Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Assad in Afrin: Possible ramifications of Damascus' deployment

By Paul Iddon 21/2/2018
Pro-Syrian government forces arriving in Afrin on Tuesday. Photo: George Ourfalian/AFP
Pro-Syrian government forces arriving in Afrin on Tuesday. Photo: George Ourfalian/AFP
On Tuesday, pro-Syrian government forces, also known as Syrian National Defense Forces (NDF), arrived in the Kurdish enclave of Afrin following calls by the Kurds there for Damascus to defend Syria's international border against Turkey's ongoing incursion. The deployment is a major development, the outcome of which is far from clear. 

Turkey warned Damascus against sending forces to fight on the side of the Syrian Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) defending Afrin. However, it also said it would welcome a regime takeover of Afrin if it removed the YPG from the equation, which would fulfill Turkey's primary objective there. 

Professor Joshua Landis, a Syria specialist from the University of Oklahoma, argued just before this deployment that it could well constitute "a win-win for everyone." 

"Turkey wins because its YPG problem in Afrin would be solved," he told Rudaw English. "The Kurds win because they would not be defeated by a hostile military and would thus save life and home. The Syrian government would win because it restores its sovereignty over another region of Syria and would show that it can serve as a protector rather than threat to local populations."

Even the United States and Russia would benefit he argues, "because they can state that they have worked for stability in Syria."

The only stumbling block Landis foresees is the US government "dilemma" over "whether it weighs stability in Syria over its goal of rolling back Iran." 

"Many in Washington will see any deal that benefits the Syrian government to be a tantamount to appeasement of Iran," he concluded. 

Aaron Stein, a Resident Senior Fellow Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East at the Atlantic Council think-tank, believes it's "too early to tell" if Damascus will actually take control over Afrin from the YPG.

"I doubt the YPG will be subordinate to the NDF's command structure, but we'll have to see how this plays out," he told Rudaw English. 

The Kurds called on the regime to defend Afrin's borders, which they assert are legally and rightfully part of Syria's international border – implying that they will give the NDF certain positions from which to fight in defense of the canton rather than give them full control over the canton itself. 

Also, since Ankara has already targeted NDF positions in Afrin shortly after their deployment there it would make little sense for the NDF to risk clashing with the YPG in an attempt to take control over Afrin while they're both being attacked by the Turks. (It's also worth remembering that the YPG have clashed with NDF fighters in their regime enclaves in the Kurdish cities of Qamishli and Hasakah in the past, meaning to the Kurds these forces are a lesser evil to Turkey at best.) 

"I think the most interesting thing about this is the Russian-Regime dynamic," Stein said.

"It appears as if the regime defied Moscow and deployed militias in to Afrin in defiance of a separate Russian-Turkish agreement to facilitate the conduct of Olive Branch," he elaborated. "The question, now, is whether Russia will be forced to choose between Ankara and Damascus, as it seeks to navigate its own troubles in the Syrian civil war."

Moscow essentially acquiesced to the Turkish Olive Branch operation when it began on January 20 and pulled out the small force of military police it had previously deployed to the canton to de-conflict clashes between Turkey's Syrian militiamen proxies and the YPG, resulting in accusations of betrayal from the latter. 

Russia has the power to close Syria's northwestern airspace, as it reportedly did between February 5 and 9 after one of its warplanes in neighbouring Idlib province was shot down. Turkish airstrikes have continued unabated ever since. 

If Damascus cannot deter the Turkish Air Force from bombing Afrin by itself, then the NDF deployment is unlikely to have a hugely significant impact on the battlefield. In mid-November 2016, according to a report in Hurriyet news at the time, a Syrian regime threat to shoot down Turkish jets, after they bombed and killed a large number of YPG fighters the preceding month, did briefly deter the Turkish Air Force. However, upon consulting Moscow on this issue the Turks were able to resume providing air support to their forces against Islamic State in the al-Bab battle and successfully conclude their Euphrates Shield operation late last March. 

If the Russians refuse to support Damascus' current action, for Stein's aforementioned reasons, then Ankara may feel emboldened to target any Syrian air defenses that might hinder its domination of the skies above Afrin – the regime reportedly deployed anti-aircraft missiles to front-line positions in both Aleppo and Idlib provinces early this month. 

A YPG spokesperson told Al-Monitor that if it weren't for the aerial bombardments of Afrin they are confident they could drive out the Turkish-led forces "in no time." 

