US entered 'war of choice' on behalf of Israel: Iranian FM

8 hours ago
Rudaw
A+ A-

ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Tuesday accused Washington of entering a “war of choice” on behalf of Israel, after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States struck Iran preemptively to protect American forces from an anticipated retaliation.

“Mr. Rubio admitted what we all knew: U.S. has entered a war of choice on behalf of Israel. There was never any so-called Iranian ‘threat’,” Araghchi said in a post on X.

“Shedding of both American and Iranian blood is thus on Israel Firsters," Araghchi stated, adding that the American people "deserve better and should take back their country.”

Araghchi’s remarks came after Rubio told reporters Monday that Washington acted after learning Israel was preparing to strike Iranian targets and assessing that Tehran would respond against US forces in the region.

“We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties,” Rubio said.

He added that Iranian field commanders had been instructed to respond automatically if attacked. “If we stood and waited for that attack to come first before we hit them, we would suffer much higher casualties. And so the president made the very wise decision” to act alongside Israel.

Pressed on whether the US faced an imminent threat - a key legal threshold as Congress holds the constitutional power to declare war - Rubio said, “There absolutely was an imminent threat… We were not going to sit there and absorb a blow.”

The exchange follows an escalation after Israeli strikes in Tehran killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other senior officials on Saturday.

While Rubio said Washington ultimately believed “this operation needed to happen,” he stressed that “the objective of this mission is the destruction of their ballistic missile capabilities and of their naval capabilities,” not the government change, even as he said the US would welcome the Iranian people to "overthrow" it.

Comments

Rudaw moderates all comments submitted on our website. We welcome comments which are relevant to the article and encourage further discussion about the issues that matter to you. We also welcome constructive criticism about Rudaw.

To be approved for publication, however, your comments must meet our community guidelines.

We will not tolerate the following: profanity, threats, personal attacks, vulgarity, abuse (such as sexism, racism, homophobia or xenophobia), or commercial or personal promotion.

Comments that do not meet our guidelines will be rejected. Comments are not edited – they are either approved or rejected.

Post a comment

Required
Required
 

The Latest

The late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, waving next to a portrait of his predecessor Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during the 30th death anniversary of the latter at his shrine in Tehran on June 4, 2019. Photo: Khamenei.ir

How Iran chooses a new supreme leader under its constitution

Iran’s constitution does not explicitly foresee the killing of the supreme leader. Instead, it outlines a clear mechanism for selecting a successor in the event of death, resignation, dismissal, or incapacity.