Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

How long will the United States stay in Rojava?

By Paul Iddon 18/2/2018
US Army Lt. Gen. Paul E. Funk II inspects a US military outpost in Manbij on February 7, 2018. Photo: AP
US Army Lt. Gen. Paul E. Funk II inspects a US military outpost in Manbij on February 7, 2018. Photo: AP

The US military presence in Syria is facing increased opposition, as its initial justification for being there — destroying the Islamic State (ISIS) — is gradually evaporating.


US officials say they are retaining troops in Syria's northeastern Kurdish regions (Rojava) for post-ISIS stabilization efforts, or even until the conflict in all of Syria is brought to an end through negotiations. Either of these things could well mean that the US will remain in Rojava for the long run, and with approximately 2,000 troops [only the 400 US Marines manning artillery on the front-lines during the Raqqa offensive have returned home to date] and a series of bases remaining, it has a highly formidable military presence in Syria.

The United States is allied with the Syrian Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) forces and the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) Arab-Kurdish fighting-force, of which the YPG is an integral part. These forces control the vast majority of Syria's northeast, its de-facto frontier with the rest of the country roughly conforming alongside the east bank of Euphrates River. These areas are also where Syria's oil reserves are situated, all of which were recently seized by the SDF from ISIS.

Damascus has come into more open conflict with the Kurds in recent months. In December Syrian President Bashar al-Assad called them "traitors" for working with the Americans. In January the US also faced firm opposition over its plans to build a 30,000-strong SDF border-guard force from the Syrian regime, Iran, Russia and Turkey – all of which alleged that this was part of some broader US plot to partition Syria. Washington would later claim that the whole thing was a misunderstanding.

On February 7 an attempt by approximately 500 paramilitaries – both pro-regime Iranian-trained militias and Russian mercenaries – backed up by tanks and artillery to attack an SDF headquarters in Deir ez-Zor province was promptly foiled by an array of US military aircraft (reportedly including everything from Apache attack helicopters to F-15E strike aircraft and AC-130 gunships) which heavily bombarded these forces, killing an unspecified number of them. A single T-72 tank was also destroyed by US air power on February 13 after reportedly firing on SDF positions.

The United States previously shot down a Syrian Su-22 warplane near Tabqa last summer when it attempted to attack the SDF, the first time a US fighter jet shot down another aircraft in an air-to-air engagement since the Kosovo War in 1999. 

These incidents — coupled with US downing of Iranian drones and bombing of regime ground forces approaching at-Tanf, where the US coalition has a training base for anti-ISIS forces near the Jordanian border last year — all demonstrate Washington's capability to swiftly and forcefully defend its positions across Syria.

It's not yet clear if these latest developments were indicative of a regime effort to wrest control over some of the peripheral territories controlled by the SDF in Deir ez-Zor or a more general effort to challenge the US military presence in northeast Syria.

Nevertheless both Damascus and Moscow slammed the US presence in Rojava as "illegal" following the February 7 incident. When US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called on Iran to withdraw its forces from Syria on February 14, Tehran reiterated its condemnation of the American presence and, once again, pointed out that unlike Washington, its military presence, mostly consisting of advisors training proxy militias, in the country is authorized by Damascus.

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova also lambasted the United States on February 15 by alleging that its presence in Al-Tanf is aimed at protecting remnants of ISIS. She also described the February 7 airstrikes as "defiant actions" which brought Washington "close to an open confrontation with the Syrian army."

As its presence in Syria is facing greater opposition from the regime and its Russian and Iranian backers, Washington will have to decide how far it's willing to go to defend its foothold in Rojava and its SDF/YPG allies. The US already clearly has de-facto no-fly and no-drive zones across Rojava, with the salient exception of Afrin Canton, to deter Damascus from attempting to re-subjugate the region. However as the ISIS threat recedes, and the Assad regime becomes more emboldened having reconquered most of the country, Washington's main objective in Syria may well shift gradually from solely destroying ISIS to combating Damascus itself.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
Alex | 18/2/2018
In my opinion they can stay as much as they need we kurdish people like American people but also we need to highlight America let kurdish people down on few occasions hopefully it'll not repeat in the future
help the kurds | 18/2/2018
Lets hope they stay and not turn there back on the Kurds.
Hamiad Kirkiuki | 19/2/2018
As a KURD,, living in USA for past 42 years ::.. I do NOT trust American at all..
Hamiad Kirkiuki | 19/2/2018
as a kurd living in occupied kurdistan by turks i trust anyone over a tatar
malik | 3/3/2018
Transfer usa troops from east river to west river to afrin ypg need help in afrin

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Hama | 12/15/2018 6:59:18 PM
They can go to hell. Be reasonable or don't talk. Suggesting ‘in-between’ status for disputed territories is not a legal or reasonable long term...
Realist | 12/16/2018 4:48:34 AM
I don’t understand why you waste your time . Let’s we here . I bet you if Kirkuk didn’t have oil it wouldn’t be the ‘heart’ of Kurdistan . Bunch of...
UN should revive ‘stillborn’ mediation on Kirkuk, disputed territories: ICG
| 13 hours ago | (2)
Renas | 12/15/2018 8:41:41 PM
Depends on, no-fly zone for all, or is THE enemy allowed to bomd there? A no-fly zone should forbid all ountries to fly there, that would have a...
Guest | 12/15/2018 9:26:48 PM
I disagree. A no fly zone is exactly that, a zone that prohibits certain aircraft from flying in that zone. In Iraq, its purpose was to prevent Iraqi...
How feasible is a no-fly zone for Rojava?
| 16 hours ago | (5)
Guest | 12/15/2018 9:06:23 PM
It is unfortunate, but I believe Turkey will continue to be emboldened to attack the sovereign territory of its neighbors unless it suffers a...
Turkey FM vows to continue strikes in Iraq if PKK isn't removed
| 19 hours ago | (1)
pre-Boomer Marine brat | 12/15/2018 6:38:20 PM
Zimmerman's "political disenfranchisement and grievances" are superficialities. She gets them from using pseudo-academic "social movement theory" to...
Guest | 12/15/2018 9:01:40 PM
Katherine Zimmerman is wrong if she says the current strategy is failing. I did not read her article mentioned here but from the quote she gave, it...
War on jihadists won’t end unless West tackles root causes: experts
| 14 hours ago | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Displaced huddle in a basement as winter grips Syria 1 hour ago |

Displaced huddle in a basement as winter grips Syria

"There is nothing to do here and no money more
Christians and Turkmen vie for top jobs in new KRG 10 hours ago |

Christians and Turkmen vie for top jobs in new KRG

They are calling for "real participation in the more
‘Unilateral’ moves in Syria will undermine ISIS fight, EU warns Turkey  11 hours ago |

‘Unilateral’ moves in Syria will undermine ISIS fight, EU warns Turkey

Erdogan warned on Wednesday he will soon deploy more
0.562 seconds