Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Kurdistan Should Welcome Debate about Referendum

By DAVID ROMANO 27/7/2017
This week the owner of the Nalia Radio and Television corporation (NRT) in Sulaimani, Shaswar Abdulwahid Qadir, announced that he is forming a movement to campaign for the ‘no’ side in the upcoming referendum on Kurdistan’s independence.  According to NRT’s web site, Mr. Qadir “…expressed his opposition against holding the Kurdistan Region’s referendum on independence on the scheduled date, describing it as a move to ‘gamble with people's lives.’” He added that ““We need a courageous and brave movement in the Kurdistan Region which can protect people’s rights.” 

The logic of such naysayers appears to be that “conditions for a referendum should be perfect” before being held. In other words, Hell should freeze over before the Kurds get to vote ‘yes’ to independence.  When this columnist read the news about Mr. Qadir, he wondered two things: First, if Kurds lack confidence in themselves, who will have it for them? Second, when people from Kurdistan have such views, who needs external enemies?

This was not the right reaction for someone living safely and comfortably in the United States, however. The people of Kurdistan have a serious referendum being put to them and they live in a dangerous neighborhood. Whatever one thinks of Mr. Qadir’s perspective, the man does not lack courage. His independent television station was burned to the ground in 2011 a week after it started broadcasting, while it was providing non-stop coverage of protests in Sulaimani aimed at the ruling parties in Kurdistan. In 2013 Mr. Qadir was wounded during an attempted assassination.

Many people in Kurdistan probably view Mr. Qadir’s ‘no’ stance as treacherous, and wonder if he is funded by Baghdad, Iran or other foreign powers hostile to the Kurds’ bid for independence. These too are the wrong questions and attitudes towards Mr. Qadir and those like him, however. 

Instead, a ‘no’ campaign from within Kurdistan should be welcomed by everyone. Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) leaders and other supporters of the ‘yes’ side should use this opportunity to foster an open, respectful and well considered public debate on the serious issues related to the referendum. They should confidently and courteously offer to debate Mr. Qadir on his own television channel and invite him to debate on other networks as well. 

If ‘yes’ supporters are ready for this referendum, they need to be able to explain clearly why the people can and should vote ‘yes’ on September 25. They should ask Mr. Qadir and other ‘no’ supporters when, exactly, they think a more suitable time for such a referendum could present itself? They could ask him when, exactly, he thinks Baghdad, Iran, Turkey, the United States and others will welcome a referendum on Kurdish independence? They could ask him how many of the newly independent states in the world – the likes of Slovenia, Croatia, Kosovo, Bosnia, Latvia, Eritrea, South Sudan and others – had clear and public international support for their independence before they themselves even made a move to secure it?

Without compromising Kurdistan’s interests, the ‘yes’ supporters also need to sketch out a rough outline of their vision for a new Kurdish state’s future. They need to discuss how they would see Kurdistan governed internally, and how it would maintain relations with neighbors.  Such a debate will help the people of Kurdistan see and understand that vision and decide if they can trust in it. 

By the same token, those supporting a ‘no’ on September 25 should describe their vision for remaining within Iraq. Since Baghdad demands things like monopoly control over oil and gas production and export throughout all of Iraq, and also holds the purse strings for Kurdistan’s budget (a budget that has been cut since 2014), how do the ‘no’ supporters envision securing real long-term Kurdish autonomy within Iraq? Do they even support autonomy?  Since Baghdad demands the “return” of disputed territories which it refused to allow a referendum for (as stipulated by Article 140 of the Constitution), how do ‘no’ supporters envision dealing with this issue?

There exist many other questions as well, of course, which is why the more debate precedes the referendum, the better. Everyone needs to vote with a clear head and confidence on September 25.

David Romano has been a Rudaw columnist since 2010. He holds the Thomas G. Strong Professor of Middle East Politics at Missouri State University and is the author of numerous publications on the Kurds and the Middle East.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw. 


