American policy think tank, issued a report on the implications of building a Kurdistan state. One of the important areas which the report touches upon is the question of minorities fearing to live in a Kurdish state, but not having problems living within the framework of a state whose majority is determined by agreement as Kurdish. This subject should be of importance to us. 

The majority of population in the Kurdistan Region is Kurds and the majority of these Kurds is Muslim. But being a Kurd and a Muslim shouldn’t be the basis of citizenship, nor should they be used as a means by the majority to monopolize power. 

In civil states, citizenship is a legal concept and has no relation to identity. The establishment in these societies creates equal opportunities for political involvement. Therefore, every citizen is entitled to participate in the political process irrespective of identity. 

The Iraqi model is of use for the Kurds. They should neither run away from it, nor should they build an exact replica of it. The Kurds should strive to build a state that doesn’t impose identity, language or a particular religion on other components. 

The model of a future Kurdish state should be such that incorporates all the components of the region without any ethnic or religious constraints. Hence, it is vital that the minorities of the Kurdistan Region are involved in discussions on the future of the region. 

 

Bakhtyar Karim is an instructor in the University of Salahaddin's philosophy department in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


 

Comments

 
Eugene | 20/4/2017
What is the solution?...a...for unity-sake(for the sake of unity) everyone would have to be a member of South Kurdistan...as a priority.Secondly...could they could have duel citizenship cards(or 2 cards)coins ..one side..kurdistan,one-side minority, bills one side kurdistan,one side minority,flags...kurdistan flag,then minority flag,military..serve two years kurdistan,then 2 yrs. minority military..language learn kurdish & their own language at young age..this would have to be worked out with the KRG...
Method Man | 20/4/2017
What the hell is this author yapping about? the minorities in Kurdistan have every cultural linguistic and religous rights there is! I dare him to mention any other country in the Middle East and beyond that can match Kurdistan region in this regard. As for political rights the minorities in Kurdistan are allocated parliament seats way beyond their population nr.! they've also been given minstral and department posts in every KRG government since 1992! Why the HELl are you taking something postive and turning it into a problem? The only thing you got right is despite unprecedented rights most of the minorities isolate themselves and some are even skeptical towards Kurdish indipendence e.g. the turkmen of Kirkuk
brilliant idea | 21/4/2017
KURDS ARE A MINORITY IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY EVEN BEFORE DECLARING INDEPENDENCE YOU BRILLIANT EINSTIEN YOU.
A Kurd in exile | 21/4/2017
In principle, I agree with the author. As long as a person residing in Kurdistan (regardless of his/her race, religion, language, etc.) considers himself/herself a citizen of Kurdistan and pledges allegiance to the Kurdish State, he/she should have equal rights with everybody else and enjoy every opportunity that everybody else enjoys. Period! And those rights and equal opportunities should be guaranteed in the Nation's Constitution (like the U.S. Bill of Rights). This is the only way that will guarantee having a peaceful and prosperous nation that we the Kurds deserve. We are not Turks, nor Arabs nor Persians! We are the Kurds. We are Noble. We cannot and should not treat the minorities in our country in the same way that the Turks, the Arabs, or the Persians treat minorities their countries. We are better than them!
2225 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

D Kurd | 8/17/2017 11:50:53 AM
The referendum is the total right of the Kurdish people and others, we will not postpone and no one should scare us with their fake and shallow...
BijiKurdOKurdistan | 8/17/2017 11:52:11 AM
If, i say if this happen. Sorry, but are the leaders ready to lie to all the kurds? We said 25 september. And we know that the iraqis will probably...
UPDATED: Erbil prepared to postpone referendum if Baghdad agrees to a date, source
| 20 hours ago | (4)
Besnili Haco | 8/17/2017 11:22:39 AM
The Regime of Iran also is not legal..!
dave J | 8/17/2017 11:33:05 AM
Iran is illegal state that was build on Kurdish land, Baluches, Ahwazi, Gilani lands, they are number one supporter of extremism, thewy should be...
UN official denies Iranian report he called Kurdistan’s referendum ‘not legal’
| 21 hours ago | (2)
The Observer | 8/16/2017 7:54:34 PM
As the Iraqi government softens its position towards the Kurdish independence Iran and Turkey are hardening their opposition .Neither, however,...
C G Cattermole | 8/17/2017 9:51:30 AM
Why is anyone bothering to talk to Maliki, who has proven himself a committed opponent of the Kurds? "We hope — if needs arise, to have a process...
VP Maliki: Iraqi constitution may need to be amended to allow Kurdish referendum
| yesterday at 06:28 | (11)
Hoshyar Zaxoy | 8/17/2017 9:48:11 AM
I know they did that with Saddam in the 80s
Damascus claims US, UK and Turkey provide 'toxic' weapons to groups in Syria
| yesterday at 11:15 | (1)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Observations in Kurdistan: Mutual respect promotes progress 11 hours ago |

Observations in Kurdistan: Mutual respect promotes progress

Where is the middle class? more
US responds to Iran’s threats to pull out of nuclear deal 18 hours ago |

US responds to Iran’s threats to pull out of nuclear deal

"we must also continue to hold Iran responsible more
Iraqi court rules to take down Kurdistan flag over state buildings in Kirkuk 19 hours ago |

Iraqi court rules to take down Kurdistan flag over state buildings in Kirkuk

Kurdish officials say they will appeal the ruling more
0.266 seconds