Sign In / Up

Add contribution as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Comment as a guest

Your email will not be displayed publicly
Benefit of signing in/signing up to personalize comment

Login

Not a member Register   Forgot Password
or connect using
 

Email

 

Rudaw

Opinion

The dangers of postponing the Hawija offensive

By Arif Qurbany 28/10/2016
-
-

 

Bypassing Hawija on the way to Mosul or postponing its liberation operation raises serious questions. I have been asking myself and other people about this. I hear that this is just a military tactic, that the liberation of Mosul will consequently force ISIS out of Hawija.


I do not find this convincing. There is a lot more than the obvious objective behind fighting ISIS, namely the struggle between the Sunnis and the Shiites, the rivalry among the warring factions, the problem between Erbil and Baghdad and their disagreement over the identity of the disputed areas, Baghdad’s effort to keep the Hashd al-Shaabi force operational, and other relevant matters. This indicates that bypassing Hawija is due to ulterior political motives, namely a pressure card on Kirkuk and Garmian.


The recent assault on Kirkuk confirms this reality. However, one of their objectives behind the attack was possibly to reduce the already increasing military pressure on Mosul, especially after ISIS realized that their defeat could only come at the hands of the Peshmerga, and that the Iraqi forces could not advance alone on Mosul.


ISIS wanted to change the balance of the war by attacking Kirkuk, possibly aiming to force the Peshmerga to withdraw some of its forces from the Mosul front to Kirkuk. Perhaps they also wanted to show the world that retaking Mosul is not that easy. If they could attack Kirkuk with a force of fifty militants, being able to stay there for two days, tens of thousands of militants can stay a lot longer in Mosul.


Postponing the Hawija operation is intended to undermine the Kurdish standing in the region, regardless of whether or not ISIS can put up a lengthy resistance in Mosul, i.e. whether they will fight to stay there or leave for Syria.


Even though I do not know the answer to the question of delaying Hawija, I have no doubt that this is to re-impose Baghdad’s hegemony on the disputed areas on the one hand, and to ensure that the Peshmerga do not end up being the sole hero of the war on ISIS, on the other.


But the Peshmerga’s push against ISIS over the past two years has shown the world how heroic the Peshmerga forces are in defeating ISIS. The Peshmerga liberated the majority of the disputed areas which were under Iraqi control before ISIS, and are now protecting them.


Baghdad wants to drive the Peshmerga out of these disputed areas, and does not want the Peshmerga to continue being seen as the hero in the fight against ISIS.


There is disagreement between Erbil and Baghdad over the future of these disputed areas after the demise of ISIS, with Erbil apparently insisting on keeping the area under Peshmerga control and Baghdad wanting to bring it back under the federal government by pushing the Peshmerga forces back to where they were before ISIS.


By postponing the Hawija operation, the Iraqi government wants to impose the participation of the Shiite militia in the liberation of ISIS-held areas and giving the militia legitimacy in governing them after they are freed.


The Iraqi government wanted to attribute the success of the war against ISIS to its army and the Hashd al-Shaabi forces, which is why they initially tried to exclude the Peshmerga from the Mosul offensive.


However, the Iraqi government eventually accepted the participation of the Peshmerga forces in the operation to recapture Mosul, and this was due to the indispensable role the Peshmerga have had in defeating ISIS in the region.


The Islamic State might transfer through Hawija its dispersed militants to Kirkuk all the way to Saadiya and Jalawla, so that the Shiite militia have a role in ejecting ISIS in these areas, diminishing the Peshmerga role in the war.


Kurds should bring the Hawija offensive forward or liberate the town concurrently with Mosul in order to avoid these eventualities.


The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rudaw.

Comments

 
duroi | 28/10/2016
Hawije is at the southern gateway to Mosul and any group dominant in Hawije can close the gateway and entrap the forces marching to Mosul. One hopes KRG make sure that Kurdish soldiers in Iraqi army and pishmergas do not sleepwalk into another military fiasco in Mosul worse than Mosul 2014, Faw and Karbala 4. Forewarned is forearmed.
General Dastan | 28/10/2016
You Kurds will get out of Kirkuk and Nineveh preferably peacefully but if not that way then forcefully.Do you think Iranians and Turks are carrots to see and watch that KRG annexes Kirkuk?PMU and Iraqi Arabs will come after you when they finish the job of ISIS.I love Kurdish blood Best Regards, General Dastan
KS | 28/10/2016
The author of this article was on the Ba'ath party payroll and is the definition of a jash.
bebegun | 31/10/2016
@General Hotair, as if threats have ever stopped Kurds, I'm not going to badmouth all Iranians and Turks but scum like you have tried that and much worse for well over a century, how has it worked out for you so far?. If there's only one thing you should've learned about Kurds by now is that you can NEVER intimidate or submit us, now come to Kerkuk with your imaginary army mr. internett warrior and see what happens
Tags :
4438 Views

Be Part of Your Rudaw!

Share your stories, photos and videos with Rudaw, and quite possibly the world.

What You Say

TheRatInTheFarm | 4/23/2018 12:29:03 PM
@Dutchan : I assume it is Dutchman, probably the same 'DutchNational' that posts around places. Do European Union citizens get to vote 'both' on...
Outsider | 4/23/2018 2:21:37 PM
I read here a lot about pigs...well I think the Turkish population will decide who is the pig in the game...would be surprised if it will be the drug...
Turkey accuses Austria, Holland of ‘poisoning democratic values’
| yesterday at 12:02 | (14)
Hamid Sayadi | 4/23/2018 8:21:52 AM
The Kurds are used by the USA, As Dold Trump said {{ I like Kurdish people and I will use them }}!! So what it means "good by" Kurds any time, now...
Outsider | 4/23/2018 2:14:24 PM
Without having Turkey on their side...any "achievement" is doomed to be short lived...
US has critical role to play in post-war Syria: Macron
| 23 hours ago | (7)
pre-Boomer Marine brat | 4/23/2018 12:52:23 PM
A friend here lived in Turkey and thinks that Erdogan is going insane - lust for power taking control. ... If so, the Rais will eventually destroy...
Outsider | 4/23/2018 2:10:30 PM
First time that I agree with the overall assessment...except it is very unlikely that HDP will get over the required 10%...the Turkish liberals which...
Boycotting Erdogan's Rigged Elections
| 10 hours ago | (6)
Love Kurdistan | 4/23/2018 12:10:49 PM
Great news. Welcome it 100%.
FAUthman | 4/23/2018 1:30:44 PM
US builds one of its biggest consulates in the world right there in Erbil, hallelujah*:) happy! sure does not look like a US betrayal of Kurds so...
In Erbil, US Ambassador announces construction of largest consulate complex
| 5 hours ago | (3)

Elsewhere on Rudaw

Kissing female Iraqi candidate’s poster costs $84,000 4 hours ago |

Kissing female Iraqi candidate’s poster costs $84,000

the campaign poster was of Hadba al-Hasnawi more
Singer hopes to raise humanitarian aid for Afrin in new song 5 hours ago |

Singer hopes to raise humanitarian aid for Afrin in new song

I am Afrin, I am sweet and I am the injured bride more
In Erbil, US Ambassador announces construction of largest consulate complex 5 hours ago |

In Erbil, US Ambassador announces construction of largest consulate complex

"The United States wants to work with the KRG more
0.39 seconds