Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

From Tikrit to Bashir

By Paul Iddon 2/5/2016
The Hashd al-Shaabi militias fighting ISIS. AFP File Photo.
The Hashd al-Shaabi militias fighting ISIS. AFP File Photo.
Over the weekend the Kurdish Peshmerga managed to launch a successful offensive to recapture the ISIS-occupied village of Bashir, 20 miles south of Kirkuk. The Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF or Hashd al-Shaabi) failed in their attempts to singlehandedly recapture that same village over the course of the past several months.

The Peshmerga were given air support by the US-led coalition, which hasn’t provided that to the Hashd offensives against ISIS-held areas: the Shiite militia has not wanted that support anyway. Consequently, the Hashd tried to recapture the village on their own, losing scores of fighters in the process.

This is reminiscent of what happened in Tikrit back in March 2015, albeit on a much smaller scale. On that occasion the Hashd al-Shaabi sought to spearhead the liberation of Tikrit from ISIS, with the Iraqi Army following their lead and the US coalition excluded.

After a month of trying they failed and Tikrit was only liberated from ISIS after the coalition gave close air support to an Iraqi Army offensive there.

The largest city the Iraqi military has managed to force ISIS out of was Anbar's provincial capital Ramadi late last December. That operation saw an elite counter-terrorism unit of the Iraqi Army spearhead an offensive with close coalition air support, which destroyed large parts of the city in the process.

Hashd offensives against ISIS in Anbar have been discouraged since day one by many observers who warn that having Shiite-majority militiamen march into Sunni-majority parts of Iraq will have incendiary effects and could even spark a general Sunni revolt -- something which could actually benefit ISIS, which has shrewdly exploited Sunni-Shiite sectarian tensions to its advantage in the past.

While ISIS has been forced from Ramadi by the Iraqi military -- which is still fighting ISIS elsewhere in Anbar -- Fallujah remains under the group’s control. Only a few hundred ISIS militants are estimated to be holed-up in the city, with the Hashd surrounding it and cutting it off (which was the plan from the beginning), resulting in very disturbing reports that some of the city's residents are actually starving to death under the siege. This is certainly a disturbing precedent to contemplate for Mosul, where a Sunni-majority population is unlikely to welcome a force which includes Hashd militiamen into their city – even if it is for the strict ad-hoc purpose of forcing ISIS militants out of it.

Speaking of uprisings, one of the primary reasons the month-old Iraqi Army's offensive against ISIS-held villages on the Makhmour Front has gotten off to such a painstakingly slow start has been the fact that the local populations haven't risked mounting uprisings against their ISIS occupiers, likely because they are not certain that they will be liberated quickly by the military once they do so. It is crucial that those undertaking the arduous task of forcing ISIS from that city are either welcomed by the population or at least not opposed by them. Hashd would likely be opposed and its participation would likely be more of a hindrance than a help.

Bashir is a Shiite majority village of no more than 1,800 families which Hashd failed to liberate on their own. Hashd also failed to prove last year that they were up to the task of liberating a Sunni city, Tikrit, on their own. They are therefore unlikely to be up to the task of liberating Mosul, especially without coalition air support, which they are extremely unlikely to seek or receive.

With all that being said it's important to acknowledge that Hashd has played a useful role in this war. When the Iraqi Army was in disarray following the fall of Mosul in the summer of 2014 it was the militiamen of Hashd al-Shaabi who mobilized to ensure ISIS didn't overrun Samarra or try and bomb the al-Askari shrine. Thanks in part to the Hashd al-Shaabi ISIS weren't ever going to be able to overrun Baghdad without being ripped to shreds by the various Shiite militiamen who make up that groups rank-and-file.

None of these are irrelevant or unproductive contributions to the ongoing war effort. However if the Hashd al-Shaabi opt to march north and lay siege to Mosul they will undermine these worthy contributions and possibly even compromise the fragile military-political efforts aimed at completely defeating ISIS for good.

Paul Iddon is a Rudaw reporter based in Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

Comments

 
bain | 2/5/2016
The Hasd might've been necessary right there in the beginning but they were suppose to be a temporary solution until the army was build up again. Instead the opposite has happened, the Hashd outnumber the army at least 10:1 and have received the same heavy weapons as the army from Baghdad. They are a deadly tool in the hands of extremist Shia factions and organized criminal gangs. Simply put they're a very bad idea which will later turn into a true nightmare.
FAUthman | 3/5/2016
It is clear who will spearhead the military campaign to liberate and then occupy Mosul: Only the groups that will receive coalition air support will and that is the Iraqi army and the Kurdish Peshmerga. One third of the city will be liberated by the Peshmerga and the Christian militia in neighborhoods inhabited mostly by Kurds and Chritians. The other 2/3 of the city will be liberated by the Iraqi army.

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

pedo | 6/23/2018 4:02:18 AM
thanks
Registration opens for party alliances in KRG elections
| 18/6/2018 | (1)
not armed! | 6/18/2018 9:31:36 PM
I suppose KRG will be happy to take up arms against the Kurdish freedom fighters to protect Iran? Brilliant!!!!!
OneNation | 6/22/2018 11:42:26 PM
Kick them out KRG, bunch of grandpa led communist terrorists. Iran will not tolerate tribalists, racists and children of landowners/khans b...
KRG won’t let armed parties harm ties with Tehran: spokesperson
| 17/6/2018 | (2)
Mehdi giudarzi | 6/22/2018 7:38:35 PM
Ok
To many trolls | 6/22/2018 9:04:13 PM
As usual no shortages of Turkish and Iranian trolls here, most times they post under Kurdish sounding names lashing out at the US Israel etc. other...
World Cup 2018: Who is Iran’s Kurdish goalkeeper?
| yesterday at 10:07 | (10)
Frank | 6/22/2018 10:40:20 AM
No up until now the US has upheld all it's commentment to the Kurds of Rojava, they defused the situation in Manbij and prevented a Turkish assault...
US Patriot for Kurdistan | 6/22/2018 2:08:07 PM
Sorry, the US never had a presence in Afrin and they never promised the Kurds in Afrin that they would come there to provide help in any way,...
We are staying in Manbij: US general
| yesterday at 07:03 | (6)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Iran at OPEC: Kirkuk pipeline would increase current oil exports 10-fold 9 hours ago |

Iran at OPEC: Kirkuk pipeline would increase current oil exports 10-fold

we need to increase the level of this swap more
Coalition drops leaflets of ISIS leaders over eastern Syria: monitor 9 hours ago |

Coalition drops leaflets of ISIS leaders over eastern Syria: monitor

"We are in al-Zibah village at the moment more
Burned Kurdish schoolgirls to appeal to President Rouhani for care abroad 11 hours ago |

Burned Kurdish schoolgirls to appeal to President Rouhani for care abroad

Thirty-seven of the girls were injured more
0.234 seconds