Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

Abadi needs to pull Iraq back from destructive course against Kurds

By Paul Iddon 14/10/2017
Defaced Kurdistan flags at a former Peshmerga position in Tuz Khurmatu now held by Iraqi forces on Friday. Photo: AFP
Defaced Kurdistan flags at a former Peshmerga position in Tuz Khurmatu now held by Iraqi forces on Friday. Photo: AFP
As Kurdish Peshmerga troops are preparing for a possible Iraqi Army and Shiite-majority Hashd al-Shaabi attack on Kirkuk, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi needs to demonstrate real leadership and political acumen by working to avert any possibility of a destructive war breaking out. 

After the Iraqi parliament compelled Abadi to send the army into the city and seize its oil facilities late last month, the Iraqi premier tweeted that: “We defend our Kurdish citizens as we defend all Iraqis and will not allow any attack on them.” 

This came after a month of hostile threats from Iranian-backed units of the Hashd al-Shaabi paramilitaries to attack Peshmerga in the city. These paramilitaries are recognized by the Iraqi government as a parallel force to the regular army which, unlike the Peshmerga, receive government salaries. 

Abadi also told the Peshmerga not to confront any Iraqi Army or Hashd forces in Kirkuk, insisting that the Peshmerga has to answer to Baghdad's orders since, in his words, there is only supposed to be “one leadership, not two.” 

Even before the Peshmerga took complete control over Kirkuk, saving it from being overrun by ISIS in June 2014 after the Iraqi Army infamously withdrew south, Abadi's predecessor Nouri al-Maliki sought to bring the Kurdish soldiers firmly under Baghdad's command and control. This attempt failed following tense standoffs between the Iraqi Army and Peshmerga on Iraq's borders with the autonomous region. Expecting Kurdistan's leadership to relinquish command over the Peshmerga following three years of relying on them, not the Iraqi Army, to defend the region against an existential terrorist threat is unrealistic and completely untenable to Kurds. 

Furthermore, Abadi's call for one leadership is peculiar considering that the commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC) extraterritorial Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani, is the one unleashing the Hashd on Kirkuk, as he reportedly warned the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) he would do before the referendum. If this is true then it shows where the real lack of leadership is. Also, if Abadi fails to prevent the Hashd attacking Kirkuk on the orders of Iran, then he will give the Kurds yet another reason to opt for complete secession from Iraq.  

On Kirkuk the demands he made on Friday, for the Kurds to surrender all the oilfields, the airport and the K-1 military base, are completely untenable and amount to demanding outright surrender of most of the city, which the Kurds are unlikely to accept. 

Ultimately this means that instead of becoming the first Iraqi leader to conclusively resolve the status of Kirkuk, as stipulated by Article 140 of the constitution that he so frequently cites to Kurds, Abadi has permitted the sending of armour and artillery to once again threaten the Kurds through brute force as his predecessor Nouri al-Maliki did before him. 

In the run-up to the referendum (when he said, in July, that he would ignore the referendum and not send tanks to Kurdistan) and since, Abadi has clearly been trying to have it both ways. He claims that Baghdad has no intent on harming the people of the Kurdistan Region through its punitive post-referendum measures, just the region's leadership. Shortly after his government closed the airspace over Kurdistan, preventing international flights from flying directly to either Erbil or Sulaimani, Abadi tweeted that: “We will protect the rights of all Iraqis including our Kurdish citizens, we will not punish them for the mistakes of regional officials.”

Threats of banking sanctions on the region will “preserve the interests” of its inhabitants and will only affect the leadership he claims. However economic sanctions, as countless other examples have shown over the years, are usually sweeping by nature and the leaders they are supposed to pressure usually feel the effects of them long after the people do.

Upon suggesting that Turkey transfer revenue made from Kurdish oil exported through the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline, Abadi claimed that: “Federal government control of oil revenues is in order to pay KR [Kurdistan Region] employee salaries in full and so that money will not go to the corrupt.” 

What mechanism Abadi had in mind for such fairer distribution is unclear. Kurdistan's oil has funded development and construction across the region, which was thriving before Baghdad severed Erbil's constitutional share of the federal budget and the beginning of the war with ISIS. 

Even in Kirkuk, security and stability improved drastically under the leadership of Governor Najmaldin Karim, which the Iraqi parliament recently voted to sack, to the extent that new roads were being built in the city for the first time in many years.

This was in stark contrast to the southern Iraqi port city of Basra, which has larger oilfields than Kirkuk, but scant development of the local economy. During the summer 2015 social protests in Iraq some protesters held a placard that wittily depicted their province as a bony milking cow. If Abadi is so concerned about fairer distribution of oil revenue in Iraq, he could start by investigating why Basra remains so underdeveloped in spite of being stupendously resource-rich. 

The precondition Abadi's government set for negotiations with Erbil aimed at lifting sanctions, and in the long-term averting any potential confrontation in the Kirkuk flashpoint, was Erbil canceling the outcome of the referendum. Even if it were somehow possible to do so, no Kurdish leader could make such an enormous concession just to enter negotiations and expect the people who overwhelmingly voted yes in that referendum to take him seriously. 

