Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





After al-Bab: Will Turkey's next move compromise the Kurdish-led Raqqa operation?

By Paul Iddon 28/2/2017
The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) wrested control of the strategic Tishreen Dam from ISIS late in 2015. Photo: AP
The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) wrested control of the strategic Tishreen Dam from ISIS late in 2015. Photo: AP
Turkey's capture of the northwestern Syrian city of al-Bab from Islamic State (ISIS) militants has put Ankara at a crossroads where its choices are to either: 1.) consolidate its gains and secure these captured territories; or 2.) push on to attack the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in nearby Manbij, and possibly ISIS in Raqqa, too. 

“Turkey and the FSA [Free Syrian Army] have cleared some of the main strongholds of Daesh [ISIS], including Dabiq, Jarablus and al-Bab, and are likely to continue with clearing Manbij and Afrin of Democratic Union Party (PYD) terrorists,” read a recent article in Turkey's pro-government Daily Sabah. 

If this turns out to be correct it would be a dangerous move for Turkey to make. An attack on Manbij will likely see more SDF fighters rush in from the east to defend that city and the SDF's Manbij Military Council there. An attack on Afrin would certainly result in war between Ankara and the SDF/YPG, since Afrin is part of Syria Kurdistan proper. This, for obvious reasons, would result in SDF manpower and resources being diverted away from the Raqqa offensive.

Ankara has repeatedly said for a long time that if the PYD's armed wing, the People's Protection Units (YPG), were to capture Raqqa it would have severe repercussions. Aside from arguing that backing a YPG operation in Raqqa is a flawed policy of replacing one terrorist group with another in Raqqa, Ankara has also been insisting that using this group to take Raqqa could lead to destabilizing ethnic tensions. 

“More than 90 percent of the Raqqa population is Arab,” said Turkish Defense Minister Fikri Işık on February 23. “If you assign a terror organization with a different ethnic background to save the city, you would cause big instability. The same was also valid for Mosul.” 

Turkey initially acquiesced to the SDF's offensive into the Arab city of Manbij because mostly Arab fighters were assigned to spearhead that operation – with a small supporting force of Kurdish YPG fighters. Just two days after Işık's comment the official US Central Command's (CENTCOM) Twitter page published photos of Syrian Arab members of the SDF they are training. The Manbij model, using Arab-majority SDF units to liberate Arab cities, is clearly being followed in the Raqqa operation, a fact which should assuage Işık's concerns of possible ethnic tensions. Arab tribesmen fighting under the flag of that coalition will likely be welcomed by Raqqa's population as liberators as much as, if not more than, any Arab FSA, or other, force Ankara could muster for the same unenviable undertaking. 

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has repeatedly, for months now, vowed to advance against Manbij, and even Raqqa, once al-Bab was captured. In Manbij he wants to rout the SDF/YPG, who captured the city back in August. In Raqqa, he's said Turkey could even defeat ISIS and establish a safe zone for displaced Syrians there. However, on all these points, Turkish officials have given notably different assessments. The most striking one, which runs directly contrary to Erdogan's assertions, was from Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmus, who said in a recent statement, before al-Bab's capture, that: “With al-Bab, Euphrates Shield will be over as goals will have been achieved. Raqqa is something else. It doesn't threaten Turkey's borders.” 

Also, Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim said that Turkey will not get directly involved in the Raqqa operation, but instead play a tactical supporting role.

“The United States, Turkey along with local forces, civilian forces, and FSA and other militias... They are at the forefront while we are at the back,” Yildirim said, according to Anadolu.  

Kurtulmus also previously said, late in January, that his government has no intention of handing al-Bab over to the Syrian regime, whose forces control the road from Deir Hafir to the city's southeast.

Sitting tight in al-Bab and the northwestern territories it captured since August would solidify Turkey's primary objectives in northwest Syria: pushing ISIS south of its border, preventing rocket and terrorist attacks against Kilis, and other areas in Gaziantep, and the SDF/YPG from linking Afrin to the rest of their territories east of the Euphrates River. SDF/YPG-controlled territories — the so-called Shahba region protruding out of Afrin to al-Bab's west and Manbij to its east — cannot be connected by these groups to form a continuous Syria Kurdistan while the Turkish military and/or FSA maintain a formidable presence in al-Bab. 

So, provided the SDF/YPG do not attack Turkish-FSA forces in these areas, and vice versa, both sides should remain in a de-facto ceasefire mode, in subtle recognition that an escalation of clashes will destabilize that corner of Syria and affect both of them negatively. 

