Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment


Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using





Baath-era Court Cherry Picks Constitution for Abadi

By DAVID ROMANO 11/11/2017

This week Rudaw and other news sources reported that “Iraq’s Federal Court ruled…that no article in the constitution allows partition or the separation of any part of the country, with the Iraqi prime minister calling on Erbil to make its position on the ruling clear.”


The so-called “Federal Supreme Court of Iraq” is nothing of the sort, however. Article 92 of Iraq’s constitution states that, first, “The Federal Supreme Court is an independent judicial body, financially and administratively,” and second, “The Federal Supreme Court shall be made up of a number of judges, experts in Islamic jurisprudence, and legal scholars, whose number, the method of their selection, and the work of the Court shall be determined by a law enacted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Council of Representatives.”


Such a law was never passed. Instead, the “Federal Supreme Court of Iraq” functions under Ba’athist-era legislation from the 1970s, and its Chief Justice -- Medhat al-Mahmoud – has participated in Da’awa Party (the Shiite political party of Nuri al-Maliki and Haidar al-Abadi) meetings and was Saddam Hussein’s legal advisor for several years. Mr. Mahmoud was accused by numerous professional legal associations of falling under former Prime Minister Maliki’s control since 2013, with some of his rulings (such as arrest warrants for prominent Sunni politicians in Iraq) announced by Da’awa party leaders before his court itself had announced them.


Former Prime Minister Maliki and now Prime Minister Abadi never respected Article 92 of the Constitution because the two-thirds majority required to form a legal federal court would have forced them to give Kurds or Sunnis a say in how the court in set up and how it functions. One cannot, in other words, have a “federal” court with no buy-in from the various components of the supposed federation such as the Kurdistan Region and various Sunni Arab-majority governorates.


This leads to today’s somewhat ironic situation in which a court with no real legal standing makes pronouncements on the legality of Kurdistan’s recent referendum for independence, among other things. It does so by cherry-picking articles of the constitution that Mr. Abadi and his fellow Da’wa Shiites in Baghdad like and ignoring others. As Rudaw reported on November 6, “According to Elias Samook, a spokesperson for the Federal Court, the court’s decision ‘comes from analyzing Article 1 of the constitution. It sums up that Article 1 and other related constitutional articles stress the territorial integrity of Iraq.’ Samook added: ‘Article 109 of the constitution commits all the federal authorities to protect the integrity of the state.’”


The kangaroo court thus ignores preamble of the constitution which states that “We, the people of Iraq, of all components and across the spectrum, have taken upon ourselves to decide freely and by choice to unite our future…”  Instead they focus on Article 1, which states “The Republic of Iraq is a single  federal, independent and fully sovereign state in which  the  system  of  government  is  republican,  representative, parliamentary, and democratic”, but apparently forget the second half of this same article which adds “and this Constitution is a guarantor of the unity of Iraq.” A court whose very existence (in place of a legitimate federally-established and legal court) speaks to Baghdad’s violation of the constitution, presumptuously issues verdicts about the legality of Kurdistan’s referendum – a referendum that was engendered by the “federal” government in Baghdad’s failure to uphold close to seventy of the constitution’s 144 articles.


The court thus also selectively reads Article 109 ("The federal authorities shall preserve the unity, integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Iraq and its federal democratic system") to ignore the part about "federal democratic system" and just focus on "unity and integrity." Unfortunately, one cannot have unity and integrity after ignoring the "federal democratic" part.


Article 65, which required the creation of a second house of parliament (the “Federation Council”) through which the regions and governorates could pursue their interests, was likewise never enacted by Baghdad. Articles about shared competencies over oil and gas were ignored by Baghdad, and articles about the rights of governorates to form new regions (as the Sunni Arabs tried to do after 2012) were forcefully blocked by Baghdad. While the constitution does not allow nor forbid Kurdistan’s recent referendum, it does in Article 140 mandate a referendum in the disputed territories to be held by December 2007 – which like the other articles it doesn’t like, the government in Baghdad ignored. The list of Baghdad’s violations is long indeed, as laid out by an analysis from the Kurdistan Regional Government (


Unfortunately, this is the Iraq that the United States, Britain, the United Nations and others are demanding the Kurds remain a part of. No matter how abusive this marriage becomes, with Prime Minister Abadi now looking like little more than a more polite version of Maliki or even of Saddam, everyone with the exception of Israel demands that the Kurds submit in perpetuity. Instead of putting pressure on the “federal” government to respect its own constitutional commitments, Washington arms its latest man in Baghdad, enables the Iranians and keeps on demanding that the Kurds obey.


All of which just goes to show: “Justice” is only for those who have the will and means to fight for it.


David Romano has been a Rudaw columnist since 2010. He holds the Thomas G. Strong Professor of Middle East Politics at Missouri State University and is the author of numerous publications on the Kurds and the Middle East.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.


