Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Would the US really sever Peshmerga funds if Kurdistan secedes?

By Paul Iddon 30/6/2017
Last summer the US provided $415 million to help Peshmerga troops. Photo: Farzin Hassan/Rudaw
Last summer the US provided $415 million to help Peshmerga troops. Photo: Farzin Hassan/Rudaw
The United States' adherence to a continued One Iraq Policy has again become evident in the language of the new draft annual defense bill from the House Armed Services Committee. The bill suggests that Washington cut funds to the Kurdistan Region if it secedes from Iraq.

“The committee notes that funding to the [Kurdistan Regional Government] is to enhance Government of Iraq-KRG cooperation and support a unified effort to counter the Islamic State,” read the bill. 

“Such funding should be contingent upon KRG participation in the government of a unified Iraq and on their continued good faith cooperation in the anti-ISIL campaign,” it added, using an alternative acronym for ISIS. 

The war against ISIS brought an unprecedented level of cooperation between two former historic enemies, the Iraqi Army and the Peshmerga. 

Even as recently as the premiership of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki there was a possibility that the Iraqi Army's guns would be turned against the Peshmerga. The former prime minister deployed his forces to the autonomous region's frontiers and even once went so far as telling his generals he would send his forces into Erbil after Iraq took delivery of F-16 jet fighter-bombers from the United States – which is why Kurdish President Masoud Barzani lobbied Washington against selling those jets to Baghdad at that time. 

Today the guns of these two armed forces are pointed in the same direction, and at the same enemies. 

President Barzani even said in his recent interview with Foreign Policy magazine that an independent Kurdistan will not only continue cooperating with Baghdad on counter-terrorism operations, but will even “increase the coordination between the Peshmerga forces and the Iraqi army.” 

In other words Kurdish secession from Iraq does not necessarily mean that such cooperation between Erbil and Baghdad will cease. In fact US severing of funds to the Peshmerga could serve to undermine the effectiveness of these productive joint efforts, which is the only real success story left in the Baghdad-Erbil relationship. 

Last summer the US provided $415 million to help the Peshmerga troops, who had gone for months without receiving their salaries while holding the line against Islamic State (ISIS). Propping them up as an effective ground force served Washington's interests and will continue to do so since they successfully enforce that pro-American region's security and stability. 

The US-led anti-ISIS coalition also has plans to keep military trainers in the region for the next ten years to professionalize the Peshmerga. This endeavour is aimed at helping the Peshmerga effectively defend their region against non-state actors like ISIS and keeping it as a reliable regional counter-terror and defense force. Were the US government to sever funds to the KRG it would harm this productive and promising program. 

ISIS's capture of Mosul and subsequent attack on Kurdistan in the summer of 2014 made clear that Erbil can never rely entirely on Baghdad for its defense. Furthermore its current status as an autonomous region, rather than a full-fledged independent state, meant there were constraints on the types of weapons it could import. Consequently, the Peshmerga remained a relatively lightly-armed force since the region could not legally purchase heavy weapons. 

Barzani clearly referenced these obstacles in his op-ed piece in the Washington Post when he said were Kurdistan independent when ISIS emerged and attacked the region in 2014 “we could have financed and equipped our own troops and brought this fight to a swifter conclusion.” 

Were this the case the region could also have depended less on US military aid, delivered as it was through Baghdad, since the region would have a greater responsibility in fulfilling its own defensive needs. 

While this aforementioned bill hasn't yet been implemented, and might not be, it is nevertheless a stark reminder of the lengths Congress believes it should go to uphold a unified Iraq, even if that means halting funding to a stalwart ally which is still in dire straits economically. 

If the Kurds opt for independence in the upcoming referendum in September, which is more likely than not, and Erbil successfully negotiates an “amicable divorce” with Baghdad, their stated plan, the slashing of existing, and future, funds from the US to that emergent nation-state would prove counterproductive.



