Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Analysis

Hashd al-Shaabi in Shingal and Baghdad amending Article 140

By Paul Iddon 28/5/2017
A Hashd al-Shaabi fighter peers at a distant strike in northern Iraq. Photo: Iraqi PMU
A Hashd al-Shaabi fighter peers at a distant strike in northern Iraq. Photo: Iraqi PMU
The Iraqi Shiite-majority Hashd al-Shaabi paramilitaries, also known as the Popular Mobilization Forces or Units (PMF/PMUs) have taken their fight against Islamic State (ISIS) into the Shingal region. The paramilitaries declare they “will control the remaining areas still held by ISIS” and blithely dismissed the calls of the Kurdistan Region's leadership to stay out of that region. 

Dr. Beriwan Khailany, an MP in the Iraqi parliament and member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), is worried about the general post-ISIS situation in the region and the presence of these paramilitaries on the Kurdistan Region's de-facto frontiers.

“They are backing up the Iraqi military right now,” Khailany said. “But after Daesh [ISIS] it's not clear what will happen [to] them: Will they become a full part of the Iraqi military or remain a separate force?”


Khailany contends that the situation would be much less complicated and dangerous for the KRG if they were just dealing with the presence of regular Iraqi forces in that region. 

“If you have only normal military forces just like any other country that would be far better, with all the weapons in the right hands, under the Ministry of Defense rather than in the hands of militias,” she said.

While Iraqi legislation has been introduced to completely integrate the Hashd into the Iraqi military it's unclear if Baghdad can effectively exercise command and control over these large well-armed groups. 

An October 2015 Reuters exclusive even went so far as to suggest these paramilitaries could outgun the Iraqi state. Also analysts previously told Rudaw English that they fear that groups within the Hashd could soon resemble the Iraqi version of Hezbollah in Lebanon or the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in Iran – hence paramilitaries with as much power, if not more, than the regular armed forces. 

Incidentally Khailany isn't the only Kurdish official worried about a possible Hashd threat to Kurdistan. In February, Peshmerga commander Colonel Sirwan Muhammad pointed out that the Hashd are building up their forces south of Kirkuk. 

“We believe that they have come here to fight the Peshmerga when ISIS is gone,” Muhammad told Rudaw

Last summer Mahmoud Sangawi, a senior Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) official, even went so far as to declare that the Hashd “are now making plans on how to attack us after [ISIS's defeat].” 

If Hashd remains, despite recent legislation in the Iraqi parliament, a largely independent force then it could become a problem for the Kurdistan Region. Groups in the Hashd backed by Iran oppose Kurdish independence or the prospect of Kirkuk and other so-called disputed territories between Baghdad and the KRG becoming part of the latter. 

This is why Khailany is worried about the situation after ISIS, as the Kurdistan Region once again aims to hold a referendum on its independence which will need to include these regions in order to determine the precise borderlines of a potential Kurdish nation state. 

Under the Iraqi constitution's Article 140 the status of Shingal – and other areas, most notably Kirkuk – is supposed to be resolved through referendum of these regions' inhabitants. This raises the prospect that after ISIS's removal, the Hashd could continue to maintain a presence, establish facts on the ground and challenge the Kurdistan Regional Government's (KRG) authority there in disregard of whether or not Article 140 is ever implemented, as most of the local population is expected to vote for full integration into the Kurdistan Region.

Khailany says Baghdad is currently “ignoring Article 140” while “other politicians are thinking about amending the constitution, hence changing 140.”

“We want this article to be implemented. [Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-] Abadi doesn't mind but he says now is not the time for it because of the ongoing war. That's why we're thinking about after Daesh,” she said, using another term for ISIS. 

While the Peshmerga are in parts of Nineveh, which they liberated from ISIS control, there is still no public agreement with Baghdad over the status of these territories. 

“After Daesh they [Baghdad] have to think about implementing Article 140 to keep any problems away,” Khailany contends. “If we don't implement this article we're in big trouble.”

Now that the Hashd has established presence on the ground in Shingal the situation there has gotten much more complicated and volatile. Already local Yezidis were concerned by tensions between the KRG and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) there – especially after clashes between the KRG-trained Syrian Kurdish Rojava Peshmerga and the PKK-trained Sinjar Protection Units (YBS) group early last March. The Hashd may even side with the PKK in the region to undermine the KDP, a move which will risk making the Shingal situation much more combustible, destabilizing and destructive. 