Data pager
Page size:
kurt basar | 11/11/2017
Mr. Abadi has every right to cherry pick the Constitution, because he has upper hand with backing of the Salafi fascist Turkish/ ISIL terror state & Shiite Iranian savage terrorists. The blame of this unjust act should go to the Naive Mr. Barzani & Talabani clans, because in the frame of 20 years, they could have one strong Kurdish National army, one capital, legitimate president & a national congress. But unfortunately they were very busy for to enlarge their bank account, and by doing that, they sold the noble Kurd's to the Lizard eaters. And Kurd's lost their Kerkuk & it's vicinity at this once a life time historical era, because of their greed & power struggle.
Mohammed M.A. Ahmed (Dr.) | 11/11/2017
The KRG needs more specialists like Professor Romano to expose al-Abadi's sectarian government lies, who are misusing the constitution as a cover for their illegal practices against the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). He is legitimizing his actions against the KRG on the bases of decisions issued by the so-called Iraq's Supreme Court, giving al-Abadi an absolute authority to preserve Iraq's unity at all costs. The Supreme Court is judicial, not the legislative branch of the government. While the Supreme Court told al-Abadi that there was no article in the constitution to prohibit holding a referendum, al-Abadis' government used this to mean that the constitution does not allow Iraq's division. It would be instrumental if the constitution is displayed on the internet in order to deprive the Shiite-dominated government of its disinformation campaign against the Kurds Mohammed Ahmed
Airmail | 11/11/2017
@Kurt, spot on, their dogs on this forum still attack an accuse eachother of "treason" when they are the sole cause of corruption and treason . The ruling tribal clan are so power hungry and blinded by corruption that they couldn't find it within themselves to even give up the presidential seat only for a 4 years to Barhim Saleh back in 2006, they immediately shut down parliament when things didn't go their way, they stalled the reunification of the Peahmerga in fear of loosing their hold on their party militias, and so on. And when the other parties retaliated against them their dogs start barking as loud as they can to deflect attention away from the real treason commited to our people, from their failures and the disaster they've brought on the people
A Kurd in exile | 12/11/2017
"'Justice' is only for those who have the will and means to fight for it." ---------- Well said!!! Well said, indeed!!! Thank you Professor Romano!
Stop | 12/11/2017
Neither the Iraqui constitution nor any other constitution on earth allows a country to launch war on "its" citizens because they have participated in a poll that was held peacefully and transparently. Everyone knows that this invasion was expected to happen the day the I.S. was done, without any referendum or any provocation. This latest war on Kurds was well agreed, and tactically facilitated, by the U.S.A., a country that joined Iran, Turkey and Iraq in this invasion of Kurdistan. This is the undisputed fact that took place . Let me remind eveyone here that in the period around the battle of Mosul the Kurdish government was pressuring on the US to draw and commit to a POST-I.S. plan in avoindance of the more than expected iraqui invasion of Kurdistan; all that was well before the referendum. Why avoiding these key facts and starting to barking on Barzani ? Some comments here on treason comparing people of the KRG to some Talabani's family memberes are disonest and regrettable. True Kurds should remain faithful to the ideal of the Kurdish statehood which remains at the essence of the KRG despite the gruesome treason commited by those children of Talabani and associates.
Tags :

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Mohamedzzz | 1/23/2018 6:17:28 AM
Shame on Bashar al Assad for not protecting it's civilians and territories, he should not expect respect and obedience as Syrian citizens from the...
Turkey steps up assault on Kurdish militia in Syria
| 8 hours ago | (1)
Forked tongue | 1/23/2018 5:50:39 AM
As I speak with s Forked tongue, (American Indian for how the tongue of a snake points left and right -- and as applied to a human as being a liar)...
The Kurd | 1/23/2018 5:58:50 AM
The US is eating its hat , is bowing to Erdogan , and it is surrendering to Turkey. Nevertheless, the brave Kurds will fight and defeat Turkey, the...
Anakara Throws the Dice in Afrin
| yesterday at 09:15 | (14)
kurt basar | 1/23/2018 5:17:40 AM
It's a disgrace for those supposed to be civilized but hypocrite nations for allowing those barbaric Muslim/ ISIL Turkish criminals to massacring of...
Sochi congress meaningless after Afrin: Kurdish leader
| 18 hours ago | (1)
Hami Sayadi | 1/22/2018 10:21:44 PM
Turkey wants no Kurds speaking in the world, Turkey wants No Kurdish word in the dictionary,,,
Volkan | 1/22/2018 10:44:16 PM
This is just the beginning watch us , hate us, cry about it , talk about it. Doesnt change the fact that we will take what is ours, we gave you sell...
Turkish aggression against Kurdish Afrin continues
| 17 hours ago | (6)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Erdogan to convene security council meeting on Afrin operation 5 hours ago |

Erdogan to convene security council meeting on Afrin operation

MGK will also discuss international concerns more
Will Ankara and Damascus clash or collaborate in Afrin? 7 hours ago |

Will Ankara and Damascus clash or collaborate in Afrin?

Moscow did give Ankara some kind of green-light more
0.438 seconds