The Kurdish referendum has sometimes been described by Kurdish officials as the beginnings of an “amicable divorce.” Instead Baghdad has sought to, through measures that do amount to “collective punishment,” lock Erbil into an increasingly abusive and unwanted wedlock while telling the Region's people it's for their own good. 

How long such a state-of-affairs can last is unclear. For Abadi to prove his worth in the meantime as a conciliatory and reasonable leader he needs to quit trying to have it both ways and initiate negotiations with Erbil in good faith and iron out the many outstanding issues which remain between them.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.

 

Comments

 
Data pager
Previous
12
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
PLINY THE KURD | 15/10/2017
The present crisis was to happen also without the referendum.No nation on earth holds a referendum just to annule it . Independence will happen any way : with war or without war .America should pressure on Baghdad to take the path of peacefully implement the blessed referendum.
Jay | 15/10/2017
Abadi has no power over Iraq, he is just another Iranian puppet like Maliki. On the other hand Hashd Al-Shaabi is running Iraq backed by Iran. The formula was Iraq wanted to abandon Kirkuk for Isis for Isis to sell oil and revenues go to Iran as Isis was created by Iran to cause meyhem in Sunni areas as well as Kurdistan. Hashd Al-Shaabi wants to invade Kirkuk so that Iran benefits from selling oil and funding their activities in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and other areas.
duroi | 15/10/2017
The force major زور game that US educated Iranian diplomats like H. SheikholIslam, in close coordination with IRGC Suleimani, have been playing in the region differs from the normal diplomacy game and KRG leadership needs to study, master and play it if they want to win points. The expectation that these areas are Kurdish and majority have voted for independence in a referendum, needs to be coupled with tough negotiation and "force" now. KRG wants the areas north of Hemrin, it should go for areas East of Tigris (even areas south of 34N Par, south of Sirwan river, along Kurdish Ilam province in Iran) until the Iraqi party accepts the middle ground of Hemrin as a concession. If your starting position is Hamrin in the negotiation, it will be very tough to get Hamrin at the end. Negotiation 101 ...
Forked tongue | 15/10/2017
We will see if Abadi is a statesman for peace or a puppet of the Shiite forces led by Iran. A quiet word behind the scenes from the US and Coalition will be persuasive with Air Power a threat to Abadi's and Iran's aims. The Kurds should not fear the bombasity of Arabs with Forked tongues.
Mohammad | 16/10/2017
The Kurds have been playing with Iraq national security and internal peace for decade.. it is time for chicken to come home to roost! Under Saddam dictatorship.. we Arabs and specially Shiah had sympathy for Kurdish people condition.. but now we see that the Kurds have agendas beyond peaceful and prosperous coexistence in one country.. they already shown their animosity to Iraq and the rest of the region by establishing Israeli Mossad bases and erecting Israeli flag at any opportunity.. humiliating and harming Iraqi army and security forces when ever they can get away with it, and harboring the terrorist in the areas under their control. Time to teach them a lesson.. if dig a trap for your brothers you will fall in it first!
Post a New Comment
Comment as a guest or Login for more enhanced interactive experience

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

Slemani | 11/20/2017 12:39:41 PM
Dear Mr Barzani, with all due respect this type of taking only works when your opponent is a human being, all this civilised taking are falling on...
PM Barzani: KRG needs 'third party' help to interpret Iraqi constitution
| 14 hours ago | (1)
hate turkey | 11/20/2017 12:08:45 PM
There would be no IRAQ if the Kurds did not stand up to ISIS while your army RAN AWAY.
Referendum | 11/20/2017 12:29:02 PM
93%,,, This Micky Mouse Court going against Democratic Process of Voting and calling it illegal, How about the Fail of Mosul by Maliki or the illegal...
UPDATED: Iraqi Federal Court rules referendum 'unconstitutional', cancels its results
| 18 hours ago | (10)
Shaboom | 11/20/2017 7:14:49 AM
He must of heard oil it’s free now a days in Baghdad....
Love Kurdistan | 11/20/2017 9:09:59 AM
It would be his most stupid decision of his entire life. Becoming a citizen of Iraq to play in their national team. They are faking everything....
American basketball player becomes Iraqi citizen to join national team
| 19 hours ago | (2)
Kurdo | 11/16/2017 5:12:01 PM
Rudaw is blocking comments, you guys are just like press tv.
Masque du Furet | 11/20/2017 9:06:34 AM
Well, if I understand (a) It is not Barzani's fault of making an ill designed referndum. (b) it is not the US fault (did they spend the last 14 years...
Kurds shouldn't only blame America, Europe is a bigger accomplice
| 14/11/2017 | (23)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Qubad Talabani warns of existential threat facing PUK, Kurdistan 5 hours ago |

Qubad Talabani warns of existential threat facing PUK, Kurdistan

“Without a cohesive, strong and united PUK, more
Kirkuk Provincial Council chief postpones first meeting since crisis 6 hours ago |

Kirkuk Provincial Council chief postpones first meeting since crisis

Council member must feel safe and secure in more
Calm prevails though no real progress in ongoing Iraq-Kurd security talks: Minister 7 hours ago |

Calm prevails though no real progress in ongoing Iraq-Kurd security talks: Minister

ISIS is still present in some areas and makes more
0.297 seconds