Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

The new nation of Kurdistan may be joining a new Middle East

By Paul Davis 11/9/2017
.
.
Increasing moves by Russia and Iran are attempting to change the political face of the region. Iran along with its proxy forces such as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and Hezbollah are extending the political and military reach of Tehran that may allow its influence to reach the Mediterranean. Russia has inserted itself into the Syrian civil war and has been making overtures to Turkey, whose relationship with the west has soured in recent years due to the actions of President Erdogan and his AK party. 

This past June, Russia and Turkey announced that the Turkish military would purchase the S 400 anti-aircraft missile system from Russia in lieu of purchasing a NATO system. The S 400 is the most advanced system in the Russian arsenal and could effectively deny the US-led coalition the ability to provide a no-fly zone over northern Syria or provide anti-Assad forces, including the Syrian Kurds, air cover. 

Iran has continued to increase its power over the Iraqi government in Baghdad and is in full control of the PMF, which are technically under control of the Iraqi government but are in fact trained, armed, and loyal to Tehran. This is in addition to its support to Lebanese Hezbollah and continued support to the Assad regime. Iran has become the most powerful and influential force in the region. 

While Russian intent is to reestablish the “Great Game” and reinsert itself as a regional power, Iran is suspected to be working with North Korea to continue its nuclear and missile research in technical violation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, more commonly known as the Iran deal. The Iran deal was intended to keep Iran from continuing nuclear weapons research for at least 15 years, with an assumed breakout time of 1 to 2 years after that. Cooperating with North Korea, it is highly likely that Iran could have nuclear weapons in a very short time and has indicated it may pull out of the deal. 

The North Korean program is directed at protecting North Korea from perceived US desires to overthrow the Kim regime and forcibly reunify the Korean peninsula. Another reason for North Korea to have nukes is to force a reunification on its terms and to blackmail the regional neighbors into accepting a unified Korea.

The Iranian program would have only one target, Israel, the only nuclear power in the region. It is unlikely that either country would hold back on the use of its nuclear arsenal. Should Iran decide not to launch at Israel it could still hold the region hostage with the threat of nuclear war. 

Where does this leave Kurdistan? The answer is dependent on the actions of the US and the future of Kurdish independence. The future of Kurdish independence is less uncertain than the actions of the US. Assuming successful independence, the US must become the protector of not only Kurdistan but the region. A nuclear Iran will be a threat to not only peace in the region but the sovereignty of regional governments. The US will be forced to increase its presence in the region as well as ensuring that it is understood it will meet any use of weapons of mass destruction with a response in-kind. The easiest way to do this is to reduce the Iranian threat before it becomes overpowering. 

A belief in US military power has been a problem recently, as the US has been perceived to be a paper tiger, a nation that will not use the full weight of its military. There is no quick and easy fix to this perception, but a strong response to North Korean activities would be a start as would be an unmistakable military presence in Kurdistan. Time is running short for Kurdistan to benefit from either US action or Iranian inaction. The face of the region is changing and the KRG must choose a protector. The only two countries that could fill the need are the US or Russia. Historically Russian assistance has cost nations sovereignty and independence of actions. Turkey could also fill in, but at what price.

Paul Davis is a retired US Army military intelligence and former Soviet analyst. He is a consultant to the American intelligence community specializing in the Middle East with a concentration on Kurdish affairs. Currently he is the president of the consulting firm JANUS Think in Washington D.C.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
aa | 11/9/2017
We support you from ISRAEL. hope for more non-mad country in the middle east.
Nash | 11/9/2017
Don't think the big powers will let Turkey or Iran lure the Kurds away, that will give them to much of an advantage. In a way Kurds are lucky that both Iran and Turkey are hostile towards them otherwise one of them (with Kurdish backing) would've doubled or tripled their reach and influence.
Kerra | 11/9/2017
It's fully possible to put a viable strong kurdish buffer state smack in the middle of this strategic region with US, Russian or Chinese assistance. The author left out China which is re-establishing the silk road, that's no small detail. No one is saying it out load but kurdish real estate has never been more valuable, they're all pretending not be interested so that they can get a "good deal" later but believe when I tell you all that the second any country makes a hostile move towards the new kurdish state the bidding will begin.
Jake | 11/9/2017
This is a very interesting article and more so it is real time truth. I hope the U.S. stands tall and joins forces with a true friend, the Kurds. We have no better allies than the kURDS..
rastgo | 11/9/2017
In any case, an independent Kurdistan would largely be at the mercy of its unfriendly and unequally powerful neighbors (Iran, Turkey). The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Turkey have already explicitly spoken out against the announced referendum. Turkey has repeatedly referred to the Kurdish referendum as a serious mistake with unpredictable consequences, and has called on the political leadership of the South Kurds to cancel their referendum. The same Turkey has been bombarding Southern Kurdistan for decades, poisoning the ecological foundations of the country. Iran is involved in these bombardments, albeit to varying degrees. In the meantime, more than 2/3 of the Kurdish civilian population has been expelled from the border regions of Turkey / Iran / Iraq. Even among the Kurds, fears are widespread that Kurdistan is largely defenseless to its militarily superior neighboring states. But it is true that Israel, the strongest military power in the Middle East, has largely the same security interests as a Kurdish state against an Arab, increasingly religious environment. Therefore the Kurds should chose Israel as their protector if possible!?
3935 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

BIJI KDP BIJI YPG | 11/24/2017 10:27:11 AM
The Kurds of Bashur will not accept this. I love Barzani and I stand with YPG!
Erdogan sees likely cooperation with Assad against YPG
| 21 hours ago | (1)
What a SHAME! | 11/24/2017 2:46:56 AM
I am wondering: Do the KRG and its stupid spokesman, Safeez Dizayee, understand that by calling on the Iraqi government to respect the ruling of the...
guest2002 | 11/24/2017 10:24:11 AM
as I was suspecting , only morons are allowed to be part of KRG.DIDM'T IRAQI COURTS ,JUST RULED AGAINST THE KURDISH VOTE ??? HOW DUMB CAN YOU GET???...
KRG asks Baghdad to respect Federal Court ruling on referendum
| yesterday at 09:41 | (3)
duroi | 11/24/2017 10:18:05 AM
UN is a membership club of states who pay membership fees and UN officials represent their interests. UN condemns the ISIS attack in Tuz Khormatu,...
The ethical missteps of Jan Kubis between Erbil and Baghdad
| 23 hours ago | (1)
Mohamedzzz | 11/18/2017 3:46:05 PM
Nobody can believe these politicians, the most corrupt politicians in EU are the Spanish politicians.
Hander Duukani | 11/24/2017 9:26:56 AM
Please stop relating the Spanish and Catalonian situation. There is no comparison. The unfortunate coincidence of the Catalonian referendum and the...
Spanish PM calls 'bodies on the streets' threats a lie
| 17/11/2017 | (2)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Saudi Prince: Iran’s Supreme Leader is ‘Hitler of the Middle East’ 17 hours ago |

Saudi Prince: Iran’s Supreme Leader is ‘Hitler of the Middle East’

Policy of appeasement did not work against more
Erdogan sees likely cooperation with Assad against YPG 21 hours ago | (1)

Erdogan sees likely cooperation with Assad against YPG

In politics there is nothing called "no way at more
0.469 seconds