Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

Arming Gorran? A blow to democracy

By 26/6/2018
Flags of Iraq, the Kurdistan Region, and Gorran fly near the Change Movement's headquarters in Sulaimani. Photo: Rudaw TV
Flags of Iraq, the Kurdistan Region, and Gorran fly near the Change Movement's headquarters in Sulaimani. Photo: Rudaw TV
by Abdullah Reshawi

After fraud allegations of May 12 election and after the Change Movement left the government on October 12, the idea to arm the movement emerged inside and outside the party organs. But, is this a good idea or an emotional and ill-thought reaction?


Arming Gorran or any other unarmed parties in the Kurdistan Region, including the KDP and PUK is unwise. Moreover, we should think about ways to force these two parties to lay down their weapons. Moreover, the idea of arming other parties gives legitimacy to the armed status of the KDP and PUK.

Gorran and other political parties instead should pursue legal, constitutional, and parliamentary measures to force the KDP and PUK to lay down their guns. The electoral body should make it conditional that only unarmed parties are eligible to participate in elections.

The flaw of arming Gorran is that it reduces the concept of ‘force’ to ‘guns’ — force can be achieved without guns.

Developing thousands of dedicated and volunteering democratic cadres is one way to give power to any political party. This area, Gorran and other parties should explore, but history shows in many cases civilians overpower and prevail over armed forces. In modern history, armed revolutionaries were eventually forced to lay down their weapons in order to continue.

Another drawback of the idea of armament is that the purpose of a political party fundamentally changes. If a civilian party aims to enforce democratic and civilian principles in the country, by arming itself, the party would then be concerned solely with working to protect and maintain itself.

For example, a party like Gorran should make compromises to enforce real democratic principles, rather than working to maintain the party as an objective. Perhaps Gorran could protect itself if it is armed, but this would be at the expense of the democratic principles they have espoused.

We should ask why Gorran was expelled from the government. It wasn’t only because they didn’t back down on their demands to the dominant party. The reason why there wasn’t civil war when Gorran was uncompromising was because it wasn’t armed.

Gorran was adamant in its position and didn’t compromise on the Kurdistan Region’s presidential law because the party was not armed. If Gorran was armed at the time, reaching an agreement or waging an internal war would have been the party’s only choices, just like the PUK, which has strategic agreements with the KDP because both parties are armed.

Those who uphold the idea of arming unarmed parties in order to protect democratic principles argue that by being armed, these parties can prevent voting fraud, injustices, and ensure protestors are not beaten when they take to the streets.

This is easier said than done and difficult. In reality it ends purely civilian endeavors, will lead to internal war, and restricts space for civilian endeavors. Becoming an armed party would only allow Gorran’s opposition to criticize the very values it was founded upon and has democratically struggled against.


The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.
2379 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

PrivateEye | 9/21/2018 2:46:17 PM
Coward chicken
Guest | 9/21/2018 6:32:25 PM
The people of Kurdistan better gather this man into their arms and hold on tight.
Najmaldin Karim says he's not with PUK or KDP
| yesterday at 07:19 | (11)
Ahmed27 | 9/21/2018 4:37:55 PM
The 2017 referendum will take the Kurds to independence for sure. And that day all the traitors will cry! Bji Barzani
Guest | 9/21/2018 6:24:57 PM
I know this article doesn't reflect the views of all people in Kurdistan, but I resent what the writer said in the last part of this article where he...
September 25: The unforgettable day Kurds voted to leave Iraq
| 9 hours ago | (6)
thurgood bardico | 9/21/2018 5:58:23 PM
"Moderate opposition"... LOL
Turkey, Russia agree on Idlib demilitarized zone borders
| 7 hours ago | (1)
Zanyarkermashani | 9/21/2018 1:07:49 PM
When you kill soldiers border guards, dont complain. Even Saddam used you ad puppets against Iran.
Victoria Kermashani | 9/21/2018 5:27:27 PM
Shame on you Zanyarkermashani! Nobody is killig the soldiers on the borders, but the peshmerga forces have to d fend themselves when they are...
Scarred for life, Kurds from Iran plead for UN intervention after Koya attack
| 14 hours ago | (2)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

PUK list head Talabani says not to retaliate after election posters slashed 9 hours ago | (1)

PUK list head Talabani says not to retaliate after election posters slashed

“I call on members and supporters of all parties more
September 25: The unforgettable day Kurds voted to leave Iraq 9 hours ago | (6)

September 25: The unforgettable day Kurds voted to leave Iraq

They traded the Kurds and the votes of millions more
Northern Syria officials overwhelmed by detained ISIS fighters request int’l help 11 hours ago | (3)

Northern Syria officials overwhelmed by detained ISIS fighters request int’l help

"Now every country has moral, human and legal more
0.375 seconds