Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Iraq elections aren’t known for bringing stability, this year no different

By Ziryan Rojhilatî 12/2/2018
Iraq will hold parliamentary elections on May 12. File photo: Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP
Iraq will hold parliamentary elections on May 12. File photo: Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP
Contrary to what is being said, it is unlikely that elections will lead to political stability in Iraq. Since 2003, no elections have led to political stability. 

The formation of government after elections has always caused knotty problems, political rivalries, and security problems. For 2018, there is no promising indication that we can expect better a situation. There is high possibility that this year will be full of rivalries and complications, just like other post-Saddam years. 

Two things explain why the 2018 elections will not bring about stability in Iraq: first, previous elections; second, current situations. 

A government was not formed in Iraq until more than four months after elections were held in 2005. This is while there were nearly 180,000 American soldiers in Iraq. The Sunnis boycotted the elections, the Kurds were united, but Iraqi Shiites were not as united. The Sadr Movement and Fazila Party pulled out of the Shiite coalition. 

The main reason behind political instability in 2005 was armed conflict and the spread of al-Qaeda, which led to 50 to 60 people dying on a daily basis. 

The 2010 Iraqi elections didn’t lead to anything better. The Iraqi parties formed a government nearly nine months after the elections were held. And that happened only under pressure from Iran and the US. 

The Sunni’s political and security problems continued. The distancing of Sunnis from the government went on for some time. In addition, the Iraqi and Mahdi armies confronted each other. 

The US withdrew its troops from Iraq in 2011. The question of disputed areas escalated between Erbil and Baghdad. Finally, the emergence of ISIS led to the failure of the Iraqi government. 

Nearly five months after the 2014 elections, a government was formed after Nouri al-Maliki was persuaded to relinquish his claim on the post of prime minster.

This led to problems piling up: the war on ISIS, the displacement of Sunnis, change in Iraqi demography, Kurdistan’s referendum, and the return of the Iraqi army to disputed areas. These were the main reasons behind political instability in Iraq following the 2014 elections. 

Contrary to Haider al-Abadi’s announcement that armed groups would be barred from running for office, the Hashd al-Shaabi is taking part in elections using pseudo names. But this will lead to two things. First, election campaigns will tend to focus more on military victories against ISIS and confronting the Kurdistan Region’s independence bid. This will further deepen sectarian politics. 

Second, new militia politicians will alter the internal politics of Iraqi Shiites.

Contrary to the hopes of the US and Saudi Arabia, the main Shiite parties are still under the influence of Iran. 

The Iraqi Sunnis are more inclined to unite, but their main problem is that their voters are absent. Seven Iraqi Sunni cities have been destroyed. More than hundreds of thousands of Sunnis have either emigrated or are internally displaced. That is why they have a shortage of voters.

The so-called victory over ISIS does not mean the end of this organization. ISIS is still quiet, but has the ability to create conditions similar to those of 2006 and 2007. 

Problems between Erbil and Baghdad remain outstanding. The situation is imbalanced and this cannot continue the way it is. A change will happen after the elections. 

Like previous elections, the formation of a government will face problems and there is probability that political instability will strike Iraq again. 

Unlike previous times, the Kurds will enter elections more divided. And this could be like a two-headed sword. If these divisions continue until elections are held, Kurdish dissenters might vote Kurdish parties rather than non-Kurdish ones. However, if these divisions persist until after elections and into negotiations on the formation of the government, this will have a negative impact on the position of Kurds in Iraq. 

The Kurdistan Region’s elections can turn a new page for problems between political parties. This can create better conditions for them to reach an agreement. 

Political parties have the right to engage in election campaigns to win over the hearts and minds of voters by turning to populist rhetoric. But they should think of post-election situations too. 

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Ahmed Karson | 10/23/2018 7:28:41 AM
If we didn't get sold out by foreign powers and their anti-Kurdish agents from PUK, we would become independent this year. President Barzani achieved...
Rebwar | 10/23/2018 7:06:45 PM
Godspeed Mr president Barzani, long live Barzani, long live independent Kurdistan. The map of the Middle East will change soon or later, and the...
Masoud Barzani makes comeback on both Kurdistan, Iraq fronts
| yesterday at 04:28 | (8)
Muraz Adzhoev | 10/23/2018 9:41:54 AM
Reforms can not be implemented in the “Kurdistan Region of Iraq”. The independent sovereign statehood of reintegrated-reunited Southern Kurdistan...
Ahmed Karson | 10/23/2018 5:24:01 PM
Ho ho, one moment. KDP has 45 seats and can easily make goverment on its own. You dont have anything to say until KDP orders you to do so.
New Kurdistan gov’t should distribute powers, continue reforms: deputy PM Talabani
| 21 hours ago | (3)
The Observer | 10/23/2018 4:01:08 PM
Germany killed several members of the Baader-Meinhoff while detained, the U.K killed Diana Spencer and her fiancé Dody Alfayed in Paris, Spain killed...
annex | 10/23/2018 4:51:24 PM
It is now known that Turkey had secret surveillance audio-videos hidden inside the Saudi consulate and most probably in all other diplomatic...
What can Kurds glean from coverage of Khashoggi killing?
| 16 hours ago | (8)
Ahmed Karson | 10/23/2018 3:44:07 PM
When the KDP wanted to defend Kirkuk in the evening of 15th to 16th october, they sent extra power. PUK told them to back of because they made an...
Brutus | 10/23/2018 4:39:12 PM
I tend never to judge someone in advance, but in this case it’s sadly clear. What can u expect from a boy that dress like a Mixture of cobra...
‘Over my dead body’: Bafel Talabani rules out return to PUK-KDP civil war
| yesterday at 10:38 | (16)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

What can Kurds glean from coverage of Khashoggi killing? 16 hours ago | (8)

What can Kurds glean from coverage of Khashoggi killing?

it is to carry cameras with them at all times and more
Iraqi parliament leadership condemns 'Daesh' attack in Qayyarah 17 hours ago |

Iraqi parliament leadership condemns 'Daesh' attack in Qayyarah

The casualties numbered 23, according to Baghdad. more
Erdogan wants Istanbul trial over 'planned' Khashoggi murder 19 hours ago |

Erdogan wants Istanbul trial over 'planned' Khashoggi murder

"My demand is that 18 people be tried in Istanbul more
0.453 seconds