Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

Al-Bab's uncertain future: Turkish, Syrian, and Russian interests at play

By Paul Iddon 5/2/2017
Turkish forces and their allied Free Syrian Army have besieged al-Bab for three months. Photo: AA
Turkish forces and their allied Free Syrian Army have besieged al-Bab for three months. Photo: AA
Turkey's Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmus unequivocally dismissed claims that Turkey will cede control of the northwest Syrian city of al-Bab back to Damascus late last month. Turkish ground forces and allied Free Syrian Army (FSA) militiamen have been besieging Islamic State (ISIS) militants in that city for three months now, resulting in most of the approximately 50 Turkish army, and several more FSA fighters, casualties sustained since the start of Operation Euphrates Shield last August. 

Unlike Jarablus and al-Rai, situated directly on the Syrian-Turkish border, al-Bab is about 30 kilometers into Syrian territory. The US-led coalition supported Turkey in the initial phases of Euphrates Shield, when they were fighting ISIS along the border, until they reached al-Bab, which Washington considered too deep into Syrian territory. Furthermore, back in November, Syria reportedly activated air defense missiles in northwest Syria and threatened to shoot down Turkish warplanes operating in Syrian airspace in support of the ground operation. Consequently Turkish jets did not enter Syrian airspace for a week until Ankara consulted with Russian military officials and were then able to resume strikes. 

In January, Russian jets began coordinating anti-ISIS airstrikes with the Turks in al-Bab, prompting Washington to continue supporting the Turks there too. Russia and Turkey now have an official coordination agreement for these operations. 

Also the Syrian regime, capitalizing on the defeat of the opposition in Aleppo, which is situated another 40 kilometers to al-Bab's southwest, has recently captured three villages seven kilometers to al-Bab's south, possibly putting them in a position to forcibly stake their right to reclaim al-Bab in the future. This is not unlike their, albeit failed, attempt to reestablish a sizable foothold in ISIS-occupied Raqqa province last June after the Syrian Kurdish Peoples Protection Units (YPG)-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) coalition advanced into that province's northern countryside in May. 

It's presently unclear if Russia will accept Turkey's continued presence in al-Bab, if and when they capture it from ISIS, and urge its ally in Damascus to follow suit. Damascus may prove less inclined to risk confronting Turkey over al-Bab without Russian backing. For its part Russia is unlikely to do so at the present since it has brokered a largely successful ceasefire in Syria – which excludes ISIS and the group formerly known as Jabhat al-Nusra – with Turkey.

“Russia’s best interest is to have a more cooperative Turkey, because via Turkey it can exert a limited influence on the Syrian opposition and channel the military conflict into a more preferable direction,” Timur Akhmetov, an analyst on Russia's Middle East foreign policy, told Rudaw English. 

“A mid-term presence of Turkey in northern Syria is not perceived by the Russian decision-makers as a serious threat to the Russian interests,” Akhmetov added. “In both, military and political terms, Turkey will be tolerated in Syria as long as it keeps focusing on fighting the ISIS and the PYD [the main Syrian Kurdish political party] and abstaining from politically challenging Assad.”

Akmetov believes this because “Russian decision-makers have this state-centrist mindset, whereby national interests enjoy high priority in international relations.” 

It's clear the Turkish incursion into northwest Syria was all about countering both ISIS and the YPG, both of whom the Turkish state perceives as serious security threats. Its current siege of al-Bab is as much about routing ISIS as it is about preventing the YPG/SDF from seizing that strategically important urban center which, under Turkish control, would stand as a major obstacle to the Kurds’ attempts to link up their northeastern cantons with their sole northwestern one, Afrin. 

“When Russia was approached by Turkey last year, before the start of Euphrates Shield, it demonstrated that, first, it acknowledges Ankara's national security concerns in regards to ISIS and the PYD,” concluded Akmetov. “On the other hand, by allowing the Turkish forces to operate on Syrian soil and airspace Russia wanted Turkey to concentrate its political and military efforts on the terrorist threats, rather than on fighting the Syrian government.” 