Data pager
Page size:
M Gonzales | 1/7/2017
Don't panic and move ahead with your vote. When your independent you can purchase real military equipment and while I know this may seem scary it's not that big of a deal. My advice would be to declare independence independence and then buy a Chinese SAM system and a dozen JF-17 fighters. No they are not premiere systems but they are affordable and good enough that your enemy's won't be able to use their air force and I doubt your enemy's can defeat the peshmerga without their air force. The US WILL come around once you offer bases, most of the US servicemen I know love the peshmerga.
Publish Me Fam | 1/7/2017
You can't even pay your army yet you talk about independence, the fact that another country has to pay for your army tells you in which shape Iraqi Kurdistan really is. Let me add on top of this that you will not get any sort of independence or whatever you want to call it.
FAUthman | 1/7/2017
Paul Iddon's reasoning is very impressive in this excellent column!
duroi | 1/7/2017
With the growing presence of Russia in the region, KRG, post referendum, has 2 options of (1) remaining in the US camp or (2) joining the Russian camp. Joining the Russian camp has this advantage that Syria is a client of Russia and landlocked KRG can export its oil through Syria if other export corridors are blocked and KRG can also join as an observer or full member of Shanghai 5. If US continues pursuing its expired policies towards Kurdish independence in the region and does not adopt new policies, it will lose Kurds for sure.
Trusted Allies | 1/7/2017
Those opposing the Kurdish independence they want to paralyse the Trump administration and sabotage any American interests in the region. Trump well knows that the Kurds are his only trusted allies in the region and he will never betray them.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Hama | 12/15/2018 6:59:18 PM
They can go to hell. Be reasonable or don't talk. Suggesting ‘in-between’ status for disputed territories is not a legal or reasonable long term...
Realist | 12/16/2018 4:48:34 AM
I don’t understand why you waste your time . Let’s we here . I bet you if Kirkuk didn’t have oil it wouldn’t be the ‘heart’ of Kurdistan . Bunch of...
UN should revive ‘stillborn’ mediation on Kirkuk, disputed territories: ICG
| yesterday at 09:01 | (2)
Renas | 12/15/2018 8:41:41 PM
Depends on, no-fly zone for all, or is THE enemy allowed to bomd there? A no-fly zone should forbid all ountries to fly there, that would have a...
Guest | 12/15/2018 9:26:48 PM
I disagree. A no fly zone is exactly that, a zone that prohibits certain aircraft from flying in that zone. In Iraq, its purpose was to prevent Iraqi...
How feasible is a no-fly zone for Rojava?
| yesterday at 06:16 | (5)
Guest | 12/15/2018 9:06:23 PM
It is unfortunate, but I believe Turkey will continue to be emboldened to attack the sovereign territory of its neighbors unless it suffers a...
Turkey FM vows to continue strikes in Iraq if PKK isn't removed
| yesterday at 02:45 | (1)
pre-Boomer Marine brat | 12/15/2018 6:38:20 PM
Zimmerman's "political disenfranchisement and grievances" are superficialities. She gets them from using pseudo-academic "social movement theory" to...
Guest | 12/15/2018 9:01:40 PM
Katherine Zimmerman is wrong if she says the current strategy is failing. I did not read her article mentioned here but from the quote she gave, it...
War on jihadists won’t end unless West tackles root causes: experts
| yesterday at 07:19 | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Russian mothers of ISIS runaways form support group 3 hours ago |

Russian mothers of ISIS runaways form support group

1,800 Russian women and children are thoughts to more
Turkey-backed Syrian forces train in Aleppo as Ankara threatens new offensive 4 hours ago |

Turkey-backed Syrian forces train in Aleppo as Ankara threatens new offensive

Ankara's Syrian proxies participated in the Afrin more
UPDATE: SDF rejects Peshmerga offer to bolster Syria-Turkey border: monitor 5 hours ago |

UPDATE: SDF rejects Peshmerga offer to bolster Syria-Turkey border: monitor

It comes days after Turkey threatened to attack more
0.484 seconds