If Baghdad continues to postpone the implementation of Article 140 then such unsavoury outcomes are more likely. Consequently the implementation of Article 140 should be among its priorities following ISIS's impending defeat in Iraq and all sides should respect its ultimate, and long overdue, result.

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
pual bremer senior | 28/5/2017
wellwellwell what a surprise, who could have guessed this? happy dappy ramadan yabadabadoo
bain | 28/5/2017
A week ago a huge gun fight broke out in the middle of Baghdad between one of these militias and Baghdad police resulting in dozens of casualties. Incidence like that happens all the time but is not reported by the Iraqi media.
Gerber d'Aurillac | 28/5/2017
Tehran and Baghdad are one bloc fighting against the Kurdish independence.They have the regular respective armies plus Hashd and PKK. In fact the author omits to discuss the Turkish factor which shares the same hostility towards the Kurdish independence. While the three anti -kurdish states will never dare, in the current circumstances, to invade Kurdistan , because America will stop them, Baghdad,Tehran and Ankara will rely on their paramilitary potencials wich are mainly the Hashd and the PKK to frustrate the Kurdish independence. It happens that while the Hashd is supported by Baghdad and Tehran , the PKK in adition to its loyalty to Iran and Iraq, it coordinates strictly also with Ankara through its criminal MIT in spilling Kurdish blood and antagonizing the Kurdish independence. Baghdad will never peacefully implement Article 140 , so the Kurdish president must react swiftly with the coordinates now on the ground ; and quickly. Barzani must make every possible concessions and sacrifices to reach out to the PUK (and others if possible) and act quickly because the situation could worsen by the day.
The Kurdish Boy | 28/5/2017
After Daesh, we have to fight now Hashd and PKK.
Blue Merchant | 28/5/2017
Too late for such warnings, these militias are already more powerful than the (shia) Iraqi army. To make matters worse the so called army consists of 80% Shia recruits, many are in fact former militia members who's loyalty to the chance of command is very questionable. Yesterday the Shia Iraqi foreign minster Jaaferi said that the Iraqi armed forces will be used against anyone who attacks Iran, a clear warning to the United States.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Shaxawan Chya | 12/15/2017 9:46:23 AM
Again plotting against Kurdistan... You will pay for this
Shaxawan Chya | 12/15/2017 9:52:08 AM
Did Votel forget how Erdogan lashed out at him? snapped at him??!!
US, Turkey, Iraq strengthen military ties in meeting of generals
| yesterday at 09:43 | (2)
Shaxawan Chya | 12/15/2017 9:47:37 AM
Plotting agaisnt Kurdistan...
Top US, Iraqi generals to meet Turkish counterpart in Ankara
| 12/12/2017 | (1)
jinan | 12/15/2017 8:47:43 AM
He is the brother of the Traitor Bafil. I think it is not a good idea for him to be a leader.
Yassir Fekaiki
Yassir Fekaiki | 12/15/2017 9:17:46 AM
It is not an automatic hereditary right for families to continue to rule a political party. What about all those who co established the PUK and were...
Qubad Talabani tipped for top PUK position: officials
| yesterday at 11:51 | (5)
duroi | 12/15/2017 8:00:11 AM
Turkey is running from east to west (and back) like a headless chicken. But in the long run, there are two final outcomes: (1) Turkey moves to...
Is Russia forging closer relations with Syria's Kurds?
| yesterday at 10:00 | (1)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Netherlands PM asked Abadi to lift Kurdistan flight ban 11 hours ago |

Netherlands PM asked Abadi to lift Kurdistan flight ban

Erbil-Baghdad ties are an important issue for more
Not one 'single dinar': Yezidi MP slams Baghdad for failing Shingal 12 hours ago |

Not one 'single dinar': Yezidi MP slams Baghdad for failing Shingal

Shingal mayor Mahma Khalil signaled alarm over more
PM Barzani to visit Germany next week 13 hours ago |

PM Barzani to visit Germany next week

Barzani may meet privately with Chancellor Angela more
0.422 seconds