Were Turkey not to take this course and assault Manbij — or worse Afrin — it could fatally undermine, or completely compromise, the efforts the US has been undertaking to make the SDF a competent force capable of seizing Raqqa and giving ISIS in Syria a mortal blow.


Data pager
Page size:
Flaminco | 1/3/2017
The turks main argument here is that Raqqa is an Arab majority city, well so is Al-Bab! when will the invading Turkish army and their turkmen proxies hand over Al-Bab to the Arabs?
Problems | 1/3/2017
What us turkey problems. It 's an Arab city not a city occupied by Turkmen. Are they so concerned by Arab being harmed. I don't think so. It's only an accuse against Kurd occuping al Raqqa. Turk have problem about Kurd being a nation because this might give Kurd in turkey the same ambition to have a nation in turkey. That is what they fear. That does not give turkey the rights to interfere in other country. Absolutely no right to interfere. So turkey back off. To me Daesh and turkey terrorists are more more dangerous and any organization because turkey might start world war three.
kurt basar | 1/3/2017
Turks are intend to attack not only Manbij but the Kandil mountains in Irak as well, by doing that they are trying to help their ISIL brothers of the Ragga. Present Turkish regime is represents the Muslim brotherhood and ISIL terrorists, because of that this AKP cult and their insane leader of the Salafi terrorists must be stop by any cost otherwise god help the Kurd's & westren civilization
dire straights | 1/3/2017
Turkish backed rebels took Jarablus and Azaz? really? when did this happen? every military expert and all observers on the ground confirmed that ISIS withdrew from that area except for Al Bab, it took the Turkish army and their "FSA" 6 month to capture Al Bab, even with Russian and American air support. Russia the Assad regime and the US went along and agreed to Turkey taking Al Bab while none of them will agree to an attack on Manbij by Turkey so on which planet can Turkey attack Manbij?
duroi | 1/3/2017
The shadow of the coup is hanging on Erdogan's head to the extent that his chief of staff Gen Akar accompany him in his foreign visits now. Erdogan is keeping Akar close by and is keeping the army busy in wars to prevent another coup. The army is clearly upset and it has given him a formal warning in the Hurriyet's "Karargah Rahatsiz" article by raising 7 issues. A Kurdish ceasefire with Turkish army add more to Erdogan's anxieties.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Not yet | 3/23/2019 9:28:18 AM
One of the most brutal terrorist organizations ISIS has lost all it's territory thanks to the sacrifices of Kurdish forces from all parts of...
Thank you Kurds | 3/23/2019 9:37:36 AM
Kurdish lead SDF lost 8000 fighters and were central in defeating ISIL in Rojava and rest of Syria, but let's also not forget that ISIL's first real...
SDF declare ‘total elimination’ of ISIS caliphate
| 23 hours ago | (2)
Afrin is Kurdish | 3/23/2019 8:12:22 AM
Turkey must be expelled from Afrin and other Kurdish territories .
Karl Reiter | 3/23/2019 8:18:42 AM
There is no problem with Golan since the 1967 war.The problem was before that date,not after.The UN has no say over Golan since it tolerates and it...
Trump’s Golan statement draws strong regional condemnation
| 23 hours ago | (2)
Artush | 3/23/2019 3:37:17 AM
FLynn the fake spy traitor criminal and his mullah boss contractor, same ppl recommended James Mattis to Trump to become DS. https://heavy...
IranMan | 3/23/2019 5:56:04 AM
@pre-Boomer Marine brat, Mahabad was Soviet invention that had to be eradicated - I'm referring to the "Jomhuri-e-Mahabad" not the city. The Iranian...
Iran leader dismisses Europe trade mechanism as 'bitter joke'
| 21/3/2019 | (10)
kurd | 3/22/2019 12:00:59 PM
The real problem is a bunch thieves who are running the country. corruption has been a reward of islamic revolution. country is drowning in...
luv u 2 hunibuni | 3/23/2019 4:19:13 AM
The devastating victim card stories again by iranian "refugees" !! About how sanctions hurts iranian "middle class"? REALLY? Iranian middle class ??...
Iran leader calls economy 'urgent problem'
| 21/3/2019 | (6)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Iraqi fisherman flounder on the Shatt al-Arab 8 hours ago |

Iraqi fisherman flounder on the Shatt al-Arab

Iran and Kuwait prevent them from fishing further more
Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’ 9 hours ago |

Trump: ISIS ‘are losers, will always be losers’

"We will remain vigilant" more
ISIS loses all territory but its shadowy leader still at large 10 hours ago |

ISIS loses all territory but its shadowy leader still at large

“The Coalition is not holding him nor do we know more
0.328 seconds