Stein concludes that the outcome of this latest development will likely be predicated upon "whether Turkey will risk escalation, or whether Moscow will try and control this from spinning out of control."


Data pager
Page size:
FAUthman | 21/2/2018
Very interesting comment by professor Landis and it could be true! a negotiated withdrawal by YPG to be replaced by regime army forces (not just militia) could be a win win for everybody!
kurd | 22/2/2018
This article is full of flaws. First, Syrian regime would never act contrary to Russian stance. second, that might lead to stability but it would be at the expense of kurds who would lose ground under such a scenario
Bolton Wond | 22/2/2018
To FAUthman. Win Win for Turkey Syria and Russia. Loss for the Kurdish dream of having a nation. Assad will control Afrin at this rate which Turkey would be more than happy with as long as Kurds dreams are ruined.
FAUthman | 22/2/2018
Bolton Wond you may be right. Many of us, however, are very concerned about what could happen in the city of Afrin, God forbid, with an overwhelming ground force supported by air power entering the city with only the YPG and now few regime militia to defend it. What are the options for the YPG then? Their leaders are well aware of the problem and are asking the regime for help! The borders are gone. Turkey has almost completed the belt which is on average less than 10 kms. deep. If Russia could persuade Turkey not to go any further that would be helpful. Perhaps Russia could convince Turkey that the Syrian army is replacing the YPG (the Syrian army is reportedly doing that in Tel Rifat) and that the airspace over Afrin, Russia could threaten, will be closed to the Turkish air force if Turkey does not halt its advance beyond the few miles from the border and if Turkey heeds Russia's call and stops its its offensive, that could avoid a major disaster and achieve a win for all. This has nothing to do with the long term Kurds' dream for self rule. It has to do with a real immediate problem that needs a solution. Tukey's advance needs to be stopped and the bombing of Afrin region and city halted.
FAUthman | 22/2/2018
I also agree with "Kurd" comment above, the withdrawal would "cause the Kurds to lose ground". Perhaps the best arrangement would be (but Turkey may not agree with) is for the regime forces secure Afrin side by side with the Kurds. In fact the regime may have to do that since the Kurdish assets would be needed to help the regime forces to secure the Afrin open territories and the city and man the front lines facing Turkey supported forces. An ultimate showdown with Turkey is inevitable to get Turkey completely out of Syria, which will not be easy, once there almost impossible to make Turkey leave!

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Leon | 4/20/2019 11:40:24 AM
Islam is cancer and it must be destroyed. The only way forward for the Middle East is to abandon Pisslam. It is the most vile religion and has driven...
Istanbul vote result marks watershed in political history
| 8 hours ago | (1)
Jay | 4/19/2019 10:43:13 PM
PUK should stop making tasks for forming the government harder and Iraqi Kurds should start negotiating with the central government. Despite PUK...
Kurdi | 4/20/2019 10:42:40 AM
Rudaw : how come only Muraz can comment and I see comments reduced to almost nil ??!!! This proves that you are clandestine
Gorran and PUK ready to sign on dotted line or are gaps still too big?
| yesterday at 11:24 | (4)
Peter | 4/20/2019 6:55:20 AM
Good. Turkish "soldiers" are terrorists, no different to any other member of ISIS.
4 Turkish soldiers killed in skirmish with PKK: defense ministry
| 11 hours ago | (1)
Hans | 4/11/2019 8:09:05 PM
@fraud, let's see if we understand this, so Kurds, who at the time held no power in Turkey, committed genocide on christians for Turks, then FLED...
Shahin Sorekli | 4/20/2019 4:39:55 AM
The name of this town has always been "Kobani." I challenge anyone to show me the evidence that the false name "Kobane" existed before 2011.
Kobane or Kobani? History won't care, but some locals will
| 10/4/2019 | (9)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

President Macron pledges ‘military, civilian support': SDC leader 20 hours ago | (1)

President Macron pledges ‘military, civilian support': SDC leader

The SDC is the political wing of the co more
Watchdog concerned with press freedom in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey 21 hours ago | (1)

Watchdog concerned with press freedom in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey

Norway, Finland and Sweden topped the list more
Iraq parliament to host regional rivals in Baghdad 22 hours ago |

Iraq parliament to host regional rivals in Baghdad

Baghdad has sought to bring Syria back into the more
0.485 seconds