Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





KDP’s misplaced fear of the Gorran-PUK agreement

By Arif Qurbany

The reaction of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) in its media outlets and the words of its political figures to the agreement between the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and Change Movement (Gorran) was least expected.

The KDP was extremely anxious about this agreement when in fact the PUK and Gorran have had another agreement between them for more than a year over government posts in Sulaimani, Halabja and the Garmiyan region.

During last year’s events in the parliament and the proposal for changing the presidential system the PUK and Gorran did indeed take up the same stance and acted as one faction.

The closeness between the PUK and Gorran and their almost united view of the KDP is nothing new. So why is the KDP so unsettled by their agreement of May 17?

In the last four years and especially after Gorran’s participation in the eighth cabinet of government other parties have had the same concerns. KDP’s own closeness to any party was always a cause for concern for another.

If anything, this agreement between the PUK and Gorran means it would be easier for the KDP from now on to deal with the green zone (local Kurdish term for PUK areas of influence). If, as it is reported, the PUK and Gorran are going to have one center of decision, then it would be as good for the KDP as it might be for the two new allies themselves because since Jalal Talabani’s illness a few years ago this province did not have a center of decision.

Even though Gorran was the winner of the last elections in its areas, it was unable and not in a position to speak for or act on behalf of the entire green zone. Similarly the PUK, due to its internal problems, could no longer make any decisions for itself let alone representing the entire province. And the intense dispute between the PUK and Gorran had on the other hand left Sulaimani on the margins and deprived it of one decision-making center. Those facts were also the reason there was some political distance between Erbil and Sulaimani, even though we are not sure yet if these two cities will now come closer or drift further apart.

All of this is happening at a time that the world, research centers and western media are talking about geographic changes in the Middle East and the possibility of Kurds emerging as a new state.

Domestically, President Barzani is continuously stressing the need for holding a referendum and people in Kirkuk and Kurdish areas outside the Kurdistan Region want reassurance that they are included in this process.

Therefore, it is only right to ask what KDP’s fears are based on. Are they based on its own disputes with Gorran or does it fear renewed polarization of Kurdistan? Why should the KDP be anxious even if Gorran and PUK unite not only politically but even in parliament?

We have fallen on and overcome much harder days in the past. An agreement between Talabani and Barzani ended our civil war. So why should the KDP not be able to deal with the PUK and Gorran as one party, especially if they can represent and speak for the green zone? This, in light of the fact that there are many security, economic and political agreements between both sides.

The days ahead require us to put our house in order and if we are seeking statehood we need to put all differences aside.

I wouldn’t be wrong to say KDP’s fear of this PUK-Gorran agreement is irrational or most likely just an illusion the KDP has created for itself. The KDP leadership must allay this fear and be ready to instead deal realistically with what this agreement may bring.

This stage calls for brave decisions and Barzani must devote his efforts to unlocking the political stalemate and strengthen the independence quest he is leading.

*This article was translated from Kurdish.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


Data pager
Page size:
AB | 25/5/2016
This Qurbany guy was on Saddams payroll, I'm all for free speech but you should do a better job of screening who can write for your site.
guest worker | 25/5/2016
What I'm about to say of course goes for PUK and Gorran but since we're talking about KDP here I would respectfully like to ask them (again) why their leadership is always willing to sit down with any Arab from Baghdad but snub other Kurdish leaders and parties? We're talking about the same people from Baghdad who have caused us and our economy tremendous damage on a regular basis. Have we forgotten that Baghdad's policies created ISIL which became a real existential threat to us? did we forget while we were literally being swallowed up by ISIL they blocked us from even getting arms to defend ourselves? what if the US had not intervened? would the KDP leadership be residing in Erbil today? did you forget about that?. Let's not even talk about how they've cut our budget and caused so much suffering and trouble for more than 7 million people living currently in South Kurdistan. If they can kiss the cheeks of these Arabs every other week as if nothing has happened and keep going back to the negotiating table to "work it out" with them why can't they do the same with Gorran or PUK?. Even if you fault Gorran or PUK and exaggerate their faults by a factor of a hundred they've still not come close to doing as much damage to KDP as Baghdad, so why so soft on your enemy and so brave for your own? shouldn't it be the exact opposite?
K | 25/5/2016
Some credible thoughts are there and plausible. Whatever it is, this sulaimani Hawler and north and south divides won't help Kurdistan and it is detrimental to the call for independence and for that just the party leaders have to be blamed. The President of Kurdistan is saying that the time is ripe for a Kurdish state, but if they cant't get their houses in order, you have to forget independence and have to pray for the nation not to break down further.
splay | 25/5/2016
@AB. Why are you trying to bleed old wounds when they're finally about to heal? many people (including some party leaders) were on "Saddam's" payroll at one point or another. many people (including some party leaders) did worse and invited saddam's army. Even if he was the worst traitor in the past it doesn't make the points he's making here less valid. And try to remember a few things 1. We were not at war with saddam the entire 4 decades he ruled 2. Saddam controlled all of Iraq's money as if it was his own. and 3. what's important is that people who made horrible mistakes recognize their mistakes and never repeat them.
amjad kalari | 26/5/2016
It's about time the Kurdistan parties and their leaders stop squabbling with their petty and egotistic behavior. Kurdistan national interest and security must be the priority. The predatory enemies are trying to create discord among the Kurdish political entities to serve their colonialist schemes in order to destroy the Kurdish liberation movement. Time to wake up.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Leon | 3/24/2019 8:03:06 AM
Sistani is not the governemnt, so get fucked. Iraq should use force to remove him.
Iraqi PM proposes parliament sacks Nineveh governor
| yesterday at 11:47 | (1)
Adam | 3/23/2019 2:49:50 PM
I wander what the Saudi royal family would say.
Gunrash | 3/24/2019 3:10:11 AM
Golan is Israeli just like Kirkuk, Amed, Mehabad and Afrin are Kurdish! Enough with the hypocrisy and selective indignation. UN is a joke.
Trump’s Golan statement draws strong regional condemnation
| yesterday at 08:49 | (4)
Adam | 3/23/2019 2:40:05 PM
Now the west especially America have the duty to reward the Kurds with real protection.
Kurde Canada | 3/24/2019 1:41:08 AM
God is no more with ISIS. They were just being used by him. They were betrayed.
SDF declare ‘total elimination’ of ISIS caliphate
| yesterday at 09:32 | (4)
TerraNova | 3/23/2019 10:02:06 PM
And now you show the world that The United States of America stands by it's allies and dose NOT abandon an ally that sacrificed thousands of brave...
Dutchman | 3/23/2019 11:18:00 PM
Trump is right when he sais that the US together with it's allies defeated ISIS. And it is also good that he wants to continue to work with his...
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’
| 16 hours ago | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Mosul mourns victims of the ferry disaster 4 hours ago |

Mosul mourns victims of the ferry disaster

Grieving Mosul is not celebrating victory over more
Iraqi fishermen flounder on the Shatt al-Arab 15 hours ago |

Iraqi fishermen flounder on the Shatt al-Arab

Iran and Kuwait prevent them from fishing further more
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’ 16 hours ago | (3)

Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’

"We will remain vigilant" more
0.407 seconds