Data pager
Page size:
FAUthman | 27/7/2017
If we can only get Kurdistan parliament to convene and pass the referendum laws, that would be enough for now. There is plenty of time for debates to follow the referendum on the pros and cons of independence when Arbil and Baghdad hopefully will engage in negotiations about their relationship. By then it will be more clear what Baghdad has to offer and there will be a new parliament in Arbil who can actively engage in airing the debates on the disengagement from Iraq.
Gorran is betrayal | 27/7/2017
How many questions do you want to ask a prisoner who refuses to be free ? Freedom like beuty and justice is the ultimate desire of every normal creature. Such god-given precious things should never be questioned, never be cautioned and never be submitted to blackmail or bargaining with traitors and criminal saboteurs.
Guy Debord | 27/7/2017
The most naive commentator of all: Davod Romano !
Aso | 27/7/2017
Long time no see Dave ! Thank you! The problem is that they can not understand that beyond all the befits that it will bring to kurdistan internationally, Independence is actually the first step towards holding the Central government in Hewler responsible for its wrong doings. Assuming that people like Qadir care about an increase in the welfare of Kurdish people. If he knew a bit of history he would have seen that this the only moment in more than one hundreds years of the struggles of the Kurds that they have had such a chance. If Barzani misses this, he will not be forgiven by the future generations of the kurds, including the offsprings of Mr Qadir .
bebegun | 27/7/2017
With all due respect it's not a matter of 'if' this guy is funded by Baghdad, Iran or other foreign powers hostile to the Kurds bid for independence, it's 'which' of these powers it is. You're questions are excellent by the way, questions these "critic's" will never ever dare to face in a open debate

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Renas | 8/16/2018 6:28:00 PM
It is time to stop calling Mr Barzani for president. He resignerad Rudaw, remember? He is just a person, not a God. You are doing same thing as PKK...
Muraz Adzhoev | 8/17/2018 11:44:33 AM
“Renas”, it's you a crazy, anonymous and ugly “person”, it’s you “the same thing” with absolutely ignorant opinion, point of view. Just stop your...
On anniversary, KDP hopes for more unity with other parties
| 22 hours ago | (3)
pete | 8/17/2018 7:37:46 AM
War is coming against Turkey. KRG should decide which side it is on before it's too late.
KURDISH NATINALIST | 8/17/2018 11:37:57 AM
US threatens more Turkey sanctions if pastor not freed
| 20 hours ago | (8)
Outsider | 8/16/2018 11:41:01 PM
@Muhamedzzz: A Muslim knows he/she is a Muslim... neither Turk, Kurd, Arab, Iranian, Malaysian, Indonasian etc. etc.. Your statement is not...
Mohamedzzz | 8/17/2018 5:27:55 AM
@Outsider: sorry, I don't agree with you, most Kurds are Muslim first and Turk, Kurd or Arab, etc.. later, Most Kurds in Turkey are Muslim first and...
Iranian Kurdish parties reject PJAK’s call for unity
| 14/8/2018 | (9)
Ali | 8/16/2018 9:15:31 AM
KDP and PUK is rubbish which thanks to international protection survived. But everything have its end this tribes can not rule forever west will not...
Ali | 8/17/2018 4:22:12 AM
The government itself is rubbish they must be removed
Erbil, Why all the rubbish?
| 14/8/2018 | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Sherzad Heini shares every day Kurdish culture in new book 18 hours ago |

Sherzad Heini shares every day Kurdish culture in new book

Heini began writing by publishing articles about more
US establishes Iran Action Group to ‘change regime’s behavior’ 18 hours ago | (2)

US establishes Iran Action Group to ‘change regime’s behavior’

"Our hope is that one day soon we can reach a new more
Kurdistan rejected the US alternative for referendum due to phrases: KDP 19 hours ago | (2)

Kurdistan rejected the US alternative for referendum due to phrases: KDP

“Our leadership was asked to postpone the more
0.843 seconds