The Turkish government recently appears to have accepted that their prior desire to oust Assad, through supporting opposition groups, is now unrealistic and have consequently deferred to whatever decision results from current and future negotiations. As a result, the likelihood of a direct confrontation between Ankara and Damascus over al-Bab is less likely, at least for the time being.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
allan | 5/2/2017
The US has continued to isolate Turkey, with their continued support of Kurdish terrorists. Turkey had no choice but to make military collusion with Russia..Turkey has the largest army in the middle east, and will exert their desire. First to control the unbridled ambitions of the Kurds. 2nd Push the ISIS group from it's borders.3rd To produce a safe area for all peoples to finally bring peace to the region.
Brzoo  from Sulimani  Alan
Brzoo from Sulimani Alan | 5/2/2017
There is no doubt that Turkey's internal affairs gets more and more confused , they do not have complete control over their internal disunity , to deflect their population's attentions , from their internal affairs , they interfere with the Kurds in Rojava...soon Turkey will be kicked out from NATO , Germany does not trust them anymore.
PC | 5/2/2017
The Russians are foolish to turn their backs on Kurds for temporary deals with Erdogan. The best guarantee anyone could gain against Turkey (and Iran/Syria/Iraq) are the Kurds, all the Turkish factions from A-Z admit this. Now if Turkey's economy keeps getting worse Erdogan will be in serious trouble, the kemalists who are playing along for now are still very strong within the Turkish army and I wouldn't be shocked if they suddenly stage a coup. Then we have Trump who is a loose canon, we've seen how quickly he can turn 180 degrees on issues, so I wouldn't rely on his past statements.
Bob | 5/2/2017
Quite flawed, if not biased analysis. Turkey entered Syria because ISIS wasn't any longer capable of holding ground against Kurds. ISIS was NEVER a threat to Turkey. Everybody knows it...
FAUthman | 5/2/2017
Fast track ten years from now, will Turkey still be in Syria?, Yup! Will Turkey still be in NATO?, probably Nope or is on the way out. That may be the deal in the making between Putin and Erdogan!
4575 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

kurt basar | 12/13/2017 7:27:05 AM
Yes. it was & it's, except there is no such thing exist as an independent Iraq, but from now on you can call it the Southern Iran, with blessing of...
duroi | 12/13/2017 9:34:58 AM
Let's see who will replace him next month.
US: Implementation of Iraqi constitution addresses Kurdish grievances
| yesterday at 09:30 | (2)
Hander | 12/13/2017 9:00:39 AM
Very interesting. Thank you.
Pilgrims visit ancient church named for Christian convert
| yesterday at 08:45 | (1)
guest2002 | 12/12/2017 5:31:10 PM
From all the speech , the printer messed up when it got to the Peshmarga!!! These shiia jihadis are idiots!!!
Jagerxin derashy | 12/13/2017 6:31:48 AM
Bullshit! They all all heard the word that come out of Iraqi officials mouths including PM abadi,! They never mentioned peshmerga’ abadi wasn’t...
Baghdad claims 'printing error' for omitting Kurdish Peshmerga
| 12/12/2017 | (5)
Yassir Fekaiki
Yassir Fekaiki | 12/12/2017 7:27:38 PM
they should start with Prime Minster and Deputy Prime minister offices and salaries as they have gained enough and do not need to be on any salary in...
Azad | 12/13/2017 5:57:41 AM
What a joke. 1.2 million employees in a krg that has a population of 4.5m . Thats a whoppping 26% of the total population. In contrast, most...
KRG to make more salary cuts in 2018 after losing Kirkuk oil
| 12/12/2017 | (2)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Turkey launches artillery, airstrikes in Kurdistan mountains: official 10 hours ago |

Turkey launches artillery, airstrikes in Kurdistan mountains: official

the bombings did not cause casualties more
Hashd ‘pivotal’ in persuading Peshmerga to not fight in Kirkuk: commander 11 hours ago |

Hashd ‘pivotal’ in persuading Peshmerga to not fight in Kirkuk: commander

Security was imposed in the areas “without more
UN chief: Iran may be defying UN on missiles, OK on nukes 13 hours ago |

UN chief: Iran may be defying UN on missiles, OK on nukes

the UN is studying missiles debris fired at more
0